How are our enemies explaining this 384,733 ballot drop? Can we think of an alternative explanation ourselves?

I think we need more information before we can make a solid conclusion — the affidavit just doesn't supply nearly the amount of data and analysis that we all need. Here was the chart included with the affidavit, showing the four counties with the big vote spikes.

For one, though, it's not time-stamped at all.

In the main body, the affidavit says that all this took place only over two and a half hours. But how exactly is it even calculating this? Is that the time-span between the first vote spike (Kent County) and the last one (Wayne), for example?

But that obviously wouldn't make sense — because it's not like these counties wait on the other counties to report before they start counting themselves. Clearly they were counting for some time leading up to the big spikes. But how much longer? Is the assumption that the count is "restarted" once each previous vote batch is reported by the county? (Though, again, the chart doesn't label any previous vote reports/spikes. For that matter, is this even a 100% solid assumption in the first place? Could there be concurrent counts that aren't "reset" upon each reported batch?)