12963
Comments (1472)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
15
brassmule 15 points ago +16 / -1

I can see how that would line up, and it would explain why the judge was so eager to literally prosecute the case himself so as to delay its inevitable end.

The pardon is odd to me considering that Flynn never broke the law. Of what did he get pardoned, exactly?

Perhaps this was simply a move to remove roadblocks from Durham.

13
pmurTJdlanoD 13 points ago +13 / -0

Probably pardoned of the guilty plea he retracted but was being prosecuted by the judge for cause the plaintiff dropped the case. <~ That absolute clusterfuck of a sentence is what the left does to our institutions.

5
MAGA_Master 5 points ago +5 / -0

Which is crazy. What was he even pardoned for? The case was dropped by the plaintiff. He was pardoned from jerk judges?

4
AtariArtist 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's like the Nixon pardon. It precludes any criminal charges in the future (I think - depends on how it's worded on paper - and even then I'd have to double-check but Nixon wasn't indicted on anything because he resigned ahead of Congress finishing their votes on the matter - but it absolved him of any future entanglements with the charges involved).

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0