The question is pretty much moot as no one puts any weight to that issue, especially not Rudy in his PA case.

However, in a grand scheme of things, even if every single court was packed with Trump fanatics, the cases lawyers bring before them allege process issue/constitutional violation at best.

For instance, if envelopes or ballots are shredded, does that mean the results should be invalidated? This would mean county officials could invalidate results they didn’t like.

Same for process issue - you are a Red county in CA (or a blue county in TX), introduce a process issue, state results invalidated.

Even Rudy in his PA ‘ballots curing’ case realises that as he says the ballot curing was allowed because Dems wanted to defraud Trump. But then he backtracks and says, but officially, no fraud is alleged in this case.

So what judges are supposed to do?