7118
Comments (244)
sorted by:
278
Saxonlady 278 points ago +278 / -0

Wow! If its not physically possible, it can't count. Not a complicated allegation at all.

138
novembergirl 138 points ago +138 / -0

You don't even need to be good at math to understand this. But... it still might be too difficult for leftards to wrap their head around.

84
skizzymarz 84 points ago +84 / -0

I honestly don’t care what the left can or cannot wrap their head around at this point. They managed to wrap most of the country’s heads around living in a lockdown for the year. Now it’s their turn to learn some math at the very least

50
ClownTamer 50 points ago +50 / -0

They’re not going to learn math. They’re going to do what they always do with this and read CNN or WaPo saying it’s been deboonked and say ‘HA! FUCK YOU, DRUMPF’. It’s up to the courts and people open to hearing it to believe it, then refuse to budge on it until there is a complete and thorough investigation, or votes are thrown out, or the results aren’t certified.

This whole thing’s bigger than who won. In the event Biden did win, congrats to him, all evidence to the contrary. If Trump had won, however, and the left had MASSIVE amounts of evidence indicating that Trump/we had committed mass acts of voter fraud on multiple levels, I would not accept those results, and neither would they. If elections aren’t fair, that’s a larger issue than who won or not. If we had tape of Trump with his finger on the scale I would not support him. We basically have that of Biden.

The left are hypocrites in direct proportion to how much of a leftist they are. It’s really on us to rally together and present things and red pill people and collectively refuse to budge until justice is rendered. Maybe they look into all this and the Biden ballots make perfect sense? Great! We can all move on. We all know that won’t happen, but I’d be okay with that outcome if Biden had legit won. The main thing is that this is treated seriously and to our satisfaction. After 4 years of us winning and them at times hunting us down and killing us for it, I will not accept a fraudulent election or any olive branch from them under these circumstances. They can eat a bag of commie dicks.

20
Conservativechick 20 points ago +20 / -0

"They’re not going to learn math. They’re going to do what they always do with this and read CNN or WaPo saying it’s been deboonked"

Literally having this conversation with my son right now....

16
ClownTamer 16 points ago +16 / -0

The deboonks are at times so bad I take it as a confirmation of the claim being true. It’s literally shit like ‘Joe Biden didn’t sell influence, Hunter Biden did on his behalf,’ or ‘there was no widespread voter fraud, there is just widespread evidence of voter fraud.’

They write shit like that and I take it as them acknowledging it’s true. They wouldn’t have to tard so hard if it weren’t true.

All of this shit comes back to the fact that if there is no fraud then they wouldn’t have any issues with a thorough audit.

2
SaltyCookie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also notice: the fad of "fact check" articles will have a blaring headline, but the article will "debunk" 2 or 3 items that weren't in the headline.

1
ClownTamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I made a post the other day of Reddit’s front page that had a headline saying something had been disproven, then the title of the actual article they linked directly too said the opposite. At this point ‘fact checks’ don’t have to extend beyond the mention of them because clearly only conservatives read them.

2
SoldierofKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right and by wide spread they spin it as every state every county. Of course there's no fraud I'm republican counties idiot! My definition of wide spread is more than one location. There was fraud in 5 big counties in swing states and the numbers were padded in a few blue states like commiefornia so that they can go with the muh popular vote.

1
ClownTamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Them fact checking that in their articles is hilarious.

“We called a guy that would be fired if there was a fraud in an area nobody cares about their being fraud and asked him if there was enough fraud that would cause him to be fired. He is on record in a sworn affidavit saying ‘nah’.”

The fact that everybody’s trying so hard to skirt around this is confirmation to me, at least of the fact that they think Biden didn’t win and that there was likely fraud.

1
MAGAnology 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like this. However, one question comes to mind: How many machines were in the 4 referenced Detroit locations? Here's some quick math.

2000 max # of ballots/hour/machine estimated. 2 hours + (38 mins / 60 mins) = 2.6334 hours. 2000 * 2.6334 ≈ 5267 max # of ballots/machine.

94867 calculated as max # of processable ballots. 94867 / 5267 ≈ 18 min # of machines required for all 4 locations, based on the given data.

384733 counted ballots / 94867 ≈ 4.0555 times more machines required in total. 18 * 4.0555 ≈ 73 min # of machines required for all 4 locations, based on the given data.

73 / 4 locations = 18.25 min # of machines per location to process 384733 ballots in 2.6334 hours, assuming 2000 ballots per hour per machine, or 5267 ballots per machine within 2 hours and 38 mins.

