7118
Comments (244)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
VinceVonVroom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Says who

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
VinceVonVroom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please. Everybody with a functioning brain understands these cases are, by necessity, being put together on an unbelievably fast schedule because of the electoral clock. The error has been amended and in no way negates the massive evidence accumulated and presented.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
VinceVonVroom 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's "all of the above." The mail-in rejection rate is a strong data point for sure, and it should be included in the mix of overwhelming evidence.

Ramsland's point about the MI machines not being able to process 384K votes in a 2.5 hour time window is absolutely devastating IMO. His affadavit is really strong, and he is a very credible witness. The MI data, swapped in for the MN, makes the same point, and makes it accurately.