WOW! North Muskegon, MI —-> 781% VOTER TURNOUT!
Other MI districts: 416%, 215%, 205%, etc, etc.
Yeah RIGHT, so much ENTHUSIASM for Biden! UNPRECEDENTED!
(media.patriots.win)
🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
Comments (44)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
https://www.wzzm13.com/article/news/muskegon-county-voter-turnout-trump-biden-19-votes/69-351c88da-af34-4b37-b0b8-d168210c9b77
I get an access denied on that... Europe.
I can not tell you what is true, it's up to you if you believe the statement under oath that I linked, or the newspaper that gives other numbers.
I believe it. I just like to cross reference. Just search North Muskoga voter turnout. It gives 64. But I trust this evidence more from you fren.
It's not my affidavit ;) I just trust the guy under oath a little bit more than a newspaper.
Besides, if I get the doc right, it's parts of the districts (precincts?) that were overrepresented like this. So for the total district it might be your number.
Quote: 11. Another statistical red flag can be observed in Michigan where even the very limited remaining public data reveals 643 precincts with voter turn-out above 80%, according to county records. Further if these very limited remaining public data votes were normalized to 80% turnout (still 15%+/- above normal), the excess votes are at least 36,812 over the maximum that could be expected. We anticipate that precincts with excess voter turnout will be even higher with complete public data (Some larger precincts in Wayne Co and others are no longer publicly reporting their data).
Someone posted last night, that the 700% doesn't mean 7x. I just skimmed over it, not really paying attention (plus I'm not math expert), but he said it didn't mean 700% in the way people think it does.
Not sure if he knew what he was talking about or not, just saying what I saw
I also saw in the affidavit that it said some places stopped publicly reporting the data. Maybe this is why people can't find it elsewhere to check, because it's not reported anywhere else?