Literally every lawsuit I have ever read the briefings for had typos in it.
Because it's a long ass document and the court really doesn't give a shit about typos (within reason of course, changing entire words and meanings with typos is a nono). They care about evidence and which section of the law you are bringing your claim under.
What actually happens with these typos? non-law pede here* Does the just go "do you have the fixed document with the changes diffed(i'm a software engineer, diffing changes is a constant process for us) but we recognize this first one is huge and you did it in record time so it still is 'entered' then with the change stamped now?
Literally every lawsuit I have ever read the briefings for had typos in it. Because it's a long ass document and the court really doesn't give a shit about typos (within reason of course, changing entire words and meanings with typos is a nono). They care about evidence and which section of the law you are bringing your claim under.
What actually happens with these typos? non-law pede here* Does the just go "do you have the fixed document with the changes diffed(i'm a software engineer, diffing changes is a constant process for us) but we recognize this first one is huge and you did it in record time so it still is 'entered' then with the change stamped now?
It could just be an issue with the OCR they used on this, I’m thinking it’s that since there is also a ‘rn’ where an ‘m’ fits
That's what I'm thinking too. I've used Adobe text recognition with similar results many times in the past. Super annoying.