6362
Comments (378)
sorted by:
427
Kelcius 427 points ago +430 / -3

Arizona here in 2018 Martha McSally was winning period in the middle of the night Kirsten Cinema shot up and beat her the next morning I didn't understand it then but I do now

394
GlacialSpeed 394 points ago +396 / -2

I'm a data scientist/programmer/analyst.

Matt Braynards thorough and transparent methodology make me so happy. Like every step of the way watching how he arrives at his numbers I'm thinking "yep, and those are VERY cautious estimates, so probably a lot more!".

We Win.

117
nidesi8913 117 points ago +117 / -0

Does anyone know if the evidence is going to filled using a court case? Otherwise they are just videos on youtube. We all know they cheated

143
GlacialSpeed 143 points ago +144 / -1

Matt Braynard forwards all his findings over to the legal teams that we're all following.

I'm betting several of his studies will be used in court.

The last one he released where they did calls out to thousands of absentee ballot holders was outstanding. So much data pointing to cheating that no one impartial would be able to dismiss it.

25
paganbutterchurner 25 points ago +25 / -0

Correct me if I’m wrong but he was in the kraken documents

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
8
DarkestB4ThaDon 8 points ago +8 / -0

DONT CRICK!!!!!

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

DEPORT

5
Harbinger_of_a_kek 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’m so pleased that I immediately answered Matt’s call for funds with a generous donation, it paid off quick

2
Doc_Liberty 2 points ago +2 / -0

I feel the same way my guy. He is a true hero, as are all the patriots that felt complled to crowd source him... twice... after gofundme shut him down

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
55
wildcat1020 55 points ago +55 / -0

He says that in the video that he is helping the law teams and may even be called as a witness if necessary.

6
Sting 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes in the epoch times will examine the data but cannot show it to its readers or viewers at the moment because it’s “part of lawsuits”

2
Can-Maga 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does that mean we won't see it anywhere until it's all finished?

45
VoteThing 45 points ago +45 / -0 (edited)

It's already going in. I know I saw mentions of Braynard in Powell's lawsuit in Georgia. It seems virtually certain that his work is also mentioned in the Michigan filing, but I can't say for sure, because I haven't looked at it yet. Edit: Braynard is in the Michigan filing. Just search "Braynard". https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf

9
BravoEcho 9 points ago +9 / -0

His name is found in the Georgia lawsuit 9 times and 8 times in the Michigan lawsuit.

26
Honk4Trump 26 points ago +26 / -0

He said in the video that his data is being used in multiple lawsuits and he has signed multiple affidavits.

18
Big_Boss_Stones 18 points ago +18 / -0

His name and work is referenced in Sydneys lawsuits multiple times.

31
CuckerCarlson 31 points ago +31 / -0

No evidence!!!!

62
deleted 62 points ago +67 / -5
102
Saikifunou 102 points ago +103 / -1

God, I hope so. I’m English but I come here for hope because if Biden gets in we’re not gonna have any influence from any leaders that value liberty. The World Economic Forum and all of the shills bending the knee to them will get nothing but support from Biden. However, I’m pretty confident Trump will win. I hope you guys won’t forget about Build Back Biden’s weird globalist plans and make sure he gets a spanking for it when Trump wins.

77
KingLudwigofBavaria 77 points ago +77 / -0

Scotland here...totally agree!!

59
RedTX 59 points ago +59 / -0

Great to know that our UK pedes and frens have the night watch. Good morning, and cheers, gents!

31
AtlanticPede 31 points ago +31 / -0

We're all passengers on the Trump train, fellow Englishman here.

20
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 20 points ago +20 / -0

Man, not to jump on yall. My family is from Scotland originally. But I do work in peoples' homes and almost everyone that has a strong European accent answers the door wearing a mask. Not even making it up. Feels like 9 out of 10 Europeans answer the door with a mask on compared to 2/10 (honestly probably less] American accent speakers.

3
TownHallBall 3 points ago +3 / -0

Europedes are rare.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
28
RobinOfTheHood 28 points ago +28 / -0

This Yorkshireman agrees with your every word.

8
chlofefe 8 points ago +8 / -0

I love Yorkshire! When I visited England we spent most of our time in the city of York and visited Scarborough, and Riveaulx Abbey, and the Moors. So beautiful

1
RobinOfTheHood 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, the North Yorks moors are very scenic, romantic even.

