"It is time – past time – to make plain that, while the pandemic poses many grave challenges, there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores and bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues, and mosques,"
It's just a feeling based on what she wrote about Justice Kavanaugh's confirmation and her close friendship with Justice Anton Scalia. I grew up with liberals that loved America RBG was that type of liberal. If she saw the level of corruption that all of America sees now I'm not so sure that she wouldn't have been happy with President Trump appointing her replacement.
I've never bought into the deathbed wish of RBG, and the thing that keeps sticking in my mind is whenever the Dem starts screaming about something the opposite is true.
My theory is the opposite: That her suffering from TDS shortened her lifespan just enough so she could step off into hell and let a sane person finally take over her job.
I think she dropped dead just before the impeachment sham, and they kept her on ice/released the news thinking that he wouldn’t appoint a new justice in September of an election year.
They should. She just hadddd to remain on the bench. She could have easily stepped down during Obama's "reign" and spent her last years in comfort but they got cocky and she valued her own importance and perceived power over her comfort. I truly believe it all was providential.
After hearing accounts of how the bribery and blackmail game is played in DC (it's wayyy dirtier than I ever imagined)...I'm convinced he's compromised.
Well, the 1040 form from years ago after Obamacare was enacted is really when I started watching this guy. Remember, Roberts was the asshole who stated that the ACA was constitutional and good to go.
This is such a trip to read. Its so over the top its like fiction. Do you think this has credibility?
Like the author is the dude from overstock.com. In this article alone, he was tasked by the fbi to lead a sting on hillary clinton in 2015.
Then they told him to can it and that the plan was hillary was going to be obama's puppet when she got elected and michelle was going to take over for her.
Then the overstock.com is granted a letter of near legal immunity to pursue the deepstate.
He paints a picture that the gov has people who are fighting the deepstate - like fbi and in doj, so where the fuck were these people last 4 years.
Roberts was never on our side. This just proves why ACB's nomination was so crucial. If that ghoul RBG were still alive, it'd have been 5-4 the other way.
An innocent man cannot be manipulated as easy as a guilty man period laws are passed to make everybody guilty of something, and the man of morality can be influenced out of that guilt. Maybe he has morality, maybe he doesn't. He did something that he knew to be illegal, and as a judge that makes him as malleable as a wet sponge by those who would seek to destroy him. His fear of being exposed as a fraud when he's the Chief Justice of the supreme Court means that he will go to any length to hide exposure
Conservatives are never allowed to have a strong, effective working majority on the court. As soon as it happens, one or more go squishy and slide to the left.
“Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging...the right of the people to peacefully assemble” - 1st amendment.
That is crystal clear. Literally could not be any clearer. How can anyone possibly believe a law limiting or forbidding church services complies with the 1st amendment? There is not even an argument to be made. It CLEARLY is unconstitutional and yet 4 Supreme Court justices ruled it is constitutional. If you think that is constitutional then you think nothing is unconstitutional.
That's what I don't understand about SCOTUS and people trying to pick liberal or conservative judges. At the end of the day, in theory they should all rule with the constitution unless the issue is vague in the constitution. Yet this case is a cut and dry.
I just don't get it! I wonder if we get hear why each judge voted that way.
So pretty much the reason some said NO is because those two religious institutions we're not in Governor Cuomo's red zone. Essentially they didn't have the restriction of how many people anymore. That's the main reason they said it's useless to rule with the injunction. Altho Cuomo can always change this.
The other judges highlighted how it's ok to go to a bike shop, weed shop, and other essential places with a big capacity yet restrictions when it comes to religion, this violates the First amendment. And that things can change as their ruling is only for a temp injunction. Roberts seemed to agree with them but only ruled NO because NY moved these two religious institutions out of the restricted red zone. So I'm guessing if governor cu-homo still had the restrictions it would probably be 8-1 or 7-2. But these losers and traitors won't rule on this unconstitutional act because the governor decided to change the restriction in the middle of the review. They should know better that the governor anytime can change it back again, hence it needs a ruling now. Fake judges.