Only thing left to do is find out how many Dominion machines were in these 4 locations, and compare them to: 5267 * ?? actual # of machines = 384733.

Assuming they know the total # of machines that were in the 4 Detroit locations in total (likely 18 machines), they should include how many Dominion machines were actually in Detroit, if they haven't already. Godspeed.

5
coffee_grdr 5 points ago +5 / -0

"they're not going to learn math"

yes, while at the same time saying they only believe in "science" and anyone who disagrees with the lockdowns is anti-science!

isn't it amazing?! its like a really, really devout religious person who will quickly throw away their beliefs to win an argument!

1
Bobb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Need to resolve it at the root level, ie take out the fake news with extreme prejudice.

1
SoldierofKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

But but jim acosta, but anderson pooper said.

5
FormerGraveheart 5 points ago +5 / -0

In the event Biden did win, congrats to him

Why is it okay for someone to take away everyone's freedom, take away everyone's guns, impoverish everyone with lockdowns, and flood the country with third world savages if he wins legally?

2
AUS4MAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

BuT mUh CoLoNiAl CoNsTrUcT

2
ClownTamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

We should let all ardent leftists segregate themselves and make their own schools without math and reason and real science and let us teach our kids useful things, which include math. 20 years go by, and we’ll have a retard farm.

8
RandomUzer 8 points ago +8 / -0

their game is to play 'we believe in X' when they could give a flying fuck about it. all they care about is power. fear is too that they use. fear of being ignorant. fear of being cast out. fear of being mocked. fear of death. fear of hurting someone else. fear someone will do something they just made up just for you. fear is their tool.

2
coffee_grdr 2 points ago +2 / -0

simplifying it a little bit, their game play is to repeat a lie (biden won) over and over again and expecting everyone to just accept it.

1
RandomUzer 1 point ago +1 / -0

absolutely. lie amplification is one of their tools. they have many. fear like i point out. persuasion is also a tool. a powerful one. for this one you could almost calling a 'mockingbird' :) these tools are what they use. reading rules for radicals will show many what they are doing and what they admire. i call it a checklist on how to be an asshole. but the techniques work. you have to be ready for them and spot out their lies of fear and lies of omission.

4
SvixGale 4 points ago +4 / -0

The only thing commies are gonna wrap their heads around is a 7.62.

Soon.

2
Morpheus75 2 points ago +2 / -0

Common core bruh...

21
donaldismydad 21 points ago +22 / -1

agreed, at this point i believe the only remedy will be for SCOTUS to declare the winner whosoever was in the lead by 12 midnight election day, Nov. 3rd, those who cry "muh disenfranchisement of black urban voters" should cry more to their corrupt beyond belief metro detroit, philly, atlanta, and milwaukee election officials, who decided to shart all over DJT45's landslide reeeeeeelection victory.

3
BoatMcBoatface 3 points ago +3 / -0

SCOTUS can only say yes/no to whatever they are being petitioned for. So far no lawsuit asks for the remedy you mention

2
BestTimeToBAlive 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some cases now ask for: throwing out all mail in ballots that weren’t in chain of custody or watched when opened, throwing out ALL mail in ballots altogether, deleting all ballots that were tabulated without anyone watching, reversing decision of who won the state, holding a special election & refusing to certify the state.

I would take any of these. But my sincerest hope is for states to grant Trump the clear winner now, in light of the disgusting fraud that debased our whole nation

1
donaldismydad 1 point ago +1 / -0

i see, so what is the remedy for SCOTUS order issued to pennsylvania to segregate all ballots received after 8pm election day, which they flat out IGNORED? SCOTUS can be ignored without consequence, save only for a petition to enforce punishment of said court order?

1
BoatMcBoatface 1 point ago +1 / -0

The question is pretty much moot as no one puts any weight to that issue, especially not Rudy in his PA case.

However, in a grand scheme of things, even if every single court was packed with Trump fanatics, the cases lawyers bring before them allege process issue/constitutional violation at best.

For instance, if envelopes or ballots are shredded, does that mean the results should be invalidated? This would mean county officials could invalidate results they didn’t like.

Same for process issue - you are a Red county in CA (or a blue county in TX), introduce a process issue, state results invalidated.

Even Rudy in his PA ‘ballots curing’ case realises that as he says the ballot curing was allowed because Dems wanted to defraud Trump. But then he backtracks and says, but officially, no fraud is alleged in this case.

So what judges are supposed to do?

