7118
Affidavit from Russell Ramsland - More votes “COUNTED” in 1hr 38min period than the machines were capable of processing. 289,866 FRAUD VOTES in MI! (media.patriots.win) 🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by NoCountry4Commies ago by NoCountry4Commies +7118 / -0
244 comments
244 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (244)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 3 ▼
– BoatMcBoatface 3 points ago +3 / -0

SCOTUS can only say yes/no to whatever they are being petitioned for. So far no lawsuit asks for the remedy you mention

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BestTimeToBAlive 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some cases now ask for: throwing out all mail in ballots that weren’t in chain of custody or watched when opened, throwing out ALL mail in ballots altogether, deleting all ballots that were tabulated without anyone watching, reversing decision of who won the state, holding a special election & refusing to certify the state.

I would take any of these. But my sincerest hope is for states to grant Trump the clear winner now, in light of the disgusting fraud that debased our whole nation

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– donaldismydad 1 point ago +1 / -0

i see, so what is the remedy for SCOTUS order issued to pennsylvania to segregate all ballots received after 8pm election day, which they flat out IGNORED? SCOTUS can be ignored without consequence, save only for a petition to enforce punishment of said court order?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BoatMcBoatface 1 point ago +1 / -0

The question is pretty much moot as no one puts any weight to that issue, especially not Rudy in his PA case.

However, in a grand scheme of things, even if every single court was packed with Trump fanatics, the cases lawyers bring before them allege process issue/constitutional violation at best.

For instance, if envelopes or ballots are shredded, does that mean the results should be invalidated? This would mean county officials could invalidate results they didn’t like.

Same for process issue - you are a Red county in CA (or a blue county in TX), introduce a process issue, state results invalidated.

Even Rudy in his PA ‘ballots curing’ case realises that as he says the ballot curing was allowed because Dems wanted to defraud Trump. But then he backtracks and says, but officially, no fraud is alleged in this case.

So what judges are supposed to do?

permalink parent save report block reply