7235
Comments (324)
sorted by:
450
EyesInTheHills [S] 450 points ago +452 / -2

Detroit Precincts Are NO LONGER REPORTING PUBLICLY! These numbers will only get worse as more information becomes available.

202
Ithrowawaay 202 points ago +203 / -1

Sounds about right.

-a former resident of Wayne county.

89
Shitposter69 89 points ago +93 / -4

Hey, at least you guys have the Lions. Oh wait...

At least you have the Tigers... no that's not it...

The red wings?

Why do people live in Wayne county again?

74
Ithrowawaay 74 points ago +76 / -2

Wings held the city together for years, and by that I mean drove suburbanites downtown to spend money.

Now...not so much.

21
GlacialSpeed 21 points ago +21 / -0

Detroit is a failed city black hole that is pulling Michigan into the status of Failed State

19
Ithrowawaay 19 points ago +19 / -0

Through fraud, if you haven’t noticed.

It’s all bullshit.

Take that out and Detroit will actually have a Renaissance.

15
PeteButtplug 15 points ago +15 / -0

It really puts into perspective the fact that dems want America to die.

17
Ithrowawaay 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yup. They’d rather rule over the ashes than see the greatest nation succeed.

These people are sick.

6
comooragh 6 points ago +6 / -0

I laughed when I saw the dems want to give "free farmland" to blacks in the cities. Sounds like an excuse to scatter ten million black urbanites to rural 1 person per square mile areas in the middle of nowhere, then resettle the ghettoes with hipsters.

IF- and that's a big IF- Biden gets into office, we're gonna see a hell of a ride to hell.

8
Horseradish 8 points ago +8 / -0

Sounds like a Great Leap Forward.

I'm sure it will work out fine.

2
Tbaron 2 points ago +2 / -0

In the past...after the Civil War...they also promised the freedom slaves 40 acres and a mule.

I don't think most city dwelling Black folk want to go back to scratching a living off a small piece of land.

2
daty_dato 2 points ago +2 / -0

So they'll become farmers? How did that work in South Africa.?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Lila_Quartermaine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Really? Like 40 acres and a mule?

11
Shitposter69 11 points ago +13 / -2

It's too bad they had to start sucking so bad right when they went to the new stadium. They couldn't even get that thing half full!

11
Ithrowawaay 11 points ago +11 / -0

Illitch’s thought they could demand that kinda coin for their shiny new venue.

Joe Louis Arena was the spirit of Detroit.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Ithrowawaay 4 points ago +4 / -0

All part of it! Head down the aisles, like they did at Olympia.

1
NomadicKrow 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wanna know something weird? Ilitch's son, Atanas, was briefly an actor and singer. He starred in Slumber Party Massacre II and even had a musical number that he wrote and sang for the movie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwYMgLoENH8

That's insane to me. The son of the guy that founded Little Ceasar's Pizza was a slasher movie bad guy.

11
Strike_Eagle784 11 points ago +11 / -0

Detroit style Pizza...maybe?

12
AndrewLB 12 points ago +12 / -0

You mean the casserole? oh wait that's Chicago Pizza.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
MakeAmericaLegendary 4 points ago +5 / -1

That’s a funny way to spell best pizza.

3
Strike_Eagle784 3 points ago +4 / -1

xD I take it you're from New York as well?

4
Deadpool 4 points ago +4 / -0

People that lived in the Philly area use that term also 👌

2
Strike_Eagle784 2 points ago +2 / -0

Close enough to New York, makes sense lol.

5
pepperconchobhar 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, we've got the Silverdome.

Wait...

Well, they are tearing the abandoned buildings down faster now and there's less lead in the soil than expected?

8
Shitposter69 8 points ago +8 / -0

I figured it out. It's the roads! They're great right? Stretchen said we're fixing them!

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stretchan lolz

1
GhengisDon 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean the potholes with crumbling asphalt between them?

1
pepperconchobhar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah. The roads.

Now that was funny.

4
TheFop1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because they love the tropical weather and rolling hills.

4
wendysspicynuggets 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cant sell their worthless property, stuck. Although those who rent idk why

2
Kweebecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those who own are at an advantage to those who rent. They either sell the property at a loss, or they declare bankruptcy. Either way, they're just as free to move as the renters.

It is being comfortable where you are, even if where you are objectively sucks, that is the problem, not mobility.

6
SoldierofKek 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is wayne county just Detroit or are there near suburbs that also get held prisoner by Detroit?

6
Ithrowawaay 6 points ago +6 / -0

Suburbs too. Over a million plus live in Wayne county, outside of Detroit.

6
Hairy_Mouse 6 points ago +6 / -0

Detroit is the main city. With a city that large, there are sure to be other decently sized cities and suburbs bordering it, and a few more rural areas as well. Counties are pretty large. So is Detroit, but it's not COUNTY sized.