2
boomerbutnotOKBoomer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amen - this is the first year people had almost a MONTH to vote. I they didn't get it in by midnight voting day... OH WELL

1
coffee_grdr 1 point ago +1 / -0

THIS.

and its 2020 so if we all really believe in science then we should expect the results to be tabulated, and the results (with detailed statistics) released online that night. for everyone to see. the supposed "journalists" and regular people would have free access to verify the integrity.

each ballot should have an id that can be identified and tracked. when it was mailed, when it was returned, or when the voter voted and what location, when it was actually counted and who handled it.

16
ClarenceBeeks 16 points ago +16 / -0

They will say it adds up perfectly because of tranny rights and Russia

8
MAGA_Skull 8 points ago +8 / -0

i am two genders therefore i get two votes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

4
coffee_grdr 4 points ago +4 / -0

i'm giving you an upvote just for saying tranny!

the word isn't used enough!

10
Lovepede 10 points ago +10 / -0

So does the machine keep a record of which adminsitrators/supervisors were logged in, or which user accounts were active during the time period in question? They should be forced to kick the chair away for the others before hanging themselves.

17
Taylor3006 17 points ago +17 / -0

You know this would make sense for a machine used for voting. My problem is that the machine are DESIGNED to cheat. Who the hell makes a damn voting machine where in the fucking instruction manual, it tells you how to weight votes? What kinds of morons decided to buy them for use in the USA?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
skidookid 4 points ago +4 / -0

I work for a software company and THIS ^^ right here is why I am SO mad about all of this.WHY was twitmer allowed to buy this shit for Michigan? Why is it even used in the USA. (Sorry I hate her she ruined my once good name now I have to change it)

3
coffee_grdr 3 points ago +3 / -0

at the very least, these system should be "glitch" free! its not sending a rocket to mars, its counting ballots! that's it. counting... ballots.

the left loves climate-change modeling, self-driving cars, their personal data being "in the cloud", and the idea that automation will take over all jobs in 10 years, but... happily say "oh well, the computer had a glitch" and they're okay with that!!

like a calculator that adds 2 plus 2 equals 16!!! and they're still willing to rely on it!!! crazy!

6
EaglesFanInPhx 6 points ago +6 / -0

It doesn't matter, their logs are editable.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
10
EaglesFanInPhx 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nope, their logs are directly editable per the affidavits. You can delete, modify, add, etc.

6
skidookid 6 points ago +6 / -0

I read that in the Michigan affidavit and was SO furious. That is NOT THE NORM. Not at ALL. Not anywhere. No reputable software ANYWHERE would allow directly editable audit logs. Defeats the purpose.

3
Junionthepipeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well the purpose is fraud so ...

2
EaglesFanInPhx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly.. that's like database 101.

4
SvixGale 4 points ago +4 / -0

WHAT THE FUCK????!!?!

Holy shit man. Fucking unbelievable.

5
thefacesitter 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've stopped calling them voting machines. They're election-stealing machines. That's literally what they're designed for. Unreal, the degrees of corruption and incompetence that allowed this to happen.

5
doug2 5 points ago +5 / -0

That they deleted

1
KrakenIncomming 1 point ago +3 / -2

Correct there always is a trail

10
trogdortheburninator 10 points ago +10 / -0

No, there's not. Source: am a software developer.

98% of software is ripe fucking garbage. Especially if it's a from a commercial environment. In fact, the small, simple, open source tools are the 2% of things that are good.

11
Hemirocket 11 points ago +11 / -0

I second this comment. Logs are usually only good if they are captive and only the overseers have access to them, otherwise unless you catch it real-time you generally won't be able to do any meaningful forensics. Well, unless the suspects are just really stupid which is entirely possible

6
NomadicKrow 6 points ago +7 / -1

They're just going to try to run the clock out and try to convince as many people as they can that Biden won. It's in their playbook.

4
doug2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
11
BestTimeToBAlive 11 points ago +11 / -0

This was also mentioned during the PA hearing yesterday.

This def shows that it’s a pattern going on across the USA. Not just “voter fraud” but actually systemic, planned election fraud.

10
Konrad 10 points ago +10 / -0

No, not as planned as you think.

Spygate was planned. Contractor access to the NSA database was being used to surveil Republican campaigns. OCONUS lures were sent against Trump people overseas to try and make them chase dodgy Russians with dirt on Hillary.

But then they got punched in the face and their plan went to shit.

Admiral Mike Rogers shut down contractor access to the NSA database on 18 April 2016. He blinded them. They had to send in HUMINT (Downer) and found out way too late that Papadopoulos hadn't taken Mifsud's bait. Everything from there on was unplanned squealing panic.

Same with the election steal. Dims would play their traditional ground game, only all the way to 11. Ballot harvesting, voting the graveyard, controlling vote counting, destroying military ballots and "helping" seniors use rigged machines. They even added a trick: sharpies to force ballots into manual adjudication they controlled.

