They have the right to "their body" when it's murdering via literally chopping up another persons body, but if you don't want to be forced to get an injection in your own actual body, then suddenly it's a problem.
They say "my body my choice" when it isn't their body.
And say "your rights end when the safety of others begins" when it's your body.
In both cases they are being hypocrites, and in both cases the person being affected has a right to their own body (The right of body of the baby to not be murdered, and the right of the adult to not be forcibly injected)
They have the right to "their body" when it's murdering via literally chopping up another persons body, but if you don't want to be forced to get an injection in your own actual body, then suddenly it's a problem.
non-sequiters
You can be against BOTH and most practicing evangelicals are against both. There aren't many kooks/cucks who are against either.
I think you might be misunderstanding my point.
They say "my body my choice" when it isn't their body. And say "your rights end when the safety of others begins" when it's your body.
In both cases they are being hypocrites, and in both cases the person being affected has a right to their own body (The right of body of the baby to not be murdered, and the right of the adult to not be forcibly injected)
You're right. I keep forgetting the leftist hypocrisy gene. This newspeak is tough.
The BIBLE talks about the coming coercion. You have a right to refuse, but not the right to buy or sell without it...