7118
Comments (244)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
17
Taylor3006 17 points ago +17 / -0

You know this would make sense for a machine used for voting. My problem is that the machine are DESIGNED to cheat. Who the hell makes a damn voting machine where in the fucking instruction manual, it tells you how to weight votes? What kinds of morons decided to buy them for use in the USA?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
skidookid 4 points ago +4 / -0

I work for a software company and THIS ^^ right here is why I am SO mad about all of this.WHY was twitmer allowed to buy this shit for Michigan? Why is it even used in the USA. (Sorry I hate her she ruined my once good name now I have to change it)

3
coffee_grdr 3 points ago +3 / -0

at the very least, these system should be "glitch" free! its not sending a rocket to mars, its counting ballots! that's it. counting... ballots.

the left loves climate-change modeling, self-driving cars, their personal data being "in the cloud", and the idea that automation will take over all jobs in 10 years, but... happily say "oh well, the computer had a glitch" and they're okay with that!!

like a calculator that adds 2 plus 2 equals 16!!! and they're still willing to rely on it!!! crazy!