But the deep state controller's of the Uniparty puppets also went all the way to 11. Activating the "weighted race" function in the tally software, even above 2.2% in some states. Then intermittent manual vote flipping in a three shell game between Trump, Biden and third party in multiple states.

But then Trump's (and your) red wave punched them in the face, and their plans went to shit.

Multi state 2.00am count freeze? Mass dumps of hastily forged mail in ballots marked for only one candidate delivered with no chain of custody? Biden vote spikes that exceed the scanning/time physical constraints? This is like judge shopping to get a FISA warrant on a paid FBI informant who had been a critical FBI witness in a case against real Russian operatives just months earlier. Insane moves decided by corrupt actors in sqealing panic after their plans went to shit.

2
BestTimeToBAlive 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know your shit inside & out ... and I thank you for this comment!

Yes, as always, the Dems overplayed their hand bc they are arrogant. Covid lockdowns, George Floyd race riots, mail in ballot stuffing, computer vote tabulation skewing. Always overdo it & ruin it.

I have read all of the evidence. I am beside myself with what I’ve learned throughout the past 4 years... but especially now in the past few months.

This election was the most disgusting evil shit & I will not accept these lying fraudulent standings as they are now. I will not accept these obvious lies & I pray our state legislatures & SCOTUS won’t either.

4
scooterdog 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Dems were hard at work in the run up to the election.

Not in making Joe Biden attractive as a candidate in the least.

Only setting up the fraud to be as streamlined and targeted as possible.

4
10MeV 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. That's why Biden was hidin' in the basement. Just to stay quiet and out of sight until the fraud was performed election night.

8
WakeUpWorld 8 points ago +8 / -0

They used all these local citizens to do the fraud so they can blame them if caught. And then blame Trump for creating an atmosphere where citizens revolted by cheating

2
BAHBSpindell 2 points ago +3 / -1

RASSIST!

109
FreedomfighterNY 109 points ago +109 / -0

That should make every American question this. Easy to follow.

21
magacoder 21 points ago +21 / -0

This is really the reason they switched to common core.

10
BAHBSpindell 10 points ago +11 / -1

I argued with my wife about sending our kids to private school, but after seeing how they attempt to indoctrinate your children in these public schools, I think I'm going to have to give in.

Although, I'm not 100% sure you can even avoid it in a private school now.

13
Fideetveritate 13 points ago +14 / -1

homeschool, then you have control over what gets in.

1
BAHBSpindell 1 point ago +2 / -1

I wish I could. Unfortunately both me and the wife work. I suppose I could put my career on hold since I work in tech, but I question whether or not I have the patience to teach a young child.

Maybe start homeschooling at 3rd or 5th grade.

-8
bighomiebeenchillin -8 points ago +3 / -11

nah then they finna be anti social bitch niggas that nobody likes

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
-6
bighomiebeenchillin -6 points ago +1 / -7

ur a low iq nigga if u think that’s what i was sayin. lil niggas need to socialize with grips of other kids. if they don’t they become socially stupid nigga and have no friends. they da type of kid that says some dumb shit n gets his bitch ass shoved in da locker. no bitches no social skills for career.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
9
Jimmy33 9 points ago +9 / -0

Some private schools are leftist hellholes, so choose wisely.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Nori 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's very unfortunate that we don't get a choice. So much money goes into schools, yet if we homeschool or send to private school we get no help.

7
Tejas_Pepe 7 points ago +8 / -1

This is another one of those things Dinesh D'Souza talked about that we need answers to. It's a simple question and should be easy to answer. If it's true, it's a really, really big deal.

9
doug2 9 points ago +9 / -0

Why do we keep saying shit like this. Of fucking course it's true, we know it and should not let them create any semblance of "reasonable doubt." What happened is IMPOSSIBLE and the only explanation is widespread, purposeful, illegal fraud.

-1
Tejas_Pepe -1 points ago +4 / -5

There's this thing called due process. Sorry if you don't like it but even murders get a chance to defend themselves from accusations. If they can't give a satisfactory answer then there is no doubt. Doesn't matter if you and I believe it, we do, we have to prove it.

8
SvixGale 8 points ago +8 / -0

Youre technically correct.

But a more accurate comparison would be:

  • murder scene
  • you are at the scene
  • dead body
  • victims blood is all over you
  • you are scratched & bruised; your dna & skin is under the victims fingernails.
  • you have a bloody knife in your pocket.
  • victim was clearly stabbed to death
  • you claim you don’t know what happened.
  • tell cops you are innocent

Should you get “due process”? Sure.

