The original version of the affidavit had the stats for Minnesota precincts, so they corrected it and replaced all the stats with actual Michigan precincts. What's funny is, even the stats from Minnesota were just as bad as Michigan's, showing that it's fraud-riddled there as well.
A postscript: has Mr. Ramsland inadvertently stumbled across evidence of voter fraud in Minnesota? I seriously doubt it. The venues in question are all in red Greater Minnesota, not in the blue urban areas where voter fraud is common.
Suddenly we're back in the old ARPANET days and it takes observers being forced out to compromise the machines. Also he forgot the red 2016 Anterim county. Just a poison pill from the powerlineblog article
The original version of the affidavit had the stats for Minnesota precincts, so they corrected it and replaced all the stats with actual Michigan precincts. What's funny is, even the stats from Minnesota were just as bad as Michigan's, showing that it's fraud-riddled there as well.
That doesn't surprise me in the least... you mean to tell me Trump lost to Clinton by 0.5% but lost to Biden by over 2? Okay.
Guarantee we won MN as well.
You mean Massachusetts? Pretty sure MS is Mississippi.
Meant MN. Too many M states.
They were churning these out so fast they probably made one as a template and then used it for other state and didn’t make the switch.
It’s still sloppy but way better then I could do so I’m not going to arm chair quarterback. I’ve given up football anyway
Suddenly we're back in the old ARPANET days and it takes observers being forced out to compromise the machines. Also he forgot the red 2016 Anterim county. Just a poison pill from the powerlineblog article