I would argue it’s not misleading at all. It doesmy matter if it’s 781.654% or 410.342%, the concept is still the same. There’s fraud.
Trump does this a lot with his tweets, cite an incorrect number that the left argues the actual number is X but still completely proves his point.
The left/swamp does the opposite. They change the whole concept of the argument while keeping technically correct numbers but hide behind “but the number is taken out of context”
Anyone who argues that numbers don’t lie either doesn’t understand or is intentionally misleading that numbers are only simplification of observations so our minds can have a reference point.
Interestingly, 78.1% (moving the decimal in 781%) is almost exactly the percent of turnout in N. Muskegon. (Again, 2,648 voters out of 3,390 registered.)
I would argue it’s not misleading at all. It doesmy matter if it’s 781.654% or 410.342%, the concept is still the same. There’s fraud.
Trump does this a lot with his tweets, cite an incorrect number that the left argues the actual number is X but still completely proves his point.
The left/swamp does the opposite. They change the whole concept of the argument while keeping technically correct numbers but hide behind “but the number is taken out of context”
Anyone who argues that numbers don’t lie either doesn’t understand or is intentionally misleading that numbers are only simplification of observations so our minds can have a reference point.
There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.
Interestingly, 78.1% (moving the decimal in 781%) is almost exactly the percent of turnout in N. Muskegon. (Again, 2,648 voters out of 3,390 registered.)