17
vegaspatriot1776 17 points ago +18 / -1

i hear you can earn a freedom pass in the UK for getting 2 negative kung pow sicken test results in one week. you still have your freedom, you just have to earn it punch card style now. best of luck UK!

15
SunnyxStashx 15 points ago +15 / -0

The Globalists agenda for us is the only thing most people can think about right now. There are regrets from people that voted for Biden. They didn't know before they voted what his plan for the US was. I've got high hope's that Trump will win, also. It's obvious Trump and his team have been expecting this for a while now.

12
Chuj 12 points ago +13 / -1

Trump will save the world. Keep faith

16
comooragh 16 points ago +16 / -0

Communism or fascism would be preferable to the 'great reset', which is a corporatist technocracy where you exist purely as a consumer to drive meaningless production and consumption for the benefit of bankers and globalists.

8
booblitchutz 8 points ago +8 / -0

Communism or fascism is just the label they slap on authoritarianism. Who is the authority? That’s the only variable.

4
PresidentElectNPC 4 points ago +4 / -0

There was a black mirror episode about this.

-1
Sting -1 points ago +1 / -2

(((Bankers)))

12
Uvuvhchcycyx 12 points ago +12 / -0

Which is really a condemnation of the left in general.. They prefer endless war Mass surveillance police States unaccountable government and government that doesn't listen to the people over a president pushing an America first agenda commonsense immigration reform and in the endless wars ending the endless wars fighting the deep state and who actually is openi to listening to his constituents on Twitter (Trump has the most accessible presidentt ever

To be honest it just makes liberal seem like corrup evil peoplee

if constantly said for years that there anti-establishment and trying to fight against the man but really they have proven that they are very much in favor of t.. They want the establishment and the elites in chargee

23
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 23 points ago +23 / -0

The brainwashing is strong. I saw a blue checkmark get annoyed that Biden wasn't answering questions. It was the recent clip of Biden just laughing at a reporter and saying "why are you always asking me questions, man?" This blue checkmark was just realizing that Biden never says anything.

Half the country is low info voters. And I'll be fair, we have some here, too, but talking policy with the left will hurt your brain.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
10
Seal_Pen 10 points ago +18 / -8

Isn't chinese though, that's a psyop, its Soros and his gang (mostly jews and not chinese)

31
WalterJDuke 31 points ago +32 / -1

It's China and the Soros globalists. China is a near-perfect model of control for them.

18
Prussian_Pepe 18 points ago +19 / -1

It's a lot more than Soros, Soros himself is just one head of a hydra. He's the main money launder of the operation which is why the money always links back to him. The NWO idiots are many, and lots of people have hands to play in this. The CCP is both run by NWO money and wants to push it's influence out by it too. Trump had weakened them this year to a point were the CCP has been brought to their knees. They only got to were they were, Xi for instance with Biden dumping them money, OUR technology and flirting with them. Iran and the endless wars. This is Deep state in league with NWO cucks, Soros, Schwab, Roths ect. It's literally the Beast of the water (EU/Corporate elite) and the Beast of the Earth (Communism/CCP) jerking each other off. One gives it's power to the other to get it to worship the first and bring the world to it's knees. They have all been building up to this for decades, and Trump threw a wrench in their plan. All of their plots and planning is at stake here, they all would pitch in and do their part.

6
booblitchutz 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ha. China is most definitely the muscle behind this. That’s how they fight, historically. They always use malcontent proxies.

1
MAGA_or_GTFO 1 point ago +2 / -1

would be a shame if one of their damns busted.....in minecraft. : )

0
Killshot1776 0 points ago +9 / -9

The banker jews run all

4
Lions4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

You will be happy or else!

3
Minarchist_Manlet 3 points ago +4 / -1

It's not widespread fraud!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
HilldawgsACrook 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perfect Democrat impression lol all the say is no evidence and dont follow up with a rebuttal

1
CuckerCarlson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not true! That's what YOU do!!!!

1
HilldawgsACrook 1 point ago +1 / -0

K

-4
BoatMcBoatface -4 points ago +8 / -12

The problem is all of this research is based on NY Times data feed which is such is not an official data which is pretty much inadmissible.

