22
Comments (10)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Imin-theinternet 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess. But even the muskets arguement is void. The 2nd does not say muskets. It says arms. So its a broad statement. If i want a bazooka, i should have a bazooka. Idk about a tactical nuke. Seems a little overkill lol

1
JustTheNews [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

it is overkill, but we as a collective nation agree that those should be under close guard and restricted to the federal gov.....but, tech speaking, we are rightfully allowed by the constitution to have ARMS, which includes non-conventional arms