Biden total votes across the state were ALWAYS 2x the amount of Dem Mail In votes counted!!
pa_mail_in_vs_total_ratio_D_and_R_by_county.png
FUCCKKKIINNNNNGGGG HUGGGEE!!!!!!!!!!!!! PROOF OF ALGORITHMIC TURNOUT!!!!!
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Biden total votes across the state were ALWAYS 2x the amount of Dem Mail In votes counted!!
pa_mail_in_vs_total_ratio_D_and_R_by_county.png
FUCCKKKIINNNNNGGGG HUGGGEE!!!!!!!!!!!!! PROOF OF ALGORITHMIC TURNOUT!!!!!
That's crazy. Your picture makes it seem like you're showing only some of the counties, but looking through your SQL, it seems it's pulling all counties.
This graph is showing that the ratio of total votes for biden to mail-in votes to Biden is nearly always 2.
Total votes for Biden / Mail-in votes for Biden ~~ 2
Total votes for Trump / Mail-in votes for Trump has no trend at all.
This is amazing. Not sure how one could explain this ratio.
It's FUCKING HUGE! It proves algorithmic turnout! It means what we're reading as the result is mechanically set or straight up not what people voted for!
That's right! It would great to run the same analysis on every state. We should see similar trends in other states suspected of election fraud...and if we don't see this anywhere else then it makes it even more obvious they were running votes through an algorithm....I imagine that deviance from 2.00 for Biden's ratio would be explained by using random values in the algorithm....
Here's the frequency of the ratios for Biden:
That looks like a bell curve, doesn't it...
My fucking god it descends on a perfect center at 2.1. Genius (observation)!
It does seem your data is a bit off...some people below ran the data and they get slightly different results. I ran the data, too...I think you're still onto something...
Here's my graph:
https://imgur.com/a/Yrey4IM
And here are the frequencies I get:
I used the data linked below by Bathouse Barry
It’s not total votes / mail in votes for ie Biden, it’s total votes / mail in votes from Dems specifically (regardless of who they voted for, it’s unknown). You need all three dbs crossed to get the numbers.
Edit: actually I think you can do it with just the mail in db and results db because I think the I put the party in the mail in db.
Well, it's clear the trend is still there for total votes / mail in votes for Biden as well....it's just that the number is at 1.9 instead. No way in hell all the data points should be that tightly grouped around the mean.
Ya I was going to say I would have reported the same thing if I would have saw your graph first. I think your analysis of the deviance seals it / kills it. It's algorithmic
Awesome find. Im gonna have to trust your math because this shit is like mandarin to me.
FOLKS THIS IS SOOOOO FUCKING HUGE! It doesn't show how specifically the algorithm was used to steal the election but that one was used! FUCKING HUGE!!!
This would suggest that the number of mail in votes for dems was taken from before the election and entered in to ensure that any votes Biden didn't receive up to 2x that on election day were switched to Biden if the total count was not extrapolating towards that, to stay on course predictively; that explains the slight variation from the target I guess. In order to achieve this, the machines at the precincts were compromised to flip votes to produced a fixed percentage result in a tabulation update for a hijacked precinct as explained in Edward Solomon's Videos on Pennsylvania
Another bizarre statistical anomaly. Every way we look there are number not explainable
They're not explainable in a free and fair election. They're perfectly reasonable in a fraudulent election.
What a bunch of idiots, the better thing now is to watch all of them go to prison!
In all groups (counties? Precincts?), Biden’s number of votes is 2x the number of mail in votes.
Trumps votes follow no relationship at all.
Trump's second term is gonna be SO SPICY!:
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS33c0da/2nd-term-issa-so-spicy/c/
Red for Trump, please.
Holy fuck Holy fuck Holy fuck Holy fuck Holy fuck Holy fuck Holy fuck
Should @RudyGiuliani and the other crowd too!
send to the VIP guy maybe.
Please try to plot this plot this:
what I hope you will get:
I found a similar pattern with "MixElectionD" in the oakland data, described in this comment
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8lS215l/x/c/1BkBNOLxps
(forget the noise about principal components in my comment - republican/dem is the main principal component and straight ratio of dem/rep votes is easier to understand).
I don't understand what this means. I was a history major, not mathematics. Can someone explain this to me?
Do the lawyers or Trump team have this info??
This is garbage so far.
In order for this to be useful, you need to provide a text, that explains the context, inputs, sources, methods, your observations and conclusions.
Conclusions only, while sensational, are completely useless.
These are the dbs that were used !
https://gofile.io/d/jnHZEV
2020-11-03 PA Voter Rolls, Mail In Ballot Check Site Scrub, and Pa Election Returns.pa.gov results
The query used in is the txt given!
U need to provide a context, inputs, sources, methods and observations.
Please be a functional autist.
You need to provide a functioning brain, faggot
Not very polite, but accurate. @NotMyGovernor, thank you for taking time to do this. Please explain where you got the data and how you computed your results. Some of us (myself included, in this case) need it spelled out.
Again, thank you very much for doing this. God bless.
Thanks, but I was unable to replicate your results. Here are the steps that I took:
What I get are various ratios between 0.82 and 2.05. Most are nowhere close to 2.000. Thus, I didn't conclude that Joe's in-person votes were pegged at exactly twice his mail-in votes.
What steps did you do to perform the computation? Thanks.
You should be looking at the ratio of mail-in votes to Biden's total votes.
I set it up in Excel, and I see the following:
Biden: Mean=1.9, StdDev=0.18
Trump: Mean=6.8, StdDev=1.4
Jorgens: Mean=3.8, StdDev=0.81
Biden's numbers stay very tightly bound to this 1.9 value, whereas Trump's and Jorgensen's vary much more.
It's reasonable for the average to be much lower than Trump's since Democrats largely voted by mail. Whether this tiny standard deviation makes sense I'm not sure.
I get the same....
Here's a plot of the data:
https://imgur.com/a/Yrey4IM
I agree on Biden's numbers staying very tightly bound to 1.9. Looking at the graph, I don't see how one could explain that as making sense. Are there any reasonable explanations?
It seems non intuitive to me, and warrants more smart people thinking about it.
It seems like as counties get more conservative, you should have a higher fraction of Democrats voting in person. (Plot twist: they did, but they actually voted for Donald Trump.)
Ok, I'll check again when I have my laptop. Thanks!