the second part is whoever wrote this, summary applied today as anything else. The 2nd amendment was written a long time ago, but you can reword it to make sense for today without losing its original meaning. They did not mean muskets only...they indeed meant tactical nukes. Not even joking. The fact that we as modern people agree we dont all need nukes is amazing, just let us have guns and its cool.....
I guess. But even the muskets arguement is void. The 2nd does not say muskets. It says arms. So its a broad statement. If i want a bazooka, i should have a bazooka. Idk about a tactical nuke. Seems a little overkill lol
it is overkill, but we as a collective nation agree that those should be under close guard and restricted to the federal gov.....but, tech speaking, we are rightfully allowed by the constitution to have ARMS, which includes non-conventional arms
the second part is whoever wrote this, summary applied today as anything else. The 2nd amendment was written a long time ago, but you can reword it to make sense for today without losing its original meaning. They did not mean muskets only...they indeed meant tactical nukes. Not even joking. The fact that we as modern people agree we dont all need nukes is amazing, just let us have guns and its cool.....
I guess. But even the muskets arguement is void. The 2nd does not say muskets. It says arms. So its a broad statement. If i want a bazooka, i should have a bazooka. Idk about a tactical nuke. Seems a little overkill lol
it is overkill, but we as a collective nation agree that those should be under close guard and restricted to the federal gov.....but, tech speaking, we are rightfully allowed by the constitution to have ARMS, which includes non-conventional arms