Braynard's 20K voting from out of state is enough by itself to invalidate the GA election. Page 2: As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of. the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i] was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] voters would have voted if their [absentee] ballots had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.”
Braynard's 20K voting from out of state is enough by itself to invalidate the GA election. Page 2: As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of. the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i] was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] voters would have voted if their [absentee] ballots had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.”