35
Comments (14)
sorted by:
3
truthforchange [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

Pedes,

Right now we are at a "no guarantees" 5-4 majority in the SCOTUS. We should be at 6-3, but something has been wrong with Roberts for awhile now as we all know (between his views at confirmation and his recent decisions).

There is NO GUARANTEE that one of those 5 other judges aren't in the same position as Roberts may be, and will wind up screwing us, screwing POTUS, when it matters most. 5-4 is too close. One judges unexpected decision and it all goes the other way.

What's the solution?

Figure out what may have happened to Roberts, when, and by whom. I think some of this can be done by going over his decision history to see when he started siding against conservative judges?

IF (if if If) there is something that is preventing Roberts from freely making his own decisions, then he should resign.

If he resigns, then we are at a more comfortable 5-3.

2
GenericConservative 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was just thinking this could be done. Find out what he’s hiding, then out him.

If anyone can do it, this website has proven it can.

YES, we all know about the flight log and his adopted kids. Dig deeper and prove either is true or not and maybe we’ll get somewhere.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
truthforchange [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is there evidence of this? Or just the "John Roberts" in Epstein's flight log? If you believe that is JUSTICE John Roberts in the flight log, then the flight logs should provide dates.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
truthforchange [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Pictures of what? The name "John Roberts" in the logs? Or pictures of Justice Roberts?

FWIW, "Roberts" is about the most 50th common surname in USA. "John"... for that period of time... cmon man. That's gotta be like #1.

0
truthforchange [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just in terms of how common the name is within small circles, there is also a "John Roberts" at FOX... @JohnRobertsFOX

2
everydaybetter 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is a reliable Wall Street Republican, which is the Democrat position now. He is reliable votes for corporations.

0
truthforchange [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

As a Bush appointee, that makes sense.

2
AtariArtist 2 points ago +2 / -0

A flight to a certain island with more kids than lord of the flies springs to mind.

Wonder what happened to all that video and CD evidence that was scoured from both the island and the house of 1000 cameras?

1
ANOMIC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Obama care ruling. “Elections have consequences”

1
truthforchange [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes, that one of course one of the most notable revealing decisions.... but was there something earlier? When did he first start voting against his expected or usual style?

1
AKGriz 1 point ago +1 / -0

He had a seizure or two or three, as well. I don't remember all the details, but I remember being very concerned at the time. Residual effects of "dain bramage?"