Through creatively tweaking the oval coverage threshold settings it should be possible to set thresholds in such a way that a non-trivial amount of ballots are marked "problem ballots" and sent to the "NotCastImages" folder.
It is possible for an administrator of the ImageCast Central work station to view all images of scanned ballots which were deemed "problem ballots" by simply navigating via the standard "Windows File Explorer" to the folder named
"NotCastImages" which holds ballot scans of "problem ballots".
It is possible for an administrator of the "ImageCast Central" workstation to view and delete any individual ballot scans from the "NotCastImages" folder by simply using the standard Windows delete and recycle bin functions provided by the Windows 10 Pro operating system.
This is the part that I don’t understand. If they did a hand count would they have found those? I mean they wouldn’t know which ballots fell into that category but I would think the numbers would have been changed. I have tried to get answers on that but haven’t heard anything concrete yet.
I think this is why the counting is so slow in the trouble states. If the settings were kept at the same tolerance, the votes thrown in the folder could be deleted again in the recount.
This is how the bulk of votes were switched.
Through creatively tweaking the oval coverage threshold settings it should be possible to set thresholds in such a way that a non-trivial amount of ballots are marked "problem ballots" and sent to the "NotCastImages" folder.
It is possible for an administrator of the ImageCast Central work station to view all images of scanned ballots which were deemed "problem ballots" by simply navigating via the standard "Windows File Explorer" to the folder named "NotCastImages" which holds ballot scans of "problem ballots".
It is possible for an administrator of the "ImageCast Central" workstation to view and delete any individual ballot scans from the "NotCastImages" folder by simply using the standard Windows delete and recycle bin functions provided by the Windows 10 Pro operating system.
This is the part that I don’t understand. If they did a hand count would they have found those? I mean they wouldn’t know which ballots fell into that category but I would think the numbers would have been changed. I have tried to get answers on that but haven’t heard anything concrete yet.
I think this is why the counting is so slow in the trouble states. If the settings were kept at the same tolerance, the votes thrown in the folder could be deleted again in the recount.