Opposing counsel may have a tough time with the fact that democrats themselves (Warren, Klobuchar, Abrams, et al) heavily criticized Dominion.
Defendant Governor Brian Kemp (Governor of Georgia) is named
herein in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Georgia. On or
about June 9, 2019, Governor Kemp bought the new Dominion Voting
Systems for Georgia, budgeting 150 million dollars for the machines. Critics
are quoted, “Led by Abrams, Democrats fought the legislation and pointed to
cybersecurity experts who warned it would leave Georgia's elections
susceptible to hacking and tampering.” And “Just this week, the Fair Fight
voting rights group started by [Stacy] Abrams launched a television ad
critical of the bill. In a statement Thursday, the group called it “corruption at
its worst” and a waste of money on “hackable voting machines.”7
That's true in a political argument but not in a legal one.
There are plenty of cases where you can find some 10 Republicans who side with the Democrats.
Also remember that in cases like the one against the DNC where they rigged the primary, their legal argument in court was "we can rig it if we want to"
Opposing counsel may have a tough time with the fact that democrats themselves (Warren, Klobuchar, Abrams, et al) heavily criticized Dominion.
Defendant Governor Brian Kemp (Governor of Georgia) is named herein in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Georgia. On or about June 9, 2019, Governor Kemp bought the new Dominion Voting Systems for Georgia, budgeting 150 million dollars for the machines. Critics are quoted, “Led by Abrams, Democrats fought the legislation and pointed to cybersecurity experts who warned it would leave Georgia's elections susceptible to hacking and tampering.” And “Just this week, the Fair Fight voting rights group started by [Stacy] Abrams launched a television ad critical of the bill. In a statement Thursday, the group called it “corruption at its worst” and a waste of money on “hackable voting machines.”7
That's true in a political argument but not in a legal one.
There are plenty of cases where you can find some 10 Republicans who side with the Democrats.
Also remember that in cases like the one against the DNC where they rigged the primary, their legal argument in court was "we can rig it if we want to"
Agreed. I am not a legal scholar, but since this is a civil lawsuit, could the primary goal be discovery?
If the person is accused of fraud, the discovery process can also become fraudulent, no?
DNC is a private org and can decide their nominee in the primaries any way they like, including cheating/ignoring the votes.
This was a Federal election - they sure as shit are not supposed to game that.
I'm not saying they will make the same argument. I'm saying legal and political arguments are different.
You can't argue "even democrats agree with us therefore the facts can't be challenged by opposing counsel". That's not a legal argument.