As it becomes more and more clear that the SCOTUS will be hearing 2020 Election cases, I hope this decision eases some fears about ACB being "compromised," "easily bullied," or whatever other stupid shit many of you have been saying.
If you all actually believe GEOTUS is a 4D chess master (he is) who had the foresight to know a couple years ago that this was how the election was going to play out (seems likely, considering his 2018 post-election actions), I would hazard to guess that his pre-nomination interview with ACB probably covered this very topic.
A lot of people here get all nervous about Gorsuch and Kavanaugh unnecessarily, also. I think they have each sided with Democrats on a case or two. People forget - the court is not a "left or right" body (though it is framed that way by most everybody), but a "constitutional or not" body. If they can justify their opinions in that context I have no issue with any justice "siding against" their party.
I agree he’s a scum bag, but there is a bright point with roberts voting with the other side. If he votes with the majority he is the ranking member and get to write a wishy washy majority opinion. With him not voting with them I believe justice Thomas is ranking member and can right the opinion like it should be. Just my two cents
This is part of their plan.... SCOTUS gives Trump the win. MSM screams it's all because of ACB and that "even republican Roberts is against it." And they will riot
Roberts ( among many others) was compromised by the HMR surveillance system. They fear President Trump because they don’t have ANYTHING on him.. zero,nada,zilch.
Roberts is getting impeached in the near future. That’s probably why Trump kept saying he’d get one or two more picks in a second term. Senate better do their job and get rid of this RINO cuck John Roberts.
Roberts is a Democrat. Forget about him.
Expect him to join the other three traitors in all the upcoming election fraud cases.
We still win 5-4, thanks to Ginsburg having the common decency to drop dead during Trump's first term.
RBG is a true American hero for dropping dead exactly at the right moment
It's not impossible that deep inside her twisted progressive mind - there was a core of subconscious patriotism.
Nah, I would find rather likely that God and Death are both MAGA and they double teamed her
Whatever. Either way works for me.
All you need to know
There's a chance RBG knew exactly what she was doing. Sometime read what she wrote about what happened to Justice Kavanaugh it's illuminating.
It's just a feeling based on what she wrote about Justice Kavanaugh's confirmation and her close friendship with Justice Anton Scalia. I grew up with liberals that loved America RBG was that type of liberal. If she saw the level of corruption that all of America sees now I'm not so sure that she wouldn't have been happy with President Trump appointing her replacement.
I've never bought into the deathbed wish of RBG, and the thing that keeps sticking in my mind is whenever the Dem starts screaming about something the opposite is true.
There's no proof it's just a well reasoned guess.
My theory is the opposite: That her suffering from TDS shortened her lifespan just enough so she could step off into hell and let a sane person finally take over her job.
And that core was a blood clot, so really we should be all thanking God
huge chance she died months before and libtards just couldnt keep it hidden for that long
exactly, the time she was admitted to the hospital was the last time she was alive. Everything else was a body double to keep the charade going.
I think she dropped dead just before the impeachment sham, and they kept her on ice/released the news thinking that he wouldn’t appoint a new justice in September of an election year.
She’s a cunt, but she a hero of a cunt.
Ginsburg is truly a hero. God bless her
its funny to think the far left HATES her because she died at the wrong time.
They should. She just hadddd to remain on the bench. She could have easily stepped down during Obama's "reign" and spent her last years in comfort but they got cocky and she valued her own importance and perceived power over her comfort. I truly believe it all was providential.
He's more like a RINO swamp kind of guy, imho.
Whatever labels and/or verbiage floats your boat.
After hearing accounts of how the bribery and blackmail game is played in DC (it's wayyy dirtier than I ever imagined)...I'm convinced he's compromised.
Well, the 1040 form from years ago after Obamacare was enacted is really when I started watching this guy. Remember, Roberts was the asshole who stated that the ACA was constitutional and good to go.
Sure here's an account by Patrick Byrne, founder of Overstock.com: https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/10/finale-the-deep-states-hillary-clinton-bribery-blackmail-sting-the-maria-butina-rape-murder-gambit/
This is just the tip of the ice Berg but you can see the antics in play.
This is such a trip to read. Its so over the top its like fiction. Do you think this has credibility?
