Thanks for posting .
Reading the dissents is informative.
Roberts and the other communist rat bastards all maintained that because Cuomo, AFTER the complaint was filed, changed the classification from orange to yellow, the situation changed and it was therefore moot. This sophistry would allow the governor to perpetually impose restrictions, force the churches to expend time and money to file for injunctive relief, then pull the restrictions right before the court hears the case, and have the court engage in a continual round robin of declaring the issue moot, while allowing the governor the ability to continue the unconstitutional practice at any time he chooses.
This has become their MO, time after time. Continually implement unconstitutional laws and change them when a challenge moves forward. Repeat ad nauseum. Fuck Commie lawfare.
The SCOTUS has done this with gun restrictions as well. Government lets the unconstitutional law ride until it gets to the SCOTUS and then changes it and declares the case moot. However SCOTUS can hear those cases if it wanted to because a controversy remains intact if the government is likely to do the same thing again and we all know they will
Well, I do like the principle, in principle, of the SC ruling on as little as possible, only what's absolutely necessarily before them, so as to not set national precedent unnecessarily.
Thanks for posting .
Reading the dissents is informative.
Roberts and the other communist rat bastards all maintained that because Cuomo, AFTER the complaint was filed, changed the classification from orange to yellow, the situation changed and it was therefore moot. This sophistry would allow the governor to perpetually impose restrictions, force the churches to expend time and money to file for injunctive relief, then pull the restrictions right before the court hears the case, and have the court engage in a continual round robin of declaring the issue moot, while allowing the governor the ability to continue the unconstitutional practice at any time he chooses.
very sneaky. but that's how they do, right?
we all know those little shits that get away with stuff on technicalities? they're attempting to take over the country.
This has become their MO, time after time. Continually implement unconstitutional laws and change them when a challenge moves forward. Repeat ad nauseum. Fuck Commie lawfare.
The SCOTUS has done this with gun restrictions as well. Government lets the unconstitutional law ride until it gets to the SCOTUS and then changes it and declares the case moot. However SCOTUS can hear those cases if it wanted to because a controversy remains intact if the government is likely to do the same thing again and we all know they will
Hopefully now that we have a real 5-4 majority they will hear some of those cases and right the wrongs!
Well, I do like the principle, in principle, of the SC ruling on as little as possible, only what's absolutely necessarily before them, so as to not set national precedent unnecessarily.