455
posted ago by DJTMAGA4LIFE ago by DJTMAGA4LIFE +455 / -0

Hell Yeah! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Comments (39)
sorted by:
6
Qwikphaze 6 points ago +6 / -0

Can he with a pardon?

2
skumario 2 points ago +3 / -1

Exactly. I did not think so. He has been sullied. He should never have lied (though framed) and should have pleaded the 5th when the FBI went after him.

9
Qwikphaze 9 points ago +9 / -0

I don’t believe he lied.

5
innominata 5 points ago +5 / -0

He didn't, none of the FBI records ever show he mentioned sanctions, and its hard to lie about something that is never brought up

2
skumario 2 points ago +3 / -1

Lets say he should have really zipped up taking the 5th.

2
TDCRedpill 2 points ago +3 / -1

Well, since this is based on rewrites of the original 302 that can't be found, WHY THE FUCK DO YOU THINK HE DIDNT????

1
skumario 1 point ago +1 / -0

His subordinate Ezra Cohen was in the office at the time of Flynn's interview with the two scumbag FBI agents. It beggars belief why Flynn would be alone with those two crooks. He should have either declined or had his counsel in there with him.

5
Beaker999 5 points ago +5 / -0

And Powell AG!

4
Johnfox13 4 points ago +4 / -0

No end the fbi

4
MisterDestination 4 points ago +4 / -0

Disband the FBI and CIA and other subversive three letter agencies and unions. Then defund Marxist schools that are traitors.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

Here’s the law on this for inquiring minds; it does require Senate approval:

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-5-government-organization-and-employees/5-usc-sect-3345.html

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I could go for CIA, too. In fact, I agree it would make more sense 😇

Again, it was mostly hyperbole.

0
EdisonHwy 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hogwash

2
innominata 2 points ago +2 / -0

But can he get security clearance? I haven't found any technical reason he can't, but it does require a lot of background checks which could be returned negative because of this?

1
DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

POTUS has the ultimate say as to whether or not to grant an individual’s security clearance or revoke it.

3
SF_3P0 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, CIA. Clean house.

2
ExtraFreedomPlease 2 points ago +2 / -0

OMG I LOVE IT!! GREAT IDEA!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do not believe that there is anything limiting this scenario. It was mostly hyperbole but there isn’t anything in the Constitution that I’m aware of that would stop it.

You can serve in Congress if you have a felony.

3
josiborg 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a prerequisite for Congress

1
innominata 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you get security clearance tho?

2
MAGA_Master 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can’t tell me there are many folks in government with felonies that have security clearances.

1
DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

POTUS has the ultimate say as to whether or not to grant an individual’s security clearance or revoke it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
jake_from_state_farm 1 point ago +1 / -0

IDK. People are saying he can't but I haven't found proof yet.

3
DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

He can. Most people make false assumptions.

2
jake_from_state_farm 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I was thinking because he was never convicted and they dropped the charges.

3
DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

There’s just not anything in the Constitution or USC that state otherwise.

We’ve never had a President with a Felon but it’s legal (if it were to present itself)

3
jake_from_state_farm 3 points ago +3 / -0

I searched for the history of pardons and government qualifications, etc. Flynn isn't a felon. But I understand what you are saying! Thank you!

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
1
Two_Scoops__ 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nope. He's fully cleared like he never did anything

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

You haven’t supported anything you’re saying with evidence or legal precedence.

Leave shill.

We operate on facts. Not emotion.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, I mean. You haven’t substantiated anything.

What DO YOU KNOW?

This is basics , brah!