Like, I don't live far from Pittsburgh PA. It's in Allegheny county, and the city has a lot of people, but outside that there is still forests and stuff where people live in the same county, as well as smaller cities and towns.

Of course, when you live in a county with a massive city, your politics are pretty much dictated by that city if you live in a more rural area. You're pretty much just along for the ride.

2
MegaMAGAMichiPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

I concur.

-a current resident of Wayne county.

44
boredrandomguy 44 points ago +44 / -0

It's easy to fake a Detroit address when there are so many abandoned/condemned houses and other buildings in the city.

9
beev_bove_biv 9 points ago +9 / -0

Wait they can do that?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
redinmn 7 points ago +7 / -0

I dont think any of them are MN. I think that got straightened out. Someone mistook MI and MN. They were listing Detroit Lakes, Frazee, and others that were all in lakes country where a lot of MSP millionaires have lake homes. I assume some shenanigans there also with double voting.

1
HueyLongAdmirer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't Grand Rapids also in lakes country? That's where Gerald Ford was from, right? ;)

Wait.....I thought Grand Rapids, Michigan had the big paper mill? Judy Garland is from there?

2
abnormalend 2 points ago +2 / -0

Grand Rapids, MI is in Kent County. Known for the furniture industry historically. Steelcase is from here, Herman Miller is not far either.

Ford is from MI, Garland is from MN.

1
droden 1 point ago +1 / -0

womp x 36812

182
hughesdude2 182 points ago +184 / -2

Gotta love how the leftists were screaming about how stupid the typos were, when in reality it just showed that Minnesota is ALSO fraudulent. LOL

40
SirSeizureSalad 40 points ago +42 / -2

How's that? I saw the typo, but how's it show Minnesota?

83
A_Discord_Moderator 83 points ago +84 / -1

The original version of the affidavit had the stats for Minnesota precincts, so they corrected it and replaced all the stats with actual Michigan precincts. What's funny is, even the stats from Minnesota were just as bad as Michigan's, showing that it's fraud-riddled there as well.

43
PM_ME_UR_MAGIC_CARDS 43 points ago +44 / -1

That doesn't surprise me in the least... you mean to tell me Trump lost to Clinton by 0.5% but lost to Biden by over 2? Okay.

20
MakeAmericaLegendary 20 points ago +20 / -0

Guarantee we won MN as well.

6
AndrewCuomosEmmy 6 points ago +6 / -0

You mean Massachusetts? Pretty sure MS is Mississippi.

6
MakeAmericaLegendary 6 points ago +6 / -0

Meant MN. Too many M states.

4
AndrewCuomosEmmy 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you combine all the states that start with M, you get 70 Electoral Votes across 8 states using the current map.

1
LongKnifeKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can’t recall who it is but some comedians got a bit about the bloke that had to come up with the abbreviations for states, it’s a good watch for a laugh.

Alabama - AL simple Arkansas - AR easy, no problem Alaska - Fuck!

11
Kek_The_World 11 points ago +11 / -0

They were churning these out so fast they probably made one as a template and then used it for other state and didn’t make the switch.

It’s still sloppy but way better then I could do so I’m not going to arm chair quarterback. I’ve given up football anyway

4
PierreDerelicto 4 points ago +4 / -0

A postscript: has Mr. Ramsland inadvertently stumbled across evidence of voter fraud in Minnesota? I seriously doubt it. The venues in question are all in red Greater Minnesota, not in the blue urban areas where voter fraud is common.

Suddenly we're back in the old ARPANET days and it takes observers being forced out to compromise the machines. Also he forgot the red 2016 Anterim county. Just a poison pill from the powerlineblog article

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
20
Skogin 20 points ago +20 / -0

Someone said affidavit from wrong state was included. More than a typo, technically. But any of these errors may have been intentional to get the message out by baiting people into criticizing the errors.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
13
GoldwaterVoter 13 points ago +13 / -0

Anybody else notice that there are TWO paragraphs numbered '13' ???

This is clear and irrefutable evidence of ... just how fast all these amazing legal teams were working to SAVE OUR REPUBLIC!!!

92
nasty_pelosi 92 points ago +99 / -7

The 781% turnout figure is misleading. That is percentage turnout when normalized to 80%. Not sure why they chose to do that.

The part about more ballots counted than counting capacity is huge. I wish they included a breakdown of the counties, machine types, and number of machines. Maybe that will be revealed later?

