Here the guy says "We have something coming in Georgia that will shock you, it is nothing that has been discussed before" link
Now he says "I am hoping this is the lawsuit I discussed on @Newsmax Saturday but don’t want to get ahead of @SidneyPowell1" https://twitter.com/JordanSekulow/status/1331439488522973184
So, he doesn't have a direct knowledge or anything like that but he says "we have something..." This is one of the good tick-tocks. It might happen thanks to Sidney, but really Tick-Tocks are really detrimentally pacifying.
The worst part of this community is the constant false flag tick-tock'ing. But THIS time it'll actually happen, right?
I'm not a Doomer, but I can see how a lot of doomers become doomers, due to the constant BS and "tick tock" that floats around here.
If Sidney Powell currently had something to change the election before the deadlines, Trump would have easily assigned her to manage the campaign instead of oil-drippin' Guliani... but tick tockers gonna tell you that Sidney's going to lock up over half our government. OK, lol.
I will pray that POTUS prevails with the constitutional issues, while giving Sidney a chance to build her separate litigation to see what happens... but GTFO with that tick tock/trust the plan BS.
people consume more fiction than real stuff. I keep seeing unrealistic expectations that... it just won't happen. But this is really detrimental, it's harming the cause.
also, Sidney talked about all the evidence she has, and in my opinion it's more than enough for a successful litigation, if you consider how many (most) lawsuits are based on witness testimonies. in this case we have more. But there is still an assumption that there should be more. What else do people expect? Secret recordings of a dominion management meeting? Biden pushing a button to increase his votes? it won't happen. this is all the evidence we have, and the key is to convince decision makers: judges, justices and legislators.
Very nice reply, you indeed conveyed what I think -- people are setting their expectations way too high.
I have great hope and will eagerly watch Sidney's litigation, but that's not what gets us to the dance before the deadline. Hopefully the constitutional violations of states can alone get us to the end-game, and then Sidney & POTUS can mop up this Dominion mess over the next several months.
I do think it's telling that POTUS separated their campaign from Sidney. They didn't quite explain what I'm hearing from other Pedes. "She's just doing her own separate case that doesn't interfere with Trump's!" OK...why didn't they basically say as much on the Trump Campaign statement? To me it looks like they took a step back after claiming that things were "biblical" and that Kemp and so many others would be going to jail, etc... maybe a little too "out there" at this time, but GOD I hope she produces them receipts! EXPOSE THEM ALL.
And yes, all the evidence in the world doesn't matter if it doesn't get the correct action from the decision makers. We can only hope & pray that real justice will prevail.
normally a lawyer doesn't speak that much and also advises their clients not to speak to public during the litigation. Sidney is on TV/radio twice a day. She says the same things on every occasion because she assumes different audience, and it's true. not everybody is like td.win followers sucking every info from every source.
Another reason why she spoke too much is the media pushes a false narrative and the Trump supporters are about to lose hope. and the amount of supporters affects the decision makers. that's how they got what they want through threats in MI. She had to talk because nobody else was doing it.
Patrick Byrne is the main source of her claims. When you listen to him, you'll notice that Sidney is just repeating him. But no one in the media gave him a chance to talk. Sidney offered him to Cucker Tarlson, he refused it, too.
I don't know why I wrote so much, but the problem with Sidney is not the Sidney herself. The bottomless pits of us live expect movie-like events where all the bad guys go down all at once.
Normally a lawyer doesn't say things like "this is going to be biblical", "I'm releasing the kraken", etc. and then almost retcon it by saying they are still building the evidence. Either you have it or you don't. If you're still "gathering it", then you shouldn't make such huge statements until it's fully gathered and/or presented.
I do like Sidney a lot more than Rudy, which is why I was disappointed (but understood) about the legal team separation. But it seemed like a reactionary move, since she was present and speaking at last week's presser.
And yes, above all else, we're a society that wants action & results at light-speed. Hopefully it'll be worth the wait! I'll never give up hope.
also, regarding "nothing that has been discussed before" :
everything has been discussed, there is no mind-boggling new evidence. There is enough evidence for all types of fraud. this kind of insatiable expectation shows that the MSM is able to control our thinking.