So while there’s plenty of evidence of fraud, there’s also no evidence of fraud.

Or, how Bill Clinton would say

It all depends on what definition of ‘is’ is

17
Luckyduck 17 points ago +17 / -0

I don't believe Matt Braynard's research relies on ny times data. It's all from info on state voter rolls

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
11
nutup_orshutup 11 points ago +13 / -2

I don’t know why you are getting downvoted. This is a valid concern, one I have seen as the legal weak link since we started seeing analyses on 11/5.

As other pedes are stating in the comments, if the swamp wants to say NYT is not a valid source, then Sidney needs to go after that with three questions:

  1. what is the valid source and give us access

  2. why is NYT reporting non-valid numbers

  3. exactly how, where, and why are NYT numbers different from original source

-3
BoatMcBoatface -3 points ago +6 / -9

Thanks, but that’s not even “concern”, it’s a reality.

In the most extreme scenario: Biden (or Trump) wins a state by 99% and 99% turnout. A court cannot throw it out even if every mathematician said the results are “unlikely” to happen.

There’s no law to throw out election based on mathematicians’ opinions.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
4
Sting 4 points ago +4 / -0

First, they can just bring out their own experts who lie. Now what? They can just make up numbers and lie. Now what?

Just like I told you people years ago and months ago, go look at my comment history, that the media and the Democrat machine were going to simply invent votes and invent numbers and steal the election and I was called a doomer.

Secondly:The bar is higher than ever, we need evidence that is beyond the level we would’ve needed in the past. Judges are telegraphing this, they’re actually telling you this, and you don’t believe it because you don’t want to hear it.

Judges have SAID they don’t want to “overturn” results and be seen as activist judges. And you people should know better than everyone else that there are dirty judges everywhere that are part of the deep state, that’s been the exact excuse you have used for four years as to why we’ve got no arrests. Because we’re waiting to clean up the courts.

You can’t use that excuse for failure to go after these people, for four motherfucking years, and now pretend like there aren’t dirty judges.

This isn’t concern trolling, this isn’t dooming, this is what we are up against.

Everyone here can put their heads in the sand on the exact same goddamn motherfucking things I told them were going to motherfucking happen and actually motherfucking happened.

My track record is much much better than the same Q retards that are telling us there’s a plan in place and that nothing can stop what’s coming in the storm is coming and that the election was secure. Now they are, as always, moving the goalposts and saying that the elections weren’t secure because it’s part of a trap.

I hope they’re right because we’re going to need hard smoking gun type evidence here. Circumstantial evidence won’t do it, even though it normally should, statistical analysis isn’t going to do it, improbabilities aren’t going to do it, we better hope they have those servers. But judging from the track record of people who said we seized them, I ain’t counting on it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
BoatMcBoatface 1 point ago +3 / -2

It would only work if the defence was not allowed to bring their own experts

3
DonJr2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

If a certain election center within a state lied and said they were going home to sleep and then came right back and rammed through votes all through the night and it made a 200,000 vote lead for Trump disappear and made a county's votes hit 98% of registered voters where it never passed 70% in the past and if they shredded all identifying info on all the mail in votes... that all adds up to "a preponderance of evidence" or whatever the fuck that legal standard is.

1
BoatMcBoatface 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, kicking out Trump observers is called “irregularity” and even if true, it does not follow that irregularity invalidates the whole election.

At least that’s how the cases went so far.

Unless judges are presented with actual hard evidence, they will always side with Biden.

2
nutup_orshutup 2 points ago +3 / -1

I am attacking the veracity of the source data, or would be if I was a defendant. I think this is your point as well.

I am not a lawyer, but here is my line of thought.

Election law isn’t the initial measure, it is a lawsuit where a preponderance of evidence can suggest fraud. It doesn’t even have to satisfy the “reasonable doubt” test.

Once evidence suggests fraud, and expert math / security witnesses testify (just like in a criminal case) then we move on to what general legal remedies and specific election remedies may exist within the law, whether they have ever been applied or not.

If a situation ( election officials or just human error) poisoned a batch, the batch needs to be thrown out. The argument here is that you disenfranchise good votes mixed with bad.

However, one bad vote cancels my vote and disenfranchises me (or someone).

The same outcome happens either way - someone is disenfranchised. So now Sidney must argue and the court must rule on on higher principle.

