455 FIRE WRAY NOW! MAKE FLYNN FBI HEAD! posted 143 days ago by DJTMAGA4LIFE 143 days ago by DJTMAGA4LIFE +455 / -0 Hell Yeah! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 39 comments share 39 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (39) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 3 ▼ – DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 3 points 143 days ago +4 / -1 Here’s the law on this for inquiring minds; it does require Senate approval: https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-5-government-organization-and-employees/5-usc-sect-3345.html permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 143 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 2 points 143 days ago +2 / -0 I could go for CIA, too. In fact, I agree it would make more sense 😇 Again, it was mostly hyperbole. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – EdisonHwy 0 points 143 days ago +1 / -1 Hogwash permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – innominata 2 points 143 days ago +2 / -0 But can he get security clearance? I haven't found any technical reason he can't, but it does require a lot of background checks which could be returned negative because of this? permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – DJTMAGA4LIFE [S] 1 point 143 days ago +1 / -0 POTUS has the ultimate say as to whether or not to grant an individual’s security clearance or revoke it. permalink parent save report block reply
Here’s the law on this for inquiring minds; it does require Senate approval:
https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-5-government-organization-and-employees/5-usc-sect-3345.html
I could go for CIA, too. In fact, I agree it would make more sense 😇
Again, it was mostly hyperbole.
Hogwash
But can he get security clearance? I haven't found any technical reason he can't, but it does require a lot of background checks which could be returned negative because of this?
POTUS has the ultimate say as to whether or not to grant an individual’s security clearance or revoke it.