They have to goods on Roberts. This is how the deep state works. Install a candidate, pay a little visit to remind them who is the puppet master. A lifetime of having your stings pulled by the the deep state, what a miserable existence. Selling your soul to the devil to get to the top, no thank you.
The 4 dissenters do not belong on the bench. This should have been 9-0. What part of the first amendment prohibiting an infringement in religious worship isn’t clear to them? There is no pandemic exception
“Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging...the right of the people to peacefully assemble” - 1st amendment.
That is crystal clear. Literally could not be any clearer. How can anyone possibly believe a law limiting or forbidding church services complies with the 1st amendment? There is not even an argument to be made. It CLEARLY is unconstitutional and yet 4 Supreme Court justices ruled it is constitutional. Wtf if you think that is constitutional then you think nothing is unconstitutional.
Roberts is a RINO. Republican in name only.
He isn't a real republican, he votes in favor of democrat on everything.
Honesty if it wasn't for Amy getting in, trump would have likely lost this election due to Roberts.
They have to goods on Roberts. This is how the deep state works. Install a candidate, pay a little visit to remind them who is the puppet master. A lifetime of having your stings pulled by the the deep state, what a miserable existence. Selling your soul to the devil to get to the top, no thank you.
The 4 dissenters do not belong on the bench. This should have been 9-0. What part of the first amendment prohibiting an infringement in religious worship isn’t clear to them? There is no pandemic exception
“Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging...the right of the people to peacefully assemble” - 1st amendment.
That is crystal clear. Literally could not be any clearer. How can anyone possibly believe a law limiting or forbidding church services complies with the 1st amendment? There is not even an argument to be made. It CLEARLY is unconstitutional and yet 4 Supreme Court justices ruled it is constitutional. Wtf if you think that is constitutional then you think nothing is unconstitutional.
Roberts is a joke. Admits rule unduly restrictive but then rules it is ok