Section 230 only gives the platform protection from lawsuits targeting content on their site. If 230 was repealed they would probably have to shutdown completely while they rework how they can even operate in that environment.
There is a good reason for 230 to exist, it is just being abused by the larger social media platforms and should definitely be looked at eventually.
Accurate. To be clear, Facebook and Twitter's sheer existence is what enables the censorship. This is my outlook - you want to redpill the entire nation, you have to destroy the bluepill manufacturer.
In a number of ways, not just one. And I wouldn't say that Mike Flynn would - or has any plan to - speak publicly. He can serve in an official capacity now that he is pardoned.
Section 230 only gives the platform protection from lawsuits targeting content on their site. If 230 was repealed they would probably have to shutdown completely while they rework how they can even operate in that environment.
There is a good reason for 230 to exist, it is just being abused by the larger social media platforms and should definitely be looked at eventually.
Accurate. To be clear, Facebook and Twitter's sheer existence is what enables the censorship. This is my outlook - you want to redpill the entire nation, you have to destroy the bluepill manufacturer.
In a number of ways, not just one. And I wouldn't say that Mike Flynn would - or has any plan to - speak publicly. He can serve in an official capacity now that he is pardoned.
That's not a face..
Unless it's the Bad Religion video, 21st century digital boy...which I recommend
I imagine that will be my face if they address what we've long been talking about.
Censorship should have been removed a year ago. But I'm still hoping, too.
The emergency broadcast starts with: "Have you ever wondered the truth about JFK?"
😲