Ok but did you actually listen to some of Barnes critiques? If I'm hearing arguments..you already have me when you bring the mathematician in. It at least warrants an audit. The. You start talking about chavez and all that other stuff...it's distracting.
But this is the thing - there is something you are demonstrating - the part of you says it's distracting. Maybe you are right to a degree. Consider, all the courts are aware of this as well. Talk about a distraction...for them. Meaning, they must be thinking better not let Powell's way be the way the election is decided because that is going to be the UGLY way.
So result is that ruling in favor of Trump in the simple issues becomes the most palatable outcome.
Hope so. Our republic depends on it and frankly so does every other republic or representative democracy. Should this come out in our favor...it will show that despite the globalists throwing everything including the kitchen sink at us, they failed. It will break their spine. That's crucial for a lot of elections next year in a lot of jurisdictions which, frankly,the safeguards against tyranny are much weaker. Next year Canada has elections if I'm not mistaken. France has elections. Italy has elections. Germany has elections (there's a guy in Merkels Party who wants to reverse course and might even work with the AfD. Call him the Trump of Germany). Score enough successes and Soon organizations like the EU, the WTO, the UN etc all begin to die off.
I think Barnes has valid concerns about Q and Venezuela and sounding too Conspiratorial.
I also think he's wrong. All of this is part of the story and biggere picture about Dominion and Smartmatic.
It DOES make the case less focused, and there is an argument for leaving it out, however, I think it ultimately provides important context into the nefarious nature of this.
You LITERALLY have the CEO of Smartmatic admitting on video that over a million votes were changed to Chavez.
If there wasn't good evidence of this narrative maybe I'd agree with Barnes, but I think he's wrong.
They dont put specific proof in a filing. In this case particularly alot of these accusations have serious national security implications. Im thinking you are a shill or just that silly.
Are you talking about twitter whore Robert Barnes who never represented any of the Covington kids as he so originally claimed?
I wouldn't use Robert Barnes as a source to discredit Sidney Powell. That's pretty much the funniest thing I read.
Ok but did you actually listen to some of Barnes critiques? If I'm hearing arguments..you already have me when you bring the mathematician in. It at least warrants an audit. The. You start talking about chavez and all that other stuff...it's distracting.
Barnes is a poseur. Powell is the real deal.
Facts include Chavez.
But this is the thing - there is something you are demonstrating - the part of you says it's distracting. Maybe you are right to a degree. Consider, all the courts are aware of this as well. Talk about a distraction...for them. Meaning, they must be thinking better not let Powell's way be the way the election is decided because that is going to be the UGLY way.
So result is that ruling in favor of Trump in the simple issues becomes the most palatable outcome.
So I will upvote you. Because we will win.
Hope so. Our republic depends on it and frankly so does every other republic or representative democracy. Should this come out in our favor...it will show that despite the globalists throwing everything including the kitchen sink at us, they failed. It will break their spine. That's crucial for a lot of elections next year in a lot of jurisdictions which, frankly,the safeguards against tyranny are much weaker. Next year Canada has elections if I'm not mistaken. France has elections. Italy has elections. Germany has elections (there's a guy in Merkels Party who wants to reverse course and might even work with the AfD. Call him the Trump of Germany). Score enough successes and Soon organizations like the EU, the WTO, the UN etc all begin to die off.
I think Barnes has valid concerns about Q and Venezuela and sounding too Conspiratorial.
I also think he's wrong. All of this is part of the story and biggere picture about Dominion and Smartmatic.
It DOES make the case less focused, and there is an argument for leaving it out, however, I think it ultimately provides important context into the nefarious nature of this.
You LITERALLY have the CEO of Smartmatic admitting on video that over a million votes were changed to Chavez.
If there wasn't good evidence of this narrative maybe I'd agree with Barnes, but I think he's wrong.
Not true because it shows foreign actors meddling in our elections, completely going against the 2018 executive order.
Noooo.... It claims those things.... She has yet to actually provide proof of it....
Here's one of hundreds of affidavits that shows the collusion with China and Iran: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf
They dont put specific proof in a filing. In this case particularly alot of these accusations have serious national security implications. Im thinking you are a shill or just that silly.