290
Comments (36)
sorted by:
16
fapoo 16 points ago +16 / -0

I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.

16
CryHavoc 16 points ago +16 / -0

WOW! That affidavit is NUCLEAR!

14
FAKEFOXNEWS98 [S] 14 points ago +14 / -0

In particular, I have seen USIC intelligence reports showing China’s espionage activities in the United States and efforts to infiltrate elections. Since these countries are our enemies, I conclude that FIS and other operators were involved to influence the outcome of the 2020 election

5
ikuyas 5 points ago +5 / -0

what is FIS

6
Warren_Puffitt 6 points ago +6 / -0

Foreign Intelligence Service

13
Pedrohk 13 points ago +13 / -0

Trump's executive order from 2018 is in play.

6
Carter_Druse 6 points ago +6 / -0

MOAB for sure.

But is there a typo here?

"The data distribution is statistically congruent, even when considering a larger number of absentee ballots were collected for Vice President Biden."

Does he mean "incongruent"?

3
Wtf_socialismreally 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are a lot of spelling mistakes for sure, like "decleration".

Focusing on those a bit too much though.

9
moonstreams 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's an OCR scan (image to text)

3
Wtf_socialismreally 3 points ago +3 / -0

Then typos make a lot more sense, thanks for clearing that up.

-13
clintonsserver -13 points ago +6 / -19

There are MANY spelling mistakes and it's embarrassing.

13
Vla1ne 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's only embarrassing if the testimony is fake. This was a legal document that would normally take over a month to prepare, done in under 3 weeks, that's an impressive level of effort. A few spelling errors are not deal breakers.

3
sunsetlament 3 points ago +5 / -2

There are a thousand first year law students that would cut off their right arm to spellcheck her legal filings. There really is no excuse for the volume of spelling errors. Hell, I've been a lawyer for 20 years and I'd spellcheck these filings for free just for the experience and the chance to say I worked on the case.

3
DigitalWarrior 3 points ago +4 / -1

There is an excuse.

You’re seeing automatically scanned documents, not the submitted originals. This uses optical character recognition (OCR) and it makes mistakes as it interprets the text. The court has the originals which likely don’t contain these mistakes. OCR is know to read things wrong. You use OCR then you have to go back and fix all the things it translated incorrectly.

1
sunsetlament 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not. Most courts require digital filing now. And we know that's true in this instance because she filed at midnight.

1
Vla1ne 1 point ago +1 / -0

As long as the facts are good, they can check all the spelling at a later date. This was a fast file on a deadline with a lightspeed case. Normally i'd grammar nazi it, but the substance is what matters here.

2
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 2 points ago +2 / -0

With a skeleton crew.

Powell and her team have been working crazy hours. And there are plenty of spelling errors in legal documents. Not unprecedented.

5
DigitalWarrior 5 points ago +5 / -0

You’re seeing automatically scanned documents, not the submitted originals. This uses optical character recognition (OCR) and it makes mistakes as it interprets the text. The court has the originals which likely don’t contain these mistakes. OCR is know to read things wrong. You use OCR then you have to go back and fix all the things it translated incorrectly.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
Bravo1 4 points ago +4 / -0

So Assange was right on this the whole time

3
SomeoneInHouston 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. Don't know why Trump hasn't gotten him to the U.S. Even for some Seth Rich closure.

4
bowlympicshero 4 points ago +4 / -0

MOAB

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
darkhorsereddit3 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh shit

3
Schroeder09 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's awesome. Looks like he's got the credentials to make this credible. Why haven't they siezed a machine yet though? Couldn't any of these states have given them access? Don't WI, MI, and PA have lunatic leftist activist executives (the latter 2 being the worst), but AZ and GA don't. If kemp would say they can't look at the machine that'd be a big red flag considering his behavior through this all. The AZ governor halted certification I thought? So he's at least kinda helpful or pretending to be.

They wouldn't even need a subpoena to look at the machines in those scenarios, would they? Correct me if I'm wrong and tell me how obtaining the system would work? If the states don't object all powell had to do is make s simple call and request with her software experts to go look and actually analyze the machines I'd think.

If I'm right, why hasn't that been done?that'd be monumental too. I understand the evidence was purposefully destroyed or not kept by way of changing software to NOT keep the scanned "receipt" of the ballot, but his statement references a lot of " past back doors" that he " does not believe" to have been remedied since their exposure in 2018 and 2019. Had they just went and looked at one of these machines in one of those states he could at least VERIFY some of these claims. Why wasn't that done? Also, we've been told these were used in 28 states. If not one of these battle ground states, surely one of these other states using the dominion machines would have been friendly enough to let powell and IT experts look at a machine to gather evidence for testimony.

What am I missing? I don't understand why they didn't have a machine on 11-4-2020.

2
Excavator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are the machines the property of those companies not the state? Something about it not being open source coding. Idk what that means necessarily.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
OfurPhuksake001 3 points ago +3 / -0

Step by step, the filthy Demofascists and their vile enablers will be erased from decent society.

3
mrsucko 3 points ago +3 / -0

Archived link, please? Website isn't loading for me.

Edit: I created one here: https://archive.is/BU2bz

2
Vla1ne 2 points ago +2 / -0

I suggest downloading it for reading later:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18693929/1/19/king-v-whitmer/

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Danny1878 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link not working anymore - is there a backup?

2
2
Danny1878 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks.

3
Vla1ne 3 points ago +3 / -0

No problem. Always willing to arm fellow pedes with knowledge.