10872
Comments (4284)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-6
deleted -6 points ago +6 / -12
1
cdnthought 1 point ago +1 / -0

This looks to be designed to allow emergency relief and discovery, which would allow them to get past the "sue them with affidavits" stage and move to criminal proceedings. They have evidence, they are now going after the proof.

4
eddedandedamame 4 points ago +4 / -0

And in civil filings, you don't need to prove bribery was intentional or played a role in changing the outcome to request and win remedy. Rather, evidence of bribery in and of it self will contribute to the preponderance of evidence in this case and that seems to be the strategy here.

[Not a lawyer]

4
_Donald-Trump_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

This has nothing to do with the money. This is merely a case to immediately invalidate the election. The election is the priority because it is time sensitive. All the other stuff comes later after the election is sorted.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
5
eddedandedamame 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is a civil filing. Charging individuals with the goal of punishment would need to be filed as a criminal complaint.

Evidence of bribes and corruption can be introduced here as supporting evidence that something did in fact occur that must be remedied by decertification... But I don't think bribery can be filed as a complaint in a civil case with requested remedy of criminal penalty.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0