Like the author is the dude from overstock.com. In this article alone, he was tasked by the fbi to lead a sting on hillary clinton in 2015.
Then they told him to can it and that the plan was hillary was going to be obama's puppet when she got elected and michelle was going to take over for her.
Then the overstock.com is granted a letter of near legal immunity to pursue the deepstate.
He paints a picture that the gov has people who are fighting the deepstate - like fbi and in doj, so where the fuck were these people last 4 years.
Yes, I think he is legit. It's backed up by Sara Carter https://saraacarter.com/russia-probe-twist-a-billion-dollar-ceo-a-convicted-russian-agent-and-the-fbi/ it's consistent with the interviews he's given on television programs over the years (even going back to 2006 and the SEC probe, which you can look up on YouTube).
Even Warren Buffett vouches for him: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/maria-butina-russia-spy-fbi-860256/
And yes, it does read like fiction but I believe it is the truth.
There are good people there are bad people and there are neutral people in the bureaucracy who just try to get along.
The deep state has had bad people in the highest echelons for too long. That has to change for things to change.
Roberts was never on our side. This just proves why ACB's nomination was so crucial. If that ghoul RBG were still alive, it'd have been 5-4 the other way.
It's so silly that we have to have a 6-3 majority just to have a 5-4 majority on the supreme court.
WHO'S TAKING BETS THAT JUSTICE ROBERTS TURN COATS WHEN THE KRACKEN HITS THE SCOTUS?
Wouldn't that mean that he joins the conservative side for once?
We're already counting on that. That's why ACB's such a big deal.
He was on Epsteins plane.
i dont think thats it
https://thedonald.win/p/HEbsTl2a/x/c/16amdO0Ww4
He's a cuck. we need employ the powers of 4chan to find his weakness and get him removed.
He illegally adopted his kids, the youngest of 16 and that's what they keep using against him.
An innocent man cannot be manipulated as easy as a guilty man period laws are passed to make everybody guilty of something, and the man of morality can be influenced out of that guilt. Maybe he has morality, maybe he doesn't. He did something that he knew to be illegal, and as a judge that makes him as malleable as a wet sponge by those who would seek to destroy him. His fear of being exposed as a fraud when he's the Chief Justice of the supreme Court means that he will go to any length to hide exposure
Thereby exposing him as a fraud anyway.
Has to be something more serious than that too
An illegal adoption wouldn't net him about 15 years. Besides murder, not too much more than could be serious.
You can not imagine how much I want to see proof come to light showing the John Roberts in the Epstein flight logs is in fact this John Roberts!
https://thedonald.win/p/HEbsTl2a/x/c/16amdO0Ww4
Thanks, interesting, hadn't seen this!
Conservatives are never allowed to have a strong, effective working majority on the court. As soon as it happens, one or more go squishy and slide to the left.
Same with Mitt Romney. Don't for a second count him as a Republican when measuring whether we keep control of the senate.
“Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging...the right of the people to peacefully assemble” - 1st amendment.
That is crystal clear. Literally could not be any clearer. How can anyone possibly believe a law limiting or forbidding church services complies with the 1st amendment? There is not even an argument to be made. It CLEARLY is unconstitutional and yet 4 Supreme Court justices ruled it is constitutional. If you think that is constitutional then you think nothing is unconstitutional.
That's what I don't understand about SCOTUS and people trying to pick liberal or conservative judges. At the end of the day, in theory they should all rule with the constitution unless the issue is vague in the constitution. Yet this case is a cut and dry.
I just don't get it! I wonder if we get hear why each judge voted that way.
Edit: cool so each judge does explain their reason on their ruling. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf
So pretty much the reason some said NO is because those two religious institutions we're not in Governor Cuomo's red zone. Essentially they didn't have the restriction of how many people anymore. That's the main reason they said it's useless to rule with the injunction. Altho Cuomo can always change this.
