Take the time to read it all yourself. I know it seems like a lot to ask, but do it anyway. When you talk about this with normie friends and family and they poo-poo the scale of the steal, ask them if they have read the lawsuit in it's entirety. Of course they haven't, but you have. You can speak with authority on the preponderance of evidence. Chide them even, if they are so sure that massive voter/election fraud didn't occur, why are they afraid to read it for themselves? Or are they just lazy? What if like you they are persuaded by the overwhelming evidence it presents? Do they fear what that would mean for their world view?
Comments (87)
sorted by:
It won't help with arguments. Libs don't give a shit about reality, but they will vehemently argue what they believe to be true (i.e. - what they are told to believe by whatever shit news source they use). I had a very short discussion with a lib about the transcripts of the phone calls to Ukraine when peach mints was the big lib talk of the day. I asked him if he actually read the transcripts himself. OF COURSE he did! So I started asking him about specific points and he said that things were redacted and there were ellipses indicating that sections were missing. I told him he can get the full transcript, but the truth is that he never read any transcripts and was full of shit. At that point, the discussion always devolves into straw men and ad hominem.
That was just a few pages. Imagine some lib reading or even skimming through 104 pages of reality. It's a good idea to know what's there, but I doubt it will help you set any records straight.