Edit: from further analysis downthread, this figure appears to be completely inaccurate:

https://thedonald.win/p/11QS7j8aGI/x/c/4DpL5WZ58UB

56
Pilotmtb 56 points ago +57 / -1

So if they went off of 100% it would have been like 650% voter turnout or something like that? Still really really bad

68
KekistaniMemeLord 68 points ago +68 / -0

80-100+% is bad, 650% is absolutely comical levels of fraud. Comical because all you can do is laugh to keep yourself from going full judge dredd on every single poll worker/ democrat in the state.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
PhilippElhaus 6 points ago +6 / -0

They made the lie big on purpose, known tactic.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
40
wendysspicynuggets 40 points ago +40 / -0

Probably because 80% is the highest historical normal and they are showing us it is 781% higher than the historical normal

7
Andy2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

Our historical voting participation rate is in the 60s range. In the 2020 election, I think there were 100 million eligible voters who did not vote.

2
FirstFlamingo 2 points ago +3 / -1

If 80% is 781% higher than the historical normal that would mean the historical normal is just barely over 10% wouldn't it?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
FirstFlamingo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah weird, I must have read the comment differently originally because upon re-reading that makes way more sense

21
LessSwampMoreMAGA 21 points ago +22 / -1

I would argue it’s not misleading at all. It doesmy matter if it’s 781.654% or 410.342%, the concept is still the same. There’s fraud.

Trump does this a lot with his tweets, cite an incorrect number that the left argues the actual number is X but still completely proves his point.

The left/swamp does the opposite. They change the whole concept of the argument while keeping technically correct numbers but hide behind “but the number is taken out of context”

Anyone who argues that numbers don’t lie either doesn’t understand or is intentionally misleading that numbers are only simplification of observations so our minds can have a reference point.

5
Minarchist_Manlet 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
1
Observation 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interestingly, 78.1% (moving the decimal in 781%) is almost exactly the percent of turnout in N. Muskegon. (Again, 2,648 voters out of 3,390 registered.)

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
18
DonJr2024 18 points ago +18 / -0

I get so confused trying to follow all this stuff.

I wish they would say "this county has 5000 population and 3500 registered voters and the vote total was 3501". Like that alone would just invalidate the whole county.

3
DCPower 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah I agree, I like seeing the raw data, it’s really easy to explain to normies that way.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
1
DCPower 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really? Link it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
-1
DCPower -1 points ago +1 / -2

Well it’s quite simple, they changed the report to cover their tracks and while it doesn’t prove anything, it’s odd to see a major typo in a computer generated report in the brief time I looked at it. Notice that the report is dated 11/13/2020, 10 days after the election, rather odd don’t you think? I’d have to cross check to see if the numbers they’re reporting now are the same as what they reported earlier. Also in the report there seemed to be precincts out of order and some seemed to be outright missing near the end. Almost like it was hastily thrown together and not the proper report.

Don’t forget, the left deals in lies and subterfuge. Just like Google conveniently made thedonald on Reddit unsearchable, they reversed it later once we started talking about it and made us look foolish when we said “try for yourself” and the normie could search it just fine.

I do find it odd that these government sites aren’t ending in .gov, quite frankly the whole thing looks sketchy, but I was able to arrive to the reports eventually from Michigan’s official website, still odd, but doesn’t prove anything.

Long story short, I’d trust someone willing to sign an affidavit since that comes with the consequence of 5 years jail time and you better believe that if the left ever managed to get power that they’d use that as an excuse to throw them in jail and take all their possessions.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
13
chase_now 13 points ago +14 / -1

Edit: I read the section and want to change my answer as my previous one was based on just reading the comments above.

It sounds like the point being made is they found a lot of places (643 precincts) with over 80% turnout. 80% is already a fraud indicator for most places. They don't have all the data since it is being repressed so they normalized based on what they do have and counting excess votes over 80% turnout and found a minimum 36,812 fraudulent votes.

Here is the text you can read it yourself 11. Another statistical red flag can be observed in Michigan where even the very limited remaining public data reveals 643 precincts with voter turn-out above 80%, according to county records. Further if these very limited remaining public data votes were normalized to 80% turnout (still 15%+/- above normal), the excess votes are at least 36,812 over the maximum that could be expected.

----------‐‐‐------------- Here is my Previous answer that may be correct still but I dont know how they normalized the data. And it was not thr main point that was trying to be made in the document.

They based the 781% off of 80% instead of 100%. Normalizing just puts numbers into a perspective. I think they did that because 80% turnout is already a suspicious number that people could go to court to dispute because most record breaking turnout hits barely into the 70%s.

So the 781% is basically showing almost 8 times the amount of votes above what an already suspicious fraud line would be.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Observation 2 points ago +2 / -0

According to the official state data, there were 0.779 times as many votes compared to registered voters.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
3
the_pragmaticist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Adjusted for defined factors.

3
JMaN 3 points ago +3 / -0

It means these numbers ain't normal! This sheeit is rigged!

3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ya think so?

