7118
Comments (244)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
21
donaldismydad 21 points ago +22 / -1

agreed, at this point i believe the only remedy will be for SCOTUS to declare the winner whosoever was in the lead by 12 midnight election day, Nov. 3rd, those who cry "muh disenfranchisement of black urban voters" should cry more to their corrupt beyond belief metro detroit, philly, atlanta, and milwaukee election officials, who decided to shart all over DJT45's landslide reeeeeeelection victory.

3
BoatMcBoatface 3 points ago +3 / -0

SCOTUS can only say yes/no to whatever they are being petitioned for. So far no lawsuit asks for the remedy you mention

2
BestTimeToBAlive 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some cases now ask for: throwing out all mail in ballots that weren’t in chain of custody or watched when opened, throwing out ALL mail in ballots altogether, deleting all ballots that were tabulated without anyone watching, reversing decision of who won the state, holding a special election & refusing to certify the state.

I would take any of these. But my sincerest hope is for states to grant Trump the clear winner now, in light of the disgusting fraud that debased our whole nation

1
donaldismydad 1 point ago +1 / -0

i see, so what is the remedy for SCOTUS order issued to pennsylvania to segregate all ballots received after 8pm election day, which they flat out IGNORED? SCOTUS can be ignored without consequence, save only for a petition to enforce punishment of said court order?

1
BoatMcBoatface 1 point ago +1 / -0

The question is pretty much moot as no one puts any weight to that issue, especially not Rudy in his PA case.

However, in a grand scheme of things, even if every single court was packed with Trump fanatics, the cases lawyers bring before them allege process issue/constitutional violation at best.

For instance, if envelopes or ballots are shredded, does that mean the results should be invalidated? This would mean county officials could invalidate results they didn’t like.

Same for process issue - you are a Red county in CA (or a blue county in TX), introduce a process issue, state results invalidated.

Even Rudy in his PA ‘ballots curing’ case realises that as he says the ballot curing was allowed because Dems wanted to defraud Trump. But then he backtracks and says, but officially, no fraud is alleged in this case.

So what judges are supposed to do?

2
boomerbutnotOKBoomer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amen - this is the first year people had almost a MONTH to vote. I they didn't get it in by midnight voting day... OH WELL

1
coffee_grdr 1 point ago +1 / -0

THIS.

and its 2020 so if we all really believe in science then we should expect the results to be tabulated, and the results (with detailed statistics) released online that night. for everyone to see. the supposed "journalists" and regular people would have free access to verify the integrity.

each ballot should have an id that can be identified and tracked. when it was mailed, when it was returned, or when the voter voted and what location, when it was actually counted and who handled it.