Anytime I have to OCR a scan at work, I get the same thing. It’s a mess. And obviously the website that released it isn’t going to go through and correct all the errors which is what you have to do after you OCR something. A complete mess.
The Michigan filing is a formatting mess due to this. No way did they file it that way.
Hope you are right. My misunderstanding was thinking this was sourced directly from the filing party. Though if it wasn’t, I’m still confused as to how it would have instantly been made available to third parties if it was submitted via paper at midnight.
I believe that’s where this third party website comes in. They don’t have access to the original, they are using something to pull it off of submissions. But I’m not technical enough to understand Scraper and whatever else. Just passing along the info I’ve read.
I’m gonna be looking totally hungover at dinner today from staying up reading all of this.
And it’s not court reporter website, it’s court listener. So they are the ones who pulled and have it out there. Go read the Michigan one. You’ll see all thr massive formatting issues and such.
This was not released by the parties to the suit. This was released by a website that pulls scans. Let me go find the comment. Happy Thanksgiving.
BTW the website this is hosted on is literally her website. Go to the home page.
K Gotcha. More plausible. Though I have never seen these types of artifacts in digitized scans.
Anytime I have to OCR a scan at work, I get the same thing. It’s a mess. And obviously the website that released it isn’t going to go through and correct all the errors which is what you have to do after you OCR something. A complete mess.
The Michigan filing is a formatting mess due to this. No way did they file it that way.
Hope you are right. My misunderstanding was thinking this was sourced directly from the filing party. Though if it wasn’t, I’m still confused as to how it would have instantly been made available to third parties if it was submitted via paper at midnight.
I believe that’s where this third party website comes in. They don’t have access to the original, they are using something to pull it off of submissions. But I’m not technical enough to understand Scraper and whatever else. Just passing along the info I’ve read.
I’m gonna be looking totally hungover at dinner today from staying up reading all of this.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS7dT9IH/x/c/4DpKmcWm91J
And it’s not court reporter website, it’s court listener. So they are the ones who pulled and have it out there. Go read the Michigan one. You’ll see all thr massive formatting issues and such.