If someone is disenfranchised no matter what, we should look at the fraud and illegality to point towards who that would be.

If election officials created fraud and made it impossible to track valid and invalid votes, the clearest answer should be to invalidate the entire scope of jurisdiction, precinct or county. Or even state if the SoS is involved.

This is the line of attack I would take. To make it worse, no one has picked up on the fact that she is filing this under USC42, Section 1983. This is the violation of civil rights act.

In GA, she is suing Kemp and Raffensperger directly. USC42 S1983 provides for individual and vicarious liability from what I can tell. This means that under the right circumstances, they can’t hide behind Qualified Immunity of the State. She made it personal, and can go after their direct assets.

Vicarious liability means they are also personally responsible for wrongdoing by anyone under their command or training programs.

A real lawyer needs to weigh in on this one, but I have seen this angle thrown around on legal websites for USC42 S 1983. Individual and vicarious liability.

-1
BoatMcBoatface -1 points ago +1 / -2

It is tricky because if you could prove 10 ballots were fraudulent then does that mean the whole election should be nullified? It’s quite an extreme remedy and with this logic election in any state could be nullified.

Same goes for Rudy’s PA ‘ballot curing’ case. If a process issue in one county could nullify the election then in next time a Blue county in a Red state (or the opposite) can intentionally create a process issue to invalidate results.

So overall judges would like to see some hard evidence to justify such an extreme remedy. And NY Times data feed or some statistical data feed does not cut it, at least Rudy is not using it in his case.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
smartass 2 points ago +2 / -0

So we need to go to court to gain access to the official logs but I'm sure that's part of the plan.

2
BoatMcBoatface 2 points ago +3 / -1

If there is time for that. Everything needs to be wrapped up before 14th Dec, including appeals.

6
Magazar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Which is why the fraudsters are stalling and are not doing audits until they are forced to. They assume status quo is Biden as president and that obstruction will bring him there.

11
bangbus 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yep. Dem strategy all along was to flood the thing with fake votes from various sources (especially mail) and then run the clock out on the back end. This was apparent months ago.

3
BoatMcBoatface 3 points ago +5 / -2

Yeah I’m aware of that. But so far no lawsuit have been filed requesting logs from a particular county. Once it’s filed it would take at least a few days to process, then Dems most likely would appeal, so 1-2 weeks just to get access to logs. And that’s not even started

5
smartass 5 points ago +5 / -0

The court case doesn't have a deadline - only Trump does. Therefore I assume that the legal team will present enough evidence to warrant a court order to prevent certification by a state until the court makes its ruling. If that ruling doesn't happen in time for the electoral voting process and if enough states are affected, that will trigger a contingent election.

1
BoatMcBoatface 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes I’m aware of that. However so far courts have been reluctant to do this.

If you look at Mr Kallman’s case in MI - he asked for the certification to be put on hold to allowed audit, and the court dismissed it adding - you’ve got “compelling evidence” so go ahead and file a case proving fraud.

1
Harper42190 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not sure why the down vote...NYT data is unofficial data ...

8
SoldierofKek 8 points ago +8 / -0

I like his work too. I'm not a data scientist, but he explains your craft in a way that makes sense. If he wanted to teach a course on it, I'd sign up.

2
Donald_Gear_Solid 2 points ago +3 / -1

Thank god for you people... Almost in tears. Nerds save America, from that codemonkey dude to the guy on here that compiled all that voter data. Its not just some autist joke. You guys have the DNA, the IQ, that might save our country. God FUCKIN speed you guys! I will never meet you but if I did all drinks on me!

3
GlacialSpeed 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm very thankful for these guys publishing and putting out these detailed analysis also.

I downloaded the edison data and have done my own stuff, mostly just verifying things I see here.

I'm not versed enough with election data or the processes to know what would look suspect vs. what's normal.

Although at this point everything sure as hell looks suspect.....Virginia in particular looks as bad or worse than some other states based on my inexperienced analysis.

1
FreedomDeliveries 1 point ago +1 / -0

Completely agree.

23
deleted 23 points ago +24 / -1
31
Kelcius 31 points ago +31 / -0

Im mad now cause it was ballot harvesting and cheating with the algorithm if we use the same tabulation machines. I think the Democratic party has going to pay dearly for this one if they get caught which I believe they will

31
Oskar 31 points ago +31 / -0

2022 is going to be a bloody mess for the dems at the polls once we're back to fair and unrigged elections.

