2040
Comments (64)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
brogarn 11 points ago +11 / -0

No, now they're saying it was a heeeeeeeeeaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrinnnggg and not a court of law and these people wouldn't say this stuff under oath. Never mind that it's all sworn testimony. They'll keep moving those goalposts.

8
CisSiberianOrchestra [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Those idiots don't realize that the sworn testimony by the witnesses is admissible as evidence in court.