This is exactly why we need to change section 230.
Personally, I think that the major change that needs to happen is that very large websites with open membership needs to be treated as the public square. That any legal content must be allowed in a non-discriminatory fashion. Sections of that website can moderate for content, legality, and whether it is germane and constructive to the conversation, but the standards of moderation must be documented and carried out in a good faith manner.
Failure to do so risks civil fines or loss of 230 protections.
This is exactly why we need to change section 230.
Personally, I think that the major change that needs to happen is that very large websites with open membership needs to be treated as the public square. That any legal content must be allowed in a non-discriminatory fashion. Sections of that website can moderate for content, legality, and whether it is germane and constructive to the conversation, but the standards of moderation must be documented and carried out in a good faith manner.
Failure to do so risks civil fines or loss of 230 protections.