7118
Comments (244)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
EaglesFanInPhx 6 points ago +6 / -0

It doesn't matter, their logs are editable.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
10
EaglesFanInPhx 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nope, their logs are directly editable per the affidavits. You can delete, modify, add, etc.

6
skidookid 6 points ago +6 / -0

I read that in the Michigan affidavit and was SO furious. That is NOT THE NORM. Not at ALL. Not anywhere. No reputable software ANYWHERE would allow directly editable audit logs. Defeats the purpose.

3
Junionthepipeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well the purpose is fraud so ...

2
EaglesFanInPhx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly.. that's like database 101.

4
SvixGale 4 points ago +4 / -0

WHAT THE FUCK????!!?!

Holy shit man. Fucking unbelievable.

5
thefacesitter 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've stopped calling them voting machines. They're election-stealing machines. That's literally what they're designed for. Unreal, the degrees of corruption and incompetence that allowed this to happen.

5
doug2 5 points ago +5 / -0

That they deleted

1
KrakenIncomming 1 point ago +3 / -2

Correct there always is a trail

10
trogdortheburninator 10 points ago +10 / -0

No, there's not. Source: am a software developer.

98% of software is ripe fucking garbage. Especially if it's a from a commercial environment. In fact, the small, simple, open source tools are the 2% of things that are good.

11
Hemirocket 11 points ago +11 / -0

I second this comment. Logs are usually only good if they are captive and only the overseers have access to them, otherwise unless you catch it real-time you generally won't be able to do any meaningful forensics. Well, unless the suspects are just really stupid which is entirely possible