The other judges highlighted how it's ok to go to a bike shop, weed shop, and other essential places with a big capacity yet restrictions when it comes to religion, this violates the First amendment. And that things can change as their ruling is only for a temp injunction. Roberts seemed to agree with them but only ruled NO because NY moved these two religious institutions out of the restricted red zone. So I'm guessing if governor cu-homo still had the restrictions it would probably be 8-1 or 7-2. But these losers and traitors won't rule on this unconstitutional act because the governor decided to change the restriction in the middle of the review. They should know better that the governor anytime can change it back again, hence it needs a ruling now. Fake judges.
Was the "red zone" in America? Seems like shit fluff to me.
Ny governor created different color zones depending how severe the virus is and each zone had different restrictions.
Treason.
Roberts cant be considered to be on our side.. This has been known for a long time.
Well that's a real shocker.
Isn't it only a "turn" the first time?
This is like the 30th time.
As it becomes more and more clear that the SCOTUS will be hearing 2020 Election cases, I hope this decision eases some fears about ACB being "compromised," "easily bullied," or whatever other stupid shit many of you have been saying.
If you all actually believe GEOTUS is a 4D chess master (he is) who had the foresight to know a couple years ago that this was how the election was going to play out (seems likely, considering his 2018 post-election actions), I would hazard to guess that his pre-nomination interview with ACB probably covered this very topic.
A lot of people here get all nervous about Gorsuch and Kavanaugh unnecessarily, also. I think they have each sided with Democrats on a case or two. People forget - the court is not a "left or right" body (though it is framed that way by most everybody), but a "constitutional or not" body. If they can justify their opinions in that context I have no issue with any justice "siding against" their party.
Roberts is a compromised pedophile
I agree he’s a scum bag, but there is a bright point with roberts voting with the other side. If he votes with the majority he is the ranking member and get to write a wishy washy majority opinion. With him not voting with them I believe justice Thomas is ranking member and can right the opinion like it should be. Just my two cents
Again roberts is a scum bag
Obama got dirt on him
This is part of their plan.... SCOTUS gives Trump the win. MSM screams it's all because of ACB and that "even republican Roberts is against it." And they will riot
Also covid will magically get worse
Chief Justice Roberts votes with his liberal block.
every now and then a glimmer of sanity in our world
Color me surprised.
He is a liberal judge he doesn't join them He was always with them Bush appointed him
He's not a turncoat, he's always been a statist bitch, especially when his name came up in Epsteinps flight logs,
Roberts ( among many others) was compromised by the HMR surveillance system. They fear President Trump because they don’t have ANYTHING on him.. zero,nada,zilch.
He is owned by Bush isnt he? Bush isnt an idiot he would have got got someone he had dirt on.
Roberts is a known compromised actor
John Roberts adopted the illegal irish kid he was having sex with.
That will make you vote for whatever they tell you.
We knew he would.
Kim Clement prophecised Trump, 2 terms, and 2 justices having to step down in shame.
My money is on Robert’s being one of them.
Nothing new there, he sided against churches in Nevada too. Just gets overruled now with ACB on the Court!
Roberts is getting impeached in the near future. That’s probably why Trump kept saying he’d get one or two more picks in a second term. Senate better do their job and get rid of this RINO cuck John Roberts.
John Roberts? Wasn't he on the Lolita Express logs?
"Jesus is a man, he had a beard!"
I really can't bring myself to care about Roberts anymore.
He's been neutered.
Redemption for a small group of liberal scum? Or a temporary right act. Most likely the latter
What ever they have on him has to be good. Life in prison for fucking some 13 year old to death?
Reminder; Roberts is on the Epstein flight logs.
I am betting HE IS the John Roberts on Epstein's Flight Logs. If true and we can prove it, he can be removed.
He's compromised, someone probably took pictures when he was on one of his Lolita Express trips.
That disgusts me. How could a SCOTUS ever vote against freedom to practice religion.
I would much rather have freedom over security! Let me concern for my security, I don’t need a government entity to do it for me.
Should just say "justice keagan joins the the 3 liberal justices".
We all know that Roberts is compromised.
That's what happens when you fly Air Epstein
Impeach the fucker OR find out what they've got on him and use it ourselves.
He's a snake, another gift from George W. Bush
What do you expect from a guy who frequented Epsteins pedo island