10872
Comments (4284)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
121
merelymeek 121 points ago +123 / -2

Many of us are wondering how this is going to play out in the courts. SCOTUS will not "appoint" the president. SCOTUS will determine that the election results violate the Constitution and invalidate any fraudulent electoral college certifications.

SCOTUS cases do not prove is disprove facts. That is why THE KRAKEN is being released in the lower courts. The SCOTUS is designed to take cases where facts have already been sufficiently proven (or disproven) in the lower courts and make a determination on whether or not the lower court rulings were Constitutional.

The key is providing evidence of statistical impossibility in the election results which can later be presented to SCOTUS. The 14th amendment dictates that voters are entitled to DUE PROCESS to be eligible or ineligible to vote. Widespread election fraud that invalidates hundreds of thousands or millions of votes robs voters of their due process and is a violation of the 14th amendment. SCOTUS will then make a determination on whether or not the evidence is sufficient enough that one or multiple electoral college certifications is in violation the 14th amendment.

When SCOTUS determines that certifications violate the 14th amendment and enough electoral college certifications are thrown out that neither candidate reaches the 270 threshold, then the electoral college will be bypassed and the Congress will hold a "contingent election" to vote on who is the next president. In a contingent election the representatives of each state will have one vote and the Republicans currently have the majority (26-23).

This has happened 3 times (1801, 1825, 1837).

IANAL and if anyone wants to correct me or clarify please do. Either way, the key is PROVING THE STATISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY of the supposed election results. We do that, we win.

3
Cbllbc 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for the writeup. I have some dumb questions :

  1. Aren't there two representatives per state? What happens if a state is split on votes, is it half a point?
  2. Excluding split states, I'm counting it as 22-19 for Trump at the moment.
  3. Utah is a split state in my calculation because, you know, traitors.
  4. Also, is it the current members who vote or the ones based on this election?
  5. Bernie is one of the independents in this. Do you think Bernie will vote for himself? He can still win the 2016 election??? Kek.
5
finnabeouf 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're thinking of senators, not representatives