Quit focusing on the two typos in beginning if you read this. This is a very well written document and it's clear this is basically just a introduction to her lawsuit. She has plaintiffs named, exhibits for evidence, excerpts showing conflict of law , etc. The next step is to get the judge to agree to a discovery stage and then trial. On its face if he agrees to this the vote should not be certified till legal proceedings conclude
Open Document, hit Control-A ... notice that highlight break on the 2nd line between "DISTRCO" and "ICT" to say "DISTRCO ICT"?
That says the OCR software had a "mental dominion" and read from another line and didn't catch itself!
You (likely) should find it on all other spelling mistakes or grammatical errors.
Quit focusing on the two typos in beginning if you read this. This is a very well written document and it's clear this is basically just a introduction to her lawsuit. She has plaintiffs named, exhibits for evidence, excerpts showing conflict of law , etc. The next step is to get the judge to agree to a discovery stage and then trial. On its face if he agrees to this the vote should not be certified till legal proceedings conclude
They are spamming it, but no offense to people who don't realize this, those aren't typos, but OCR scanning errors.
No offense taken. For those of us who don’t know about OCR scabbing how can we tell in the future?
Open Document, hit Control-A ... notice that highlight break on the 2nd line between "DISTRCO" and "ICT" to say "DISTRCO ICT"?
That says the OCR software had a "mental dominion" and read from another line and didn't catch itself! You (likely) should find it on all other spelling mistakes or grammatical errors.