In North Muskegon Michigan they reported a 781.91% turnout... uhhhhh... yeaah.... *cough* "BULLSHIT!" *cough*
(media.patriots.win)
🐂💩 BULLSHIT💩🐂
Comments (79)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Those are votes from people who identify as all 72 genders.
but there are only 2 genders, so sucks to be them
listen here, bigot
That is indeed the right pronoun in this case.
72 now? I thought it was 64
That makes you a bigot... How dare you!!!!
Don't ask me why but Mark Dice's Greta Thunberg impression is how I read "How dare you" 🤣🤣🤣
The future is now old man, keep up with the times.
64 was last week.
Next week it'll be 83.
80 million votes, 72 virgins and 64 genders, see a pattern?
Ahh, I see, 72 virgins, one of each gender because when you kick off they don't know your preference.
That was yesterday.
92 Genders
Does anyone have the hard numbers on this? Say, voters registered, population, voters in 2016 vs 2020?
Not able to find it myself
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Muskegon,_Michigan
Top KEK
The official Muskegon County site has the city of North Muskegon with only 2,648 votes (1,178 in precinct 1 and 1,470 for precinct 2)
https://co.muskegon.mi.us/DocumentCenter/View/10306/Precinct-Results-11-3-2020
Pdf with the results by precinct. Go to page 459 for precint 1, and 467 for precinct 2.
I have no idea were the guy got his numbers from but they bare no resemblance to what is on the county web site
https://co.muskegon.mi.us/507/Election-Results
It's 78.1% of turn out not 781%
THANK YOU
This makes a lot more sense, we need to be responsible for vetting data before we share it, wherever possible.
Let’s say it was normalized to 95%... it would still be way above 100%. It’s fucked no matter how you look at it.
Anything over 70 % turnout should be suspect
Lol seriously look at every precinct 90% or greater, lmfao no fucking way
What exactly is "Normalized" in this context. I'm assuming they didn't actually have more votes than registered voters in most of these precincts at least.
40% turnout is a high energy election.
50% turnout is suspicious.
75% is fraud.
100% or more is a major fuckup on the line above.
I’d bet a lot of these 100% are actually over 100% and don’t want to report the real percentage.
Or the cheaters filling out fake ballots had the brilliant idea to stop when the total ballots equalled the number of enrolled voters. Not realizing that 100% turnout is still absurd.
Anyway, apparently the 'encoded watermark on genuine ballots' story is actually true, and everyone that printed up fake ballots is severely screwed. Firing squads for enemy combatants in a national emergency election, type of screwed.
The 790% thing might be explained by the data used is before last minute registrations or something, so I don't care about that one as much as the 10 precincts that have exactly 100.00% voter turn out. No freaking way.
On a population of 3700? KEK
One man, one vote, unless you are from Muskegon. Then you get 8.
What filing is this from?
-Edit update: NM in his example he normalized the votes to 80% instead of reported to show the ridiculous turnout. Historically no precinct gets to 80%, most are sub 50% and high turnout is near 60%-
https://www.co.muskegon.mi.us/DocumentCenter/View/10306/Precinct-Results-11-3-2020
So this data from their Muskegon County website does not support this 781% claim. However the data they show is kinda off. Each precinct lists totals of Straight Party Ticket votes per party, then below that is individual vote totals for specific candidates.
The problem I am seeing, is that they are claiming these 2 sections are cumulative running totals, (and not Independent separate totals), but their own data violates that principal. The numbers in the top section (Straight Party Ticket) must be LESS than the numbers below. For example, if you had 100 people vote SPT, then all the candidates from THAT party would at a minimum have 100 votes, in addition to what they get from individually selected votes. There are instances of 3rd party candidates for President having higher SPT votes than their final individual or total votes. In most of the precincts of The City of Muskegon, there are 90-95% Biden and 5-10% Trump ballots.
What doc did this excerpt come from? Can we get a link?
First thing comes to mind when looking at everyone of these turnouts is ....naw that is BS. 100 is nearly impossible in it self
Even if that's a typo, look at all of the ones with 100% which is also suspect.
Anyone have a link to a total of the votes cast in North Muskegon?