Is there any chance you are innocent?

The fuck do you guys think?

THAT is what’s going on here except with votes and communists.

6
Tejas_Pepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm way past any doubt, I know they cheated. I want to see the proof presented and ballots thrown out, and the people who did it in jail.

1
SvixGale 1 point ago +1 / -0

You misspelled "executed for treason"

69
Zuko_Epic 69 points ago +69 / -0

Should nullify Michigan results? And Kraken would nullify GA? And PA nullified by all the fraud and supreme court?--->Seems like the most likely path, and pedo joe would be under the fake 270. Then it goes to the House.

Or, if Republican legislatures man up, then they could give the electors to Trump, and he would win by being above 270, and rightfully so. In any case, its gonna be a war

25
MakeAmericaLegendary 25 points ago +25 / -0

Right now, I see the most likely path as

WI through recount and signature-audit

PA through, well, it's PA

and NV or AZ depending on next week.

19
PresidentErectHunter 19 points ago +19 / -0

What about Georgia. Only ~10,000 votes behind. Atlanta fraud alone should flip it.

9
MakeAmericaLegendary 9 points ago +9 / -0

GA isn't playing nice. But if we get a case through court there, then yes. GA.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
doug2 4 points ago +6 / -2

Who cares? This guy has no idea. The only predictions I trust are those of the people closest to the front lines, i.e Trump, rudy, powell. And they are all 100% confident.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Course you can, just saying dont get all worked up about it.

1
CensorMeTendies2016 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. Doug2 needs to be involved with every conversation

2
MakeAmericaLegendary 2 points ago +2 / -0

That really depends on how the hearings go in both states next week. In NV, it's in front of a judge. In AZ, it's in front of the legislature (like in PA).

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
5
Rocks_vs_Uzis 5 points ago +5 / -0

We're already in a war. This is 4th generation warfare. National armies have been obsolete for quite some time.

2
bigdickhangsright 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't want to nullify Michigan entirely if there was cheating only in certain areas. Throw out the corrupt counties, send the cheating fucks somewhere, and throw all of these voting machines in Lake St. Clair.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
doug2 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're doing a signature review, Bannon says its ours and seemed more confident than anywhere else. I'm not sure why.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
47
Data 47 points ago +47 / -0

They frauded too fast and too desperately and fucked the whole thing up.

5
RawRamen 5 points ago +5 / -0

They didn't have a choice. Trump CRUSHED Biden, and the only way to make it look like Biden won was to add that many fake votes.

3
Data 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well they could have, you know... NOT CHEATED.

39
BeingFree 39 points ago +39 / -0

Mr. Ramsland is one of the most competent professionals out there. I have total faith in the work he and his associates have done wrt Dominion. They've been working in this area for years. Here is an excellent interview of Mr. Ramsland where he explains how these voting systems can be compromised.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
VinceVonVroom 4 points ago +4 / -0

Apparently the new affidavit was fixed.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
VinceVonVroom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Says who

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
VinceVonVroom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please. Everybody with a functioning brain understands these cases are, by necessity, being put together on an unbelievably fast schedule because of the electoral clock. The error has been amended and in no way negates the massive evidence accumulated and presented.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
BeingFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which "districts" mentioned in the affidavit are not located in Michigan? Maybe I missed it but I don't see any. As far as I can tell every precinct and/or township he mentions is located in Michigan. Please post the specific quote from the affidavit to which you are asserting a "significant" error. Would like very much to find out.

This is the filed affidavit I'm working from: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18693929/1/14/king-v-whitmer/

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
BeingFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you can't quote from the filed affidavit because it isn't there is it. If you want to believe the WaPo knock yourself out.

Everyone of the townships presented in the MI filed case affidavit by Mr Ramsland is located in Michigan. You need to quote the asserted errors or stop spreading disinformation.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
BeingFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is not from the affidavit filed in Michigan. Are you retarded?

Here is the case that has been filed in Michigan. Mr. Ramsland's affidavit is attached as item 14. Please quote from this document. That should be easy for a sharp WaPo reader but you can't because what you're asserting isn't in there. At this point it seems you're just being obtuse.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
1in1024th 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was it 1hr38 or 2hr38? Title doesn't match text

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
1
scooterdog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really makes you wonder - what if the vote wasn’t overwhelming, only close, and the foolish polls actually suppressing the vote doing what they typically do.

They would have gotten away with it.

We were the “shy” Trump voter, rather the invisible FU Trump voter, who doesn’t care about your feelings and darn it our voice will be heard.

