7118
Comments (244)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
BeingFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which "districts" mentioned in the affidavit are not located in Michigan? Maybe I missed it but I don't see any. As far as I can tell every precinct and/or township he mentions is located in Michigan. Please post the specific quote from the affidavit to which you are asserting a "significant" error. Would like very much to find out.

This is the filed affidavit I'm working from: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18693929/1/14/king-v-whitmer/

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
BeingFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you can't quote from the filed affidavit because it isn't there is it. If you want to believe the WaPo knock yourself out.

Everyone of the townships presented in the MI filed case affidavit by Mr Ramsland is located in Michigan. You need to quote the asserted errors or stop spreading disinformation.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
BeingFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is not from the affidavit filed in Michigan. Are you retarded?

Here is the case that has been filed in Michigan. Mr. Ramsland's affidavit is attached as item 14. Please quote from this document. That should be easy for a sharp WaPo reader but you can't because what you're asserting isn't in there. At this point it seems you're just being obtuse.