30
SquiggyMcPepe 30 points ago +30 / -0

2020 was a bloody slaughter for them. They gained no seats and lost entire state legislatures. They would have cheated to keep them but because the turnout and margins were so huge they couldn't both mass dump votes for biden and the other candidates as they didn't have the time.

2022 will be the cleanup and taking back of the house and expanding on the senate.

7
loric4882 7 points ago +7 / -0

But they will cheat in Georgia

12
SquiggyMcPepe 12 points ago +12 / -0

If they try the same tricks they will get hammered. You don't think all eyes will be focused on the special elections from every angle?

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Sting 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nothing will come of this. Nothing will be fixed. Our republic is as good as dead. We needed to prevent this election from being stolen so we could fix the process entirely. We had four years to do it. We didn’t. At this point, we deserve to lose for being so fucking stupid. Every single “trust the plan” faggot should burn in hell for their role in allowing this to happen right under our noses. I did my part. Constant pressure on my representatives, emails and letters to the White House, personal conversations with people, I did my part to try to pressure our own team into taking care of this in advance and no one listened. If we screamed, millions of us, maybe we could have applied enough pressure. But no, we made excuses every time for why the ball was dropped on issue after issue after issue. Just because we didn’t want to criticize our own guys. Well, here we are. Thanks everybody who did goddamn fucking nothing except trust a fucking plan that never existed, you childish babies who believe in Internet fairies with secret messages. Every single member of qanon should be beaten to death.

10
NotSorryLuvTrump 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah while McSally had some kind of harvesting, remember that it was the Fuentes and the state of emergency that extended collection a full week that had impact as well.

15
Slavik777 15 points ago +16 / -1

I dont remember the guys name, but he called for emergency election, and opened election places in blue districts after all voting was technically over.

14
iVote2 14 points ago +14 / -0

Adrian Fontes - Democrat in charge of Maricopa County elections. Elected in 2016 and went immediately to work changing things. I also recall something about him going through tons of rejected voter registrations in order to admit them. I think he is also the reason Arizona now has a democrat Secretary of State - she and Fontes colluded to change Maricopa County election results. I pray they dig deep into both of them.

7
TypicalEd 7 points ago +7 / -0

He lost his reelection in 2020. Thank God for that at least!

13
Kelcius 13 points ago +13 / -0

Sounds like palette harvesting they did that here in Arizona. The Republicans took them to court and the judges said oh well what's done is done you guys can do it too. But the Republicans were in such a deficit that the Democrat won

1
Sting 1 point ago +1 / -0

BuT jUDgeS wiLl ruLe iN OuR FaVor!!!!!

7
RockyHead 7 points ago +7 / -0

Same in the Hobbs race.

7
AlcoholicRetard 7 points ago +7 / -0

Same thing happened in CT

4
Kelcius 4 points ago +4 / -0

Absolutely no doubt

145
3mort520 145 points ago +145 / -0

I knew there was no way AZ turned blue. Election night had me messed up but I know that the truth will prevail and Trump will continue to be our president and fight for us, and us for him!

71
errydaktal 71 points ago +71 / -0

yes it's a lie. The state was a strong republican not a swing state

77
BoatingAccident 77 points ago +77 / -0

When Fox called it so early you know the fix was in.

34
CloakAndDagger 34 points ago +34 / -0

As expected from Fixed News

22
errydaktal 22 points ago +22 / -0

They hyped it up as a swing state to justify the loss

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
10
artifex_mundi_x 10 points ago +10 / -0

Is that the one they called for Biden when Trump was ahead?

10
Hawkman 10 points ago +14 / -4

Pretty sure that was VA not AZ. Pretty sure Biden was “ahead” when they called AZ but there was still plenty left to count whereas other states were mostly done and still not called.

5
Noire 5 points ago +9 / -4

Nope. Va had not been called yet when they called Az. Which made it so ridiculous. Our polls hadn't even been closed for an hour and fix news magically called it despite switching their own live results to show 0% reporting in. It was insane.

