8808
Comments (431)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
MurmaidMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm would maybe objectionable should be more clearly defined? That might be affective and alot less catastrophic than an outright liquidation of 230.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
MurmaidMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like thie financial idea a lot, and I agree some amount of cencorship is expected (death threats, fire in a theater etc). I still think therw is acencorship angle to pursue, maybe in the form of lawsuits claiming automated electioneering as fraudulent campaign contributions or something to that effect