2353
Comments (97)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
51
spinometer [S] 51 points ago +51 / -0

You're wrong. Trump won. He knows it 100% and he leaves no room for doubt at all. He isn't saying, I will win, you'll see. He's saying unequivocally that he won, which he would only do if he has 100% proof. He has 100% proof. The commie puppet Biden will never set foot in the White House.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +3 / -6
17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
-23
MAGA1775 -23 points ago +5 / -28

I hope so. Personally, I do not believe the seized server story. It seems like disinformation/hoax just like the "DHS/CISA watermarked the ballots and Trump has them caught in a sting operation" story that was going around. Smells like the same psyops and is too "on the nose"

But I'd certainly love if it was true. Guess we will find out next week.

7
rabdargab 7 points ago +7 / -0

Listen its very simple:

The press does not cover the President

Did you hear those questions they kept asking? They want a soundbyte, thats all they care about. They want him to say something they can piece together to make him look awful. Like injecting bleach (which he never said) Thats all they do. He on the otherhand hijacks their evil bullshit questions so he can get his own message out, so at least some portion of low info America will see it.

-11
MAGA1775 -11 points ago +1 / -12

Perhaps, but Trump should stop caring about optics. They just make up stuff if they have to.

Now the media is reporting "Trump says he will leave" again, which serves to just demoralize people on our side who made not be on TD.win or follow alternative media.

I don't believe the seized story story though, so wouldn't put too much faith into it. I did my research on the story and that entire theory blew up from Gohmert repeating it on a Zoom call, where he later clarified he got his source from "a tweet on Twitter" and said "I don't know the truth"

5
Tenspot20 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ain't nobody gonna let a fucking cheater in the White House, stop being stupid!

13
Prayingforus20 13 points ago +13 / -0

Weird, I thought he said it would be very hard to concede to fraud, then he said the EC would be stupid to vote for fraud. when that not what the people voted for. He didn't "grant the transition" either, he gave them funding and an office and made it clear he was not conceding shit.

7
Prayingforus20 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think it may have had something to do with the threats to take the young women's life or maybe the media and Biden clamming this is what caused 9/11 abd not allowing them into GSA would cause another 911 and more people will die..

10
sperg 10 points ago +10 / -0

https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ121/PLAW-116publ121.pdf you guys are missing this. to get the $ biden has to do his disclosures for transition $

1
Singledout66 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes Trump had a plan all along.

-20
MAGA1775 -20 points ago +2 / -22

Someone asked him "if the electoral college elects Joe Biden are you going to leave this building (White House)?" and Trump responded "certainly I will, certainly I will, and you know that"

https://youtu.be/pg1J9k4tyAI?t=753

If I had a super secret server that showed I won with 410 electoral votes, I definitely would not say that.

Not saying that Trump doesn't have a super secret seized server, but just don't see the reason for saying you would even entertain the idea of leaving at all

16
ouvrez_les_yeux 16 points ago +16 / -0

I take that statement totally opposite. That he would only say it if he knew he'd won. The key word here is "if".

3
ChuckedIntoAVan 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s what I think too. He knows he’s not going anywhere, so of course he can say that if he loses, he will leave. Plus, the story has always been that he’s such an evil dictator that he will have to be removed by the military, so why would he feed them exactly what they want to hear and probably crash the market at the same time?

8
SpaceTiger 8 points ago +8 / -0

If I were so inclined, I could be so brazen as to say that Trump is saying “and you know that” directly to the reporter. Because the media guy is in on it and he knows sure as hell Biden ain’t getting into the White House but he’s gotta ask the questions anyway. So if he knows it, he knows Trump ain’t leaving.

He also said “you’re going to see things over the next week or two which will be shocking to people”. He didn’t say “shocking to you” as in the media but people as in normal everyday people.

4
libtards_r_stoopid 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are you new or something??? Jesus Christ, yeah let him say the obvious, he will not be leaving for four more years and that will be the lead story for the next week. Let him say that no less during a press conference about election fraud and him actuslly having won. It would be the only thing the presstitutes would talk about. He's trying to get the fraud message out there to bring the uniformed up to speed so there are fewer shocked when it all starts coming out. Its a process.

-3
MAGA1775 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Who cares what the commie press says. They say negative stuff about him 24/7. Why even bother to try and please the press?

Now because of what he said, the headlines are "Trump says he will leave" and the left is circle jerking each other, and those on our side that may not be on TD.win may be demoralized by it.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-10
deleted -10 points ago +4 / -14
16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
-1
Hairy_Mouse -1 points ago +2 / -3

I didn't like the statement either. Personally, I would have twisted the words a bit. I would have said "If Biden beats me fair and square, then absolutely I will leave". KNOWING that it's impossible, because Trump actually one, therefore it's impossible for Biden to beat him FAIRLY.

There's a lot of corruption. You see states running to certify FRAUDULENT results. I'm sure the EC will have no problem casting fraudulent votes either, if states certify. Therefore, I think it would have been better to give an answer, but no to cite the EC. They don't mean shit.

That way, he covers both bases. Says he will concede if Biden ACTUALLY wins to the media, while WE know he's actually meaning he will NOT concede.

-11
MAGA1775 -11 points ago +1 / -12

Perhaps, just saying, if the assumption is he has a secret server that if revealed would incriminate Biden and guarantee him re-election (and he's not revealing it yet for some reason) and someone asked that question it would probably be better to say "The electoral college will not be electing Biden" and then let the commie journalists panic about what that means.

Maybe I am putting too much thought into it, but that's just me, I'm not Trump. I would never even entertain the notion or idea of leaving at all to some corrupt, treasonous POS like Biden if I was holding the goods to guarantee my re-election

Personally, I do not believe the seized server story.