10872
Comments (4284)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
19
Tiggs999 19 points ago +19 / -0

There was no integrity of the paper ballots. The signatures weren’t matched for a reason. The paper ballots could easily been manipulated to match the Dominion manipulation. In fact that is the sole reason why the basic principle of ballot integrity, matching signatures was ignored. Fuck anyone who tries to justify not matching signatures on ballot. It’s simple math on how many ballots were required. In fact I would say election officials who support not checking signatures are complicit in election fraud and are on Dominion payroll. Everywhere the monitors were kept away and or signatures weren’t matched on ballots, Dominion fraud took place. Fuck you for bringing up the matching ballot count without bringing up the obvious flaw in that argument.

10
slaphappy2 10 points ago +10 / -0

The basic concept is simple here. The election officials expect the public to accept that they are doing a lawful and good job at running an election system.

But once evidence starts to pile up that many things are wrong and smell bad - at that point you have to stop and take the time to go through every ballot, check every signature, make sure that the ballots were cast by legitimate voters and were not tampered with.

Anybody who disagrees with this basic concept is acting in bad faith by definition.

2
pepperconchobhar 2 points ago +2 / -0

The destruction of the envelopes and the signatures voided Georgia's entire election, IMHO. Those are supposed to be kept safe by the government for 22 months, by law, and the people who deliberately broke that law need to prosecuted.

2
slaphappy2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup. You have to have the physical ballots ( including envelopes, signatures and everything else required by law ).

Otherwise, if an audit is ordered - "The dog ate my homework" is not a legally adequate excuse.