True, but a trickier argument given that it's already well established that governments can restrict the size of crowds in a given location for "public safety" such as fire marshall codes.
How is this for objective reality. We all collectively grow some balls. When the cop knocks on the door. Homeowner answers. "I would like to surrender myself peacefully if you will allow my family to enjoy their holiday together" cops-"no, youre all under arrest". Opens door to view of ten family kembers aiming directly at the officers stating "we will not comply". Would it be reality then?
The right to peaceably assemble. The whole thing is upheld, or the ruling is worthless. Ask SCOTUS.
True, but a trickier argument given that it's already well established that governments can restrict the size of crowds in a given location for "public safety" such as fire marshall codes.
Private property does not a constitutionally protected space make unless said property owner allows it.
There's philosophical truth, and there's the objective reality of the situation in which we currently find ourselves.
How is this for objective reality. We all collectively grow some balls. When the cop knocks on the door. Homeowner answers. "I would like to surrender myself peacefully if you will allow my family to enjoy their holiday together" cops-"no, youre all under arrest". Opens door to view of ten family kembers aiming directly at the officers stating "we will not comply". Would it be reality then?