16
CrackheadHunter1 16 points ago +16 / -0

We cannot allow them to steal the election. Honestly, this is a disgrace to this country.

2
doug2 2 points ago +3 / -1

I haven't had a chance to say this and have been hesitant to because of those stupid ass commercials, but ....

Thank you captain obvious.

0
CrackheadHunter1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Go suck a fat dick.

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heyyyy

14
raynman33 14 points ago +14 / -0

Excellent. very energizing

10
KyrosQF 10 points ago +10 / -0

289,866 at least. Probably way way more.

9
MastaJoda 9 points ago +9 / -0

We’ve got so many SMOKING GUNS, we’re going to need another gun safe!

9
Staatssicherheit 9 points ago +9 / -0

My first question would be which county and specifically which precincts reported these 289,866 ballots. Shine a light on these big city electoral worker cockroaches.

9
Nrdrsr 9 points ago +9 / -0

Are these dudes speculating based on whatever data is publicly available? Or are they insiders?

Because usually the rebuttal to that is easy - they just say "Oh this is not true we had 10 machines" or "we started counting way earlier and held back the number for a while" and it ends there. Their explanation becomes plausible and the speculation dies.

6
marishiten 6 points ago +6 / -0

The machines are inventoried and their model/serial numbers are available. If they used other machines, those machines wouldn't be certified to be in use, nullifying it anyway.

They COULD be slimy and say 'the machines don't update the totals in real time, but hold the tally in RAM. Once the machine CPU is no longer under load, the tally is updated and the numbers are sent by bulk.' Or they could say 'due to heavy network traffic, poll number updates were lagged. When there was network bandwidth available, that totals were mass updated.'

Now, you could argue that the CPU wouldn't fuck the graph up like it did making that excuse moot.

The second one is POSSIBLE if the tally numbers dropped to 0 for x amount of time but you could calibrate that in the graph. Which I imagine they did and it still doesn't look right. Also, these machines aren't supposed to be online. So there's that.

Either way, there's no real good excuse for these large spikes.There's no way to worm your way out with a somewhat logical explanation. Even IF there was a non malicious explanation (doubt it), all this shit falls on the equipment used. Dominion. If the equipment was faulty, it shouldn't have been certified. If if was, that's Dominion's fault. They might try to pin it on Dominion being incompetent. But it still invalidates all those ballots. So it doesn't really matter.

I'd love to hear from an actual Dominion employee about the bullshit going on. They have to be scared that someone is going to kill them if they talk. I'd imagine Eric Coomer is hiding in a dirty hovel in Bolivia praying SOCOM doesn't find where he is. Because he's going to be in a real world of shit if Trump gets his hands on him.

1
BravoEcho 1 point ago +2 / -1

Even if the large spikes could be explained, several detailed analysis for the hours and days following the mid-night data dump have demonstrated the algorithm(s) that were used to maintain Biden's lead. Specifically, the raw data from the NY Times produced several un-natural phenomena such as set percentages for Biden/Trump which would randomly switch (then change, then switch again) between precincts to disguise what was happening, vote switching (as seen on the CNN video clip), etc.

1
Nrdrsr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tbh it's probably a big company it won't be hard to find someone who works there.

A girl could probably get one of them to talk very easily, even over the phone.

6
NoCountry4Commies [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, but coupled with impossible voter turnout, like 781% in one district - enough to show reasonable doubt, and that legally where the bar is set. Look at these turnout numbers: https://thedonald.win/p/11QSCGhpoc/wow-north-muskegon-mi-----781-vo/c/

8
FL2PC72LE 8 points ago +8 / -0

Okay, folks, it looks like this case was assigned to a Judge Linda Vivienne Parker, who is a Democrat, and black. I can't imagine she's going to want to hear any of this. Sorry to make assumptions, but she was appointed by Obama.

Under her name it says "referred to R. Steven Whalen," who seems to be one of those testy older men, white, "non-partisan" but has a reputation for being slow.

I'm worried they'll slow-walk it to try and run out the clock. Is there any safe-guard against this?

4
Zeriel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why do we allow Judges to decide the law basically on their political affiliation. It's so fucking stupid that you already know the result of every court by just knowing the affiliation of the judge. There isn't even a sliver of integrity!! In fact we have the 100% immoral Dems together with Rinos on our side! Why can't we make a justice system where the judges are not partisan? We wouldn't be in this problem if Justice was impartial.

1
scooterdog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thus all the moaning and groaning from Laura I, Rush, even Scott Adam’s about how unlikely it was to overturn the results.

Courts are allergic to mess with election results: we are in uncharted territory here. Who with a pair of eyes cannot see the cheating?