;>

64
Suitwo 64 points ago +64 / -0

Over three years of phony Russia investigations and the Democrats and media don't want to talk about these phony results for even three weeks while there is still NO OFFICIAL WINNER! yet they claim it's over. Tells you how much they care about integrity, it only matters if it is a result they don't like.

15
Thep1mp 15 points ago +15 / -0

Not to mention how they screamed that Trump stole the last election. If they feel the election was legit this time they shouldn’t care if any audits happen.

9
Grady_Wilson 9 points ago +9 / -0

I asked some cuck to show me the lawsuits and challenges with hundreds of pages of affidavits that were filed against the Trump win in 2016 when he said this election wasn't stolen but 2016 was.

1
worbler 1 point ago +1 / -0

He didn't even bother to bring up the ENTIRE MUELLER PROBE?

1
Grady_Wilson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope.

Even the Commies know the Mueller probe was complete BS.

6
Karma_Bus_Route_20 6 points ago +6 / -0

If they honestly think there was no fraud, they should love an audit. It would give them an opportunity to be smug and make Trump look bad. They're not doing this because they know they cheated and got caught.

3
PlebbitorDestroyer 3 points ago +3 / -0

“NOOO please don’t check my work, I arrived at the right answer! Every step was followed! Don’t check!”

1
wethepepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Should be embracing them!

You want to “come together and heal”? Then they should be damn determined to guarantee confidence in the election results being legit.

Instead, they’re trying to hastily sweep it under the rug. Why???? (We know why)

10
nasty_pelosi 10 points ago +10 / -0

The mainstream media (both traditional and social) are disseminating propaganda at an unprecedented level.

It's glaringly obvious when they are all broadcasting the same message in unison.

Actual journalists would normally have incentive to compete and get exclusive stories before the other guys.

Stories that all come out at the same time and project the same message are a dead giveaway of a coordinated propaganda operation.

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need someone like in They Live breaking into all the news channel broadcasts to tell the people the truth.

Or hand out magic sunglasses or something.

4
PlebbitorDestroyer 4 points ago +4 / -0

TheDonald.win, Bitchute, and Parler will have to suffice for now.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
magaspif 5 points ago +5 / -0

they can claim whatever they want - everyone else is going to watch this fucker burn

5
MakeAmericaLegendary 5 points ago +5 / -0

Every conservative’s go-to in 2021-onward should be “I don’t care.” Don’t give people who think it was stolen the time of day anymore, because we’ve seen that it’s irrelevant and everyone knows the truth.

61
Anti_Immigration 61 points ago +61 / -0

"We'll fix it later"

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
11
Ithrowawaay 11 points ago +11 / -0

We’ll do the damn thing live!

8
MemeWarsVet 8 points ago +8 / -0

STOP THE HAMMERING!

2
GoldwaterVoter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope you are talking about the public executions.

54
Dang 54 points ago +54 / -0

Whats the penalty for all those that took part in and for all those complacent in election fraud?

35
Smubbs 35 points ago +35 / -0

Death

20
Dang 20 points ago +20 / -0

Yes

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
14
magaspif 14 points ago +14 / -0

For the leaders? Death For the underlings? Felony - never vote again, never be involved in voting or politics again, massive penalty (debt for the rest of your life), lose job, a tattoo on your head that says "traitor", prison time, public humiliation. for starters

12
Vulkanian 12 points ago +12 / -0

The Brazen Bull.

11
MemeWarsVet 11 points ago +11 / -0

Oh, I like you!

How about Scaphism on the shores of Lake Michigan?

2
abnormalend 2 points ago +2 / -0

On one hand, that would really send a message about election fraud. On the other hand though, that's our water supply.

1
Kweebecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe a Flint river?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
Grond999 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Death" = nothing unfortunately

40
Qualityproduct 40 points ago +40 / -0

Guys, just got in "argument" ( I was just calm asking questions) over how fraud couldn't have happened because 1000s of people would of had to have been in on it. My only argument for the sake of securing my power level, was how that argument is a copout. I just went through 30 minutes of ridicule from my family because I didn't believe that to be a logical argument as to why it couldn't have taken place.

Be strong Pedes. Stay calm. Don't waver. Don't shy away. Don't ridicule your family, even when they do.

31
A_Discord_Moderator 31 points ago +31 / -0

They simply don't understand that what happened here can be done with an extraordinarily small amount of people. In fact, many of the affidavits/complaints point out that most of the cases of vote-flipping and purposeful vote selection, disqualification, etc. are done by sometimes 1 to 2 people. The systems we use to count the votes are so vulnerable and insecure all it takes is a couple people to be corrupt.

12
EyesInTheHills [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

This. The hearing yesterday demonstrated very clearly that it only takes one or two people to impact tens of thousands of votes. I'll have to pull that testimony out and post it, so we can put that argument to bed.