4
ontothefuture 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, u/hawk man was right. They called VA at 7:01pm EST right when the polls closed and Trump was ahead by hundreds of thousands. He won VA too.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
RexCollumSilvarum 3 points ago +3 / -0

They called Virginia for Biden when Trump was ahead and only just over half the votes were in: https://thedonald.win/p/11Pp6Ulr67/usa-todays-questionable-math-wha/c/

3
dixond 3 points ago +5 / -2

Yep

4
scooterdog 4 points ago +4 / -0

For those interested in Matt's data, he published it late Monday - I saw this video Tuesday morning and realized this was likely one of the gating items for the #KRACKEN to be put together and drop late Wednesday night.

Five different kinds of fraud, with numbers and percentages of people who may have been victims of voter fraud (i.e. moved to another state and still voted in their 'home' state), or may have been disqualified from voting via absentee ballot submitted in their name, and they go into a 'provisional' ballot that never gets counted.

Plenty of numbers that show how widespread the problem was, represents an enormous amount of work post-election. Likely why the fraud was perpetrated in the first place - with such a short timeframe there isn't much time to get all the data, collect all the witnesses, and file a complaint.

Gives you the sense of what a monumental work Rudy and his team went through to get this far. https://youtu.be/XH9ihoLi1NA

80
HeavyHebrew 80 points ago +80 / -0

I swear Epoch Times and Josh are the media we need.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0 (edited)
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
Minarchist_Manlet 2 points ago +3 / -1

Even better!

1
eastern-truman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Christianity worship Jesus who can walk on water, what's the difference? This is America, where people worship God, in any shape or form.

My family worship Buddha, and we are hardcore Trump supporters. As long as we live life not hurting each other, being labelled a "cult" by a dictatorial regime is the last thing that you should be worried about.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
eastern-truman 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't sound like a true American.

-2
bighomiebeenchillin -2 points ago +6 / -8

id dump da BIGGEST nut all up in that bitch with curly hair tho

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
63
TheEmoEngineer 63 points ago +64 / -1

Welp. Pack it in boys. With what happened in PA on Wednesday and now this MAGAtastic news, start planning for January 20th. We gettin shitfaced and I don't even drink.

28
14
IPMang 14 points ago +14 / -0

JUST THE TIP:

Hold down CTRL on your keyboard and click each of the above links. They'll open in new tabs.

JAWELCOME.

2
VolareVia 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's also a setting in your account settings that will automatically open all new links from here in a new tab. That's what I've been using.

6
1776rightnow 6 points ago +8 / -2

We need to win all these lawsuits in 3 weeks. They will delay and stall for as long as possible. If time wasn't an issue of course we win the cases, but so crunched it seems impossible.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0 (edited)
3
Iranhasnukes 3 points ago +5 / -2

Please make sense. No idea what you’re saying

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
TheEmoEngineer 3 points ago +3 / -0

In that case the question becomes whether these states can certify and send electors to the Electoral College or not in the middle of pending litigation.

I've heard various scenarios. States could send 2 slates of Electors and let the House decide which ones are valid (not a good look for us).

Or they could send no Electoral Votes at all.

I would hope they wouldn't send fraudulent results that haven't yet been proven to be valid. But who knows at this point.

It's actually worse than you say.

The Electoral College votes 2 weeks from this Monday. And we have a weekend coming up. Nothing is happening on Black Friday as far as I know.

6
1776rightnow 6 points ago +6 / -0

Also the gop legislatures are all levels of weak rinos

2
TheEmoEngineer 2 points ago +2 / -0

In that case I think your username is becoming more gravely appropriate

2
ThatOtherGuyBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Congress does not certify the Electoral College vote until January 6, 2021. While still not a lot of time it is still more of it in terms of final deadline.

1
TheEmoEngineer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have a good point there pede.

Votes could still be invalidated after EC votes because the tally is in January. I forgot about that.

This is the most interesting chess game I've ever watched. Also the one with the highest stakes.

1
ThatOtherGuyBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's hope it is Trump that is playing 5D chess.

5
tiredofwinning2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’ll buy a round!

1
darthmatt005 1 point ago +1 / -0

Invest in salt mines!! My anonymous sources tell ne we bout to get rich!!

25
Pk4Trump 25 points ago +26 / -1

Can’t wait for the lefty tears

If they start rioting

SLAY them clowns and their ilk 💀💀💀