Regardless of party affiliation, the defendants will appeal the result, and so it will go.

We’re living through history, it is going to be a wild ride.

The Trump March should provide great visual contrast to the activity in the courts. I’m expecting YUUUGE turnout and enthusiasm to take back our country.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
Rodger_Rabbit 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why don't they get the machines and personnel back together and have them repeat this miraculous feat? I think it should be televised so everyone can see how they do this.

5
Tantalus4200 5 points ago +5 / -0

Boom

5
djgLXXII 5 points ago +5 / -0

Are these ballots even real?

I was a poll watcher the night of the election (not in a relevant state, mind you) and I noticed that they could report to whomever whatever numbers they wanted. If you were with a team of dishonest people at the polling station, one could easily call in with, "Oh yeah Biden got 5 billion votes, Trump got 1".

3
TheRock976 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a joke.

5
Pure_Coincidence 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is reminding me of trying to do the math to figure out how many cookies you can bake in industrial ovens over a period of a few years.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
4
CJBarnacle 4 points ago +4 / -0

I just watched that video. Absolutely disgusting. Dude is not a fighter at all.

2
Zeriel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe he's just a dumb ass and if voter fraud is proven then he keeps his post.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
skidookid 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was extremely disappointed in him. I was so excited to meet him and then vote for him again...and he did this. I agree that Peters is the biggest cuck out there and John James is showing his RINO horns :( I'm almost hoping he was being pressured so as to hold out to my belief he isn't a wolf in a twitmer sheep's clothes.

5
urallphux 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is great news. You are all awesome. Have a happy thanksgiving everybody.

We'll be welcoming President Trump to his 2nd term soon

5
BoughtByBloomberg2 5 points ago +5 / -0

DNC operative 1: "Uh it says on the side of the machine it has an 80000 vote limit per hour."

DNC operative 2: "We'll have to risk it! Trump is blowing us out the fucking water!"

5
fjobb 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think it more likely they had no idea on the technical specs, and didn't even consider it until it started getting called out. Now they'll pretend the laws of physics don't matter if they contradict the narrative. This is the sort of stuff where you can quickly determine how corrupt judges are when ruling on objective things.

4
streakybacon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Very, very nice.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
geocitiesuser 5 points ago +5 / -0

1776

3
Konrad 3 points ago +3 / -0

As a non US citizen, I would advise that you focus on the "no taxation without representation" bit of 1776, not the guns and the violence.

American citizens own over 450 million firearms, have bought up all available ammunition, and seem to have an urge to use it all up.

You don't need to do CW2. Your oppressors need you, your labour and your tax. Those 450 million firearms? Trump supporters own most of those. They also pay most of the tax. And they mostly live in homes paying a mortgage to a bank.

Biden is illegally installed as President? Just stop paying tax and stop paying your mortgage. Stand together so they can't pick you off one by one. No Sheriff or Bailiff would try to evict a single family from a single house if every time they tried, minute men and women in their hundreds armed with AR15s flooded the street. You won't need to fire a single round.

You are the host. They are the parisites. They can only feed off you if you let them.

1
geocitiesuser 1 point ago +1 / -0

If we don't pay taxes, they will come after us with their guns.

4
Power 4 points ago +4 / -0

Now I’m just wondering..... just curious here, is there some possible way that the machines can count for a certain amount of time, and then upload their count? I know this sounds like a left wing idea but I’m just thinking of what their response might be in court.

Like vote machines count for hours and then bang they all upload at the same time?

3
TheRock976 3 points ago +3 / -0

It should be pretty straightforward to demonstrate. I guess they could say we scanned ballots the previous day but it looks like this could be the silver bullet.

2
bbxx 2 points ago +2 / -0

If we had an FBI that was doing their job, the voting machines would have been seized by now and a forensic analysis in progress...

4
TheRock976 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is one of the best pieces of evidence I've heard yet.

3
badbeachboy 3 points ago +3 / -0

hmmm maybe one of those lovely thumbdrives got inserted that was touring other cities...

3
SpaceForceMAGA 3 points ago +4 / -1

Nothing to see here, this isn’t evidence, move along.

3
Goozmania 3 points ago +5 / -2

Here's where I'm confused... On election night, it was shown that people from various polling centers were coming to the main counting chamber with flash cards, holding all the votes that had been counted from their center... this is where the big spikes came from; not from ongoing individual counting.

So, to me, the arguments of "they couldn't have counted this much" make no sense, because they didn't, really... it was just polling centers uploading their data.

If I'm right, then this is not what we should be arguing. We should be arguing the validity of a random person, with no security or chain of command, uploading data.