Testimony- https://streamable.com/u29dre

Source- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSDZkXxFVEU&t=1h6m53s

10
magaspif 10 points ago +10 / -0

and dont forget the useful idiots in the big blue cities they bribed ($650) that were responsible for the physical ballot stuffing. no doubt most did this jubilantly.

11
A_Discord_Moderator 11 points ago +11 / -0

These useful-idiot democrats don't even need to be bribed to do the sketchy shit they did. There are hundreds of affidavits stating that poll watchers etc. were bullied, treated unequal, forced far away from actually seeing votes as they're counted, harassment, threats, the list goes on.

The leftist media creates zealot leftists that will go out of their way to "win", bribe not required.

5
magaspif 5 points ago +5 / -0

the money adds an additional trail

4
nasty_pelosi 4 points ago +4 / -0

Of course they did, and they did it at all levels. If you had a chance to defeat "literally Hitler", wouldn't you?

2
Tejas_Pepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are hundreds of affidavits stating that poll watchers etc. were bullied, treated unequal, forced far away from actually seeing votes as they're counted, harassment, threats, the list goes on.

exactly, especially in these black districts. They have been convinced that all on the Right are racists.

1
TheTrooper424 1 point ago +1 / -0

Riggers gonna rig.

2
TheTrooper424 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those dumb riggers would, with a smile on their face, sell their kids for a few benjamins. They don't care about anything but themselves.

2
Minarchist_Manlet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then they just quote Krebs who the media parroted, "the most secure election in history!"

15
wizzingonwallstreet 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yeah, there were a bunch of people who weren't connected. Just doing what they could from their position because orange man bad. There was connected fraud, like the states shutting down at the same time. But there was a lot of little frauds, like voting 3 times, or getting 50 votes from some mental hospital, some blue hair running the same ballots through 50 times.. A bunch of those little ones added up. Then when you collectively look at all of it combined, you get these unrealistic numbers, like 80,000,000 for biden.

There was too much unconnected fraud which exposed all of it connected and unconnected.

Plus all they do is the same as the riots. Call this number we'll get you free, then pay them to go do it.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
8
Qualityproduct 8 points ago +8 / -0

I have to pick my points wisely cause unfortunately I wish to keep their "support" as family, so as I said... Have to conceal my power level. My argument was basic. "1000s of people would have to be involved and keep it secret" is not a valid argument to why it couldn't have happened. Real basic. Doesn't show what side I'm on, just that it was a faulty argument on their part. The backlash was so intense that clearly, mentioning veritas would lead to explosions. I did however show one of them the video of the usps working explaining how he didn't recant. They believed he did recant. They even told me I was crazy for thinking this guy had 3 hours of an fbi interrogation , that the fbi would have patted him down for wires... The delusion is strong amongst those who are grasping for reality . It became sad, and my empathy kicked in, which is bullshit because I did nothing wrong, But FUCk... They are worried

7
RandallRaines 7 points ago +7 / -0

Their basic argument doesn't even make sense, "Can't happen because thousands would have to be involved and that many people can't keep a secret." Well they didn't keep it a secret, in fact they were caught, thousands of times. Or are they now asserting that thousands of people couldn't conspire to cheat, but thousands of people could conspire to pretend they did? You already pointed out the veritas stuff, where they didn't have to trick anyone to find election fraud, the criminals were openly posting what they were doing to social media.

Basically, you won't win because this is emotional for them. Evidence causes them mental anguish, and makes them upset with you for causing them this pain. The only way out is for them to convince themselves, I haven't found a way to confront them about reality that ends well.

4
Qualityproduct 4 points ago +4 / -0

I know. It's rough. It was sad. I'm not in the business of convincing people of things, I learned long ago that's a pointless path... But I wanted them to at least see how their argument was not a real argument. I did mention the 1000s of affidavits, bit they kept saying how all of Trump's cases were thrown out. I responded with , " well I thought those were other people's suits in court" and that " honestly, I haven't been fond of guiliani since 2001". I was seriously trying to just ask why they thought their argument was valid when it's clearly not. I explained the video of Coomer showing how to change a vote with the software... And they went back to, " well, see... He would have had to have 1000s of people take part" I explained how that's a false logic as well. He showed how one person could. Then the argument shifted to the actually physical ballots and how of they faked numbers in the software, how come the physical added up. I said, well they said pa issued 1.4 million mail I'ma but received 2 million. They told me because that hearing wasn't a real court hearing that it's not valid evidence.

It really is too emotional for them.

I told them to buy futures in laughter, cause my God is it coming

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
Qualityproduct 6 points ago +6 / -0

My argument ended with

Family member - " oh, so you think our democracy is shit?"

