No need to terminate. Once they start editorializing, it does not apply. Adding some notification that something is disputed is editorializing. They have added content to what was posted. Preventing a post that does not violate their terms and conditions is stepping into the the role of editor. Someone, like the campaign should sue. Or any politician who was banned or shadow banned.
This. 230 is a “self defense” type clause. It can only be invoke if sued. It doesn’t give these sites privileges, it’s designed to offer protection from prosecution (similar to self defense) if they are truly acting like a platform. It requires someone to sue them, and for them to invoke it as a defense.
No need to terminate. Once they start editorializing, it does not apply. Adding some notification that something is disputed is editorializing. They have added content to what was posted. Preventing a post that does not violate their terms and conditions is stepping into the the role of editor. Someone, like the campaign should sue. Or any politician who was banned or shadow banned.
This ^
He just needs the FCC to do their job
This. 230 is a “self defense” type clause. It can only be invoke if sued. It doesn’t give these sites privileges, it’s designed to offer protection from prosecution (similar to self defense) if they are truly acting like a platform. It requires someone to sue them, and for them to invoke it as a defense.