3
NoCountry4Commies [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think you are mistaken. There are ballots gathered and verified at outlying locations that are bagged up, and delivered to the counting center where they are supposed to be validated again and then run through the machines. This according to WAPO. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/11/05/vote-count-michigan-no-fraud/

0
Goozmania 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is one of the things I'm referring to:

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/524415-milwaukee-election-official-given-police-escort-to-turn-in-absentee

Some woman had a flash card full of votes that she just uploaded.

1
aconcernedtroll 1 point ago +1 / -0

Were those ballot receipts?

Bc the machines can print whatever receipt for a given ballot they want as well.

3
Trumpman1 3 points ago +3 / -0

So this makes how many more states we're gonna win? I'm losing count. :-)

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
leakmouth 3 points ago +3 / -0

How can they possibly try to install Biden in light of everything coming out? The only reason I’m still dooming and skeptical is because no bad guys have been named and this as not a one man operation.

7
JeremiahKassin 7 points ago +7 / -0

They own the media. They think that's enough. We own the court system, though. That, and my faith that God will not abandon a nation that sincerely voted for a return to biblical values, is what leads me to believe we'll win.

2
TehAgent 2 points ago +2 / -0

The beast doesnt have to have a head, unfortunately. An analogy I used before was this:

I was playing a card game at a family event last year. I kept winning over and over; not just winning but utterly destroying everyone.

The last game we played, it was me vs 3 others. They were not discussing what to do or showing each other their hands. However, it was quite clear that they were working together, trying to defeat me. In this case there was no 'conspiracy' so to say - just a group of people that wanted me to lose, working independently yet together.

This is what happened election night. Some aspects of cheating may have had a head, but the circle would have been small so as to remain secret. However, others, acting on their own, cheated on their own way acting independently yet with aggregate result.

I won that card game. Donald Trump will win his.

3
CJBarnacle 3 points ago +3 / -0

The lack of transparency from these Democrat crooks should be enough to get the election overturned.

3
WANGIroll20s 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can we confirm that they only had one machine in this precinct?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Ch138 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nationwide revote. No same day signup, in person, only. No absentee. Paper ballots.

3
Dckman 3 points ago +3 / -0

C'mon man! It's one of those new fancy machines that can count super fast! MALARKEY

3
Staatssicherheit 3 points ago +3 / -0

What response did the Secretary of State have on this question? How are our enemies explaining this 384,733 ballot drop? Can we think of an alternative explanation ourselves?

I need more details.

1
Observation 1 point ago +1 / -0

How are our enemies explaining this 384,733 ballot drop? Can we think of an alternative explanation ourselves?

I think we need more information before we can make a solid conclusion — the affidavit just doesn't supply nearly the amount of data and analysis that we all need. Here was the chart included with the affidavit, showing the four counties with the big vote spikes.

For one, though, it's not time-stamped at all.

In the main body, the affidavit says that all this took place only over two and a half hours. But how exactly is it even calculating this? Is that the time-span between the first vote spike (Kent County) and the last one (Wayne), for example?

But that obviously wouldn't make sense — because it's not like these counties wait on the other counties to report before they start counting themselves. Clearly they were counting for some time leading up to the big spikes. But how much longer? Is the assumption that the count is "restarted" once each previous vote batch is reported by the county? (Though, again, the chart doesn't label any previous vote reports/spikes. For that matter, is this even a 100% solid assumption in the first place? Could there be concurrent counts that aren't "reset" upon each reported batch?)

3
TheRock976 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's a horrible politically sensitive analogy to this which CAN'T be disputed.

3
GodDamnedEngineer 3 points ago +3 / -0

THAT LADIES AND GENTLEMAN IS EVIDENCE FOR SYDNEY

2
Zeriel 2 points ago +2 / -0

But the judge is Democrat so any amount of evidence is completely useless :(

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Kyle1164 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is pretty good evidence. We need more evidence just as damning as this is...

2
TheGunFairy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same way everyone with computer knowledge knew immediately that all the Russia Hacked our emails stuff was bullshit too. The server logs , size of the files and the alleged amount of times the removals of the DNC data took place werent possible over the existing internet capabilities of the servers. It was easy to prove forensically that all the DNC emails were physically downloaded onsite by somebody with access to the servers.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Zeriel 2 points ago +2 / -0

What! No evidence at all! I mean dead people voting is not evidence right? So why would math and physical imposibilities be evidence? When are you conceding mr Trump!?!?

2
BigleaguendTouchee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Vote Looting.

It’s like they didn’t even care about being caught because every had been forced to stand down.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0