So I would expect Muskegon to be full of shit cause they hood as fuk, but Zeeland? that's farm town, that should be all RED.
Yeah this seems to be some bullshit.
The official Muskegon County site has the city of North Muskegon with only 2,648 votes (1,178 in precinct 1 and 1,470 for precinct 2)
https://co.muskegon.mi.us/DocumentCenter/View/10306/Precinct-Results-11-3-2020
Pdf with the results by precinct. Go to page 459 for precint 1, and 467 for precinct 2.
I have no idea were the guy got his numbers from but they bare no resemblance to what is on the county web site
https://co.muskegon.mi.us/507/Election-Results
It's 78.1% of turn out not 781%
Why would voter data be normalized? Why wouldn't you straight report actual votes vs registered voters? Why would this be a thing?
Why are some at EXACTLY 100pct?
MI pede here. I hail from GR, but my godfather lives near Muskegon. North Muskegon is a really small area. There's no way they could have that many votes, and there is no way that they could have grown that much since the last census data. People are leaving that area since jobs have been leaving, and it's definitely not a place anyone moves to. In fact my sister's boyfriend just moved from there to live with my sister a few months ago, and said that everyone is looking to leave that area. Kinda sad to be honest, but lots of small towns in MI are dying because of China taking the jobs.
Seeing these numbers and living right next to all these cities is pretty mind blowing, tbh.
https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf
Thank you! This is amazing - I hadn't read this before now but it details the connection Dominion has to Smartmatic and Sequoia, Venezuela, that it can't be audited and how it all works.
Voting is insanely popular in North Muskegon. It's like meth in Oregon popular.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.14.pdf
Don’t worry, it’s just a glitch. Totally normal. 🙄
Such pure nonsense. Who believes these people?
Forget these little townships, what about Detroit? Hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes there?
THIS ONE PAGE for all we know could be enough to land A LOT of people in jail.
And I'm willing to bet that 98% of those votes went to Biden. The US election is a fken joke.
Found this, 2016 City of North Muskegon voter registration: Precinct 1: 1454 Precinct 2: 1584 Total: 3038
2020 Registration: Total: 3390
Voted this year: Precinct 1: 1178 Precinct 2: 1470 Total: 2648
So it's no longer true that the living outnumber the dead?
Just asking is this how many people voted in the polling place.
or is this a percentage increase over the last election of voters in that polling place?
City of North Muskegon 2020 census = 3,786.
Portion of population under 18=24.9%. Soz 0.75X3,786=2839.5.
So we can estimate # of people of voting age to be 2,840 more or less.
2,840X781.91=2,220,624.4 Votes from a City of 3,786.
That's a lot of votes...
Your math is wrong.
(3,786×(1−(24.9/100)))×(781.9/100)=22,232 extra votes.
Still crazy odd though.
why the divide by 100 last step? That's the part I did not do and why I'm off 2 orders of mag
It’s a percentage. 50% would be half or 1/2 or 0.5 or 50/100. 780% is 780/100 = 7.8
gotcha. kinda high maybe
gotcha I see it. 200% of 100 is 200. So X2 not X200. Man I'm a little embarrassed
Look at it this way, with your math skills you're still more than qualified for a job in the MSM, CDC, or Dominion.
Don't be embarrassed. The election officials that thought 20000 votes from an area that had 2000 voters and still thought there was no fraud, should be embarrassed.
The fact that you recognize the initial error, and that it's thanksgiving and you're a patriot surrounded by a bunch of other patriots means that it's all good brotha!
Ok I figured out why I was wrong. Lame excuse but this is it. I deal with reality so literally never deal with %'s over 100%. You can't have real data that is over 100%. I literally never do calculations with %'s over 100% because obviously the data set is wrong. Go back and fix it and try again is what I'd tell my students.
Ridiculous cheating isn't an exact science pede....
my bad I see it
Hi, you said there are 2840 persons of voting age, but the certified result said 3390 registered voters. One thing must be wrong.
Why is Zeeland Charter Township listed twice, second line and then the last location listed after the break?
Did they really not anticipate this many Trump voters? They had to pause the counts and stuff the ballot box to such a degree no honest person can dismiss that there was something gravely wrong here.