Dear pedes, I have been listening to pedes criticizing the use of closed source counting machines (TD.win, VIP) as well as the poll watcher from Delaware, PA mentioning huge distrust in USB sticks, the counting machines. Excuse me for focusing on just one suggestion posted by TD.win users, but do you think that making those machines more transparent would fix the voter fraud issue? I agree that adding transparency to those layers would improve the tracing of said issue. Though I have grown my vision of those voting machines that I would like to share:
- voting machines are a deep-state technocracy that is easily rampant
- giving Senators and county representatives the burden to learn software programming as means of verification???
- exploitability of software/hardware in ways not humanly reiterable
I want to make one point very clear: the society is growing at large and we must have hardware as vote-counting support in combination with paper ballots if all hell breaks loose!
I like that you mention the CCVT. You want to digitally preserve the election of presidents for future generations in an easily verifiable way. Good idea! Point about cost. I totally like your first two points. The crux about your third point is the selection of professionals. Witness testimony has implied that independent poll watchers turned out to be left-leaning. If you don't mind could you clearify your third point to me?
Basically 3 separate groups that do not communicate to each other.
This way if there is one Rouge group.. the counts from the other two will flag it.
Then back to the CCTV..we can have the batches documented and look directly at the ballots to verify via recording. I installed some cameras on a RCCL ship that could zoom in to read the year on a quarter from 50 feet away.