Me - " always has been"

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Minarchist_Manlet 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was postal inspectors, not FBI.

I sincerely hope you can break free of their craziness soon. Even if they come to see the light, it's better for you to be independent and free to speak your mind. Let them come to you when they're ready.

1
Qualityproduct 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm broken free for sure. Own house and family and independent . I just don't wish to destroy my relationship

4
spez__ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Point to the complete secrecy regarding the Manhattan project.

1
Qualityproduct 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did.

3
aangler100 3 points ago +3 / -0

Over 100 million voters in America KNOW rigging happened AND changed the outcome of the elections.

So anyone arguing differently is lying or ignorant, believe me.

17
Nomoralcompass89 17 points ago +17 / -0

This is DISPOOTED! /s

16
BlastRadius 16 points ago +16 / -0

Woah.. dead peeps, cats and dogs can vote too, bigot!

5
aangler100 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ballots run through counters multiple times.

People voting multiplet times.

Hundreds of thousands of unidentified "mail-in" ballots, not requested, marked for only one candidate, etc.

Simply adding or subtracting to the total of votes when you submit the precinct count.

100s of Precincts had more votes then voters, more votes than ballots.

I'm not even counting, yet, votes added electronically in the machines. There are a hundred ways to cheat Democrats, &RINOs used them all, subtract all the different fraud votes you have a Trump Landslide.

This is Almost all ONLY in the 1-2 Largest Counties in Each State, it is NOT wide spread (maybe the electronic is) It does not need to be wide spread when you can add 500,000 votes in a single county. One county clerk can add 500,000 votes, one person.

13
The_banned 13 points ago +13 / -0

Traitors will be dealt with. I don't even feel like we are holding a line anymore, I'm casually walking foreward while whistling my favourite tune. They fucked up so bad. We fucked them up with our high energy, legendaty turnout to show support for GEOTUS and our country.

8
Thep1mp 8 points ago +8 / -0

We the people need to make sure the traitors are dealt with if anyone in government refuses to do so. In fact..... anyone who refuses to do so should get the same punishment because they are complicit in this bullshit. The time for games is over. Anyone who says violence isn’t an option is a moron. It isn’t our first option- we’ve already used up a bunch of options- but it definitely is an option. Let’s hope things are dealt with in the next month or so and we don’t have to use that option

11
AlcoholicRetard 11 points ago +11 / -0

Is this the one where they mixed up MN and MI? Did they fix it?

19
A_Discord_Moderator 19 points ago +19 / -0

Yes, and yes. The irony is, the MN stats they showed were also horrid and riddled with impossible numbers, and correcting it to MI now shows it absolutely effects more than 1 state lmao.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
AK94 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm confused. What are you concluding from this? That the affidavit is wrong, or that the numbers are impossible to make sense of?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
0
Rustbeltkulak 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hold on, the city of North Muskegon population is estimated at 3,793, not all of which are obviously of voting age or registered to vote. The total votes, if I am reading this right, is 3,770.

Am I mistaken in adding straight party to the totals for the race below? If so, the vote total is 2,633 out of an estimated population of 3,793 and that's a lot more believable and in contrast to the 781% claim.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
13
AlcoholicRetard 13 points ago +13 / -0

After the Project Veritas video with the Somali fraud that was pretty obvious.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
10
TehAgent 10 points ago +10 / -0

CNN: 691% of voters in Michigan suppressed and disenfranchised!

9
gamingthisandthat 9 points ago +9 / -0

When they start scrubbing the website ya know shits about to hit the fan

8
Diana 8 points ago +8 / -0

blank ballots can be entered into the system and treated as “writeins.” Then the operator can enter an allocation of the write-ins among candidates as he wishes. The final result then awards the winner based on “points” the algorithm in the compute, not actual votes. The fact that we observed raw vote data that includes decimal places suggests strongly that this was, in fact, done. Otherwise, votes would be solely represented as whole numbers.

3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

Right? We've known about it for weeks but to read weighted votes and decimals and points and algorithms instead of one person one vote again in black and white is just... like... ORLY???

2
Lovepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

I could make a better vote-cheating system myself! And I'm an amateur programmer.

7
BornFree1776 7 points ago +7 / -0

I love how alot of these affidavits are from like literally the most qualified people in the world. This guy only went to Harvard and Duke. And worked with NASA and MIT. I thought the left was the party of science? or was that just more propaganda, really turns out they are the party of lies and feelings. They even get degrees in feelings. We need to promote that we are the party of math and science and tech. Because we are.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
Postal 7 points ago +7 / -0

Either you throw it out or you do a full audit, of everything. Call in the national guard to handle the audit.

13
solomonwiebe 13 points ago +13 / -0

what good does an audit do when theyve refabricated trump ballots to biden ballots and shredded half the remaining trump ballots? nobody asks this question.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
PhilippElhaus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Default win for Trump and all congress races would be appropriate cause the vote is completely pozzzed and its impossible to figure the true count. Also the more time passes by the more Dem’s destroy/manipulate evidence etc.

6
TrumpsBestFriend 6 points ago +6 / -0

So the machines could only process about 100k ballots in these precincts in 2 hours and they reported over 350k votes? Lol.

Also there's no way that these Detroit precincts got anywhere near 80% turnout, let alone 100%. The amount of same-day registrations is insignificant. New Jersey sent out ballots to every voter and only got back 72% with comparable cities like Newark only getting 50-60% turnout.

Washington and Colorado have been doing mail-in elections for decades and they get turnouts in the 60s-70s% for their most engaged precincts in the suburbs.

6
ClarenceBeeks 6 points ago +6 / -0

Precinct/Township % Turnout City of North Muskegon 781.91% Zeeland Charter Township 460.51% Grout Township 215.21% City of Muskegon 205.07% City of Detroit 139.29% Spring Lake Township 120.00% Greenwood Township 100.00% Hart Township 100.00% Leavitt Township 100.00% Newfield Township 100.00% Otto Township 100.00% Pentwater Township 100.00% Shelby Township 100.00% Shelby Township 100.00% Weare Township 100.00% City of Hart 100.00% Grand Island Township 96.77% Tallmadge Charter Township 95.24% Fenton 93.33% Bohemia Twp 90.63%

6
Loplex 6 points ago +6 / -0

HAHAHAHA WHAT A HORRENDOUS MISTAKE THE DEMOCRATS COMMITED!

6
ShampocalypseWOW 6 points ago +7 / -1

MFW I keep learning the absolutely absurd ways the demo-traitors cheated in the election because they were THAT desperate to beat Orange Man...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qileP4bAzek

7
MakeAmericaLegendary 7 points ago +7 / -0

Imagine being the most popular President in American history and your opponents have to cheat like a third world country to still barely scrape by.

1
ShampocalypseWOW 1 point ago +2 / -1

That just makes destroying them all the more sweet.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
JetJocky 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anyone who continues to ignore evidence like that presented in the OP doesn't care if we become a banana republic. They only care about getting the results they want and imposing their will. The only question remaining is whether we will allow it to happen.

5
jackasskicker 5 points ago +5 / -0

The hammer keeps falling.

5
pepperconchobhar 5 points ago +5 / -0

People HERE are discrediting this guy and saying that this destroys Sidney's entire file.

It's getting irritating.

6
magaspif 6 points ago +6 / -0

remember there are a lot of people here who will always be luke warm. dont let it bother you, they will always be with us.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
pepperconchobhar 4 points ago +4 / -0

No. It was in another thread that started last night. As I went through it there was a guy bashing so hard that I had to check and see if it was a shill. Not a newby, but maybe a sleeper. (Not sure what to do with those.) In another thread somebody pointed out the same thing, but they weren't mean about it. Of course guy 2 could've read the crap from guy 1 and taken it to heart.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
pepperconchobhar 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is something my husband hashed out this morning.

I reminded him that he's a retired soldier and he knows damn well how important propaganda can be during a war. You can barely hold on from a military standpoint, but turn the entire war by demoralizing the enemy and sapping away their will to fight.

I've got hard, 2A, flag waving, Constitution-loving friends who saw Newsmax call Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Nevada for Biden yesterday that just melted. They're done. They went from, "WE WILL FIGHT!" to, "Well, I guess there's no point anymore. America's dead." I spent all morning dragging them back from the brink.

It's ridiculous how fragile some people's resolve really is.

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

Newsmax did what? Wow, they pulled a FOXnews pretty quick didn't they. Glad I landed on America's Voice three weeks ago with Newsmax only as a backup.

2
pepperconchobhar 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are a ton of articles in the MSM crowing about it. smh

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
thekindlyman555 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is a great affidavit that offers a lot of compelling evidence of potential tampering. My one issue is that listing of townships with high turnout seems to have several duplicates in it. The most worrying one is Zeeland Charter Township, which is listed twice with two different turnout numbers (460 and 90.6%)

This needs to be corrected.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
PaulRevere123 4 points ago +4 / -0

Holy fuck 781% turnout? What?

4
Jackdorsey 4 points ago +4 / -0

Soooo you have 1 million people in your city but 7 million voted? Geez even I can’t dispute that

3
KekBotSupreme 3 points ago +3 / -0

781% turnout

3
KeepMarxInTheGround 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did they really not expect anyone to look into this? 😆😆😆

3
DJT_MFer 3 points ago +3 / -0

The math in Bidenology works out!

3
jimboscott 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did he fix the issue with Minnesota locations being identified as from Michigan?

5
bobbydole 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah

4
magaspif 4 points ago +4 / -0

yes

3
Bigdeal 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why do they keep saying there is no evidence of fraud? The fraud was on another level, breaking election laws all over the place and helped all by the kungflu and yet it is completely ignored by MSM. Funny how the lower courts are throwing out cases based on racism and not on law. I guess those cases are getting reported on but not fairly. I can only hope when these case hit the highest courts the rule of law will win.

5
EyesInTheHills [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Follow the money. The Democratic Party, the MSM, and social media companies are tightly bound by personal and financial relationships. They are de facto the same political entity.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
EyesInTheHills [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anything above 80% voter turnout is normally considered an overvote. For enough people to register and vote on election day to raise the turnout above 80% is in and of itself, suspicious. To raise the turnout in over 640 precincts above 80% is circumstantial evidence of fraud.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Grade-AA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your Average Leftist Democrat with $100k of debt for their college "education":

https://i.ibb.co/m0MScNF/idiocracy-percents-781.jpg

3
wins_bigly 3 points ago +3 / -0

similar story in Clark Co, NV. Keep digging!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
AK94 1 point ago +1 / -0

If a voter in Precinct_A mails their ballot in, and it gets added to the tally for AVBC_1, then does it not get added to the Precint_A total, thus showing a lower turnout in Precint_A and contributing to the indeterminable ratio of AVBC_1? Why wouldn't all the ballots counted in AVBC_1 have the votes tallied in the respective precincts, so that the turnout ratios would make sense?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
2
AK94 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doesn't that seem like a scheme to allow for fraud? If Precint_A has 1000 registered voters, and 700 of them mail in their ballots, then turnout in _A cannot be greater than 30%. If among the remaining 300 half voted in person, then turnout would be 15%. Ergo, we would expect to see very low turnout in most precincts under the theory that most people mailed in their ballots. Meanwhile, in AVCB_1, ballots are mixed together from many precincts (see in the document you linked: "A jurisdiction that uses AV counting boards must establish an AV counting board for each precinct. (Jurisdictions of 250 or more precincts are exempt.)", so there are no numbers of registered voters available to constrain the maximum possible number of registered voters, so any number of votes can be counted in AVCB_1, whether real or fraudulent, and if there is no way to trace each ballot back to a legitimate registered voter, then there is no legitimacy to the vote counts at all.

Does that make sense to you?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
AK94 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here's another gem from that document:

"Determine the legality of the ballot by checking the signature on the absentee ballot return envelope against the voter’s absent voter ballot application and checking the ePollbook to confirm that the voter has not voted in person at the election (these steps are optional forAVCBs)."

1
AK94 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also:

"Cell Phones: Challengers and poll watchers may not be in possession of or have access to cell phones or other communication devices in an AVCB during the sequestration period. The enforcement of this policy is critical to the integrity of the election process."

So, what I glean from all of this, is that an AVCB is a black hole, where no one can record what is going on, and no one can validate the number of votes counted vs the number of legitimate registered voters (because large precincts can be combined), and where no duplicate votes or fraudulent signatures can be detected (because AVCB's are not required to do so).

Sounds like complete bullshit to me. Do you not agree?

2
AK94 2 points ago +2 / -0

And lastly, I note this glaring and bizarre piece of information:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EhUddpcDns&t=7m40s

At the bottom, it says: "Hold a few ballots back for late ballot processing". Can you or anyone explain what in the fuck would be the reason for doing that?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
TXMagaMom 2 points ago +2 / -0

C’mon man, get with the new math.

2
TheFountainhead 2 points ago +2 / -0

🐙

2
SkeletorsTeeth 2 points ago +2 / -0

781%....sheeeeeetttttt....rookie numbers

2
Aoikaze2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

So they went for the high score did they?

2
Ham_Sandwich77 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hey, maybe 791% turnout is just legitimate enthusiasm for Sleepy Joe, the most exciting presidential candidate in US history!

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

Massive massive fraud.

BuT tHIs WAs tHe MoSt sECurE eLecTiOn iN All oF HiStoRy!!!1!

2
PlateOwner 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the Louder with Crowder find?

2
GoldwaterVoter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anybody else notice that there are TWO paragraphs numbered '13' ???

This is clear and irrefutable evidence of ... just how fast all these amazing legal teams were working to SAVE OUR REPUBLIC!!!

2
ViduusMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Overrides using the dominion machines during the shutdown seems to be the consistent opportunity. The question is how they would cover it or would a hand recount expose it?

2
spez__ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why the fuck do our voting machines have a procedure to cast blank ballots?????

2
J_Von_Random 2 points ago +2 / -0

I could see legitimate use for something like that in testing. Should never be active in deployment.

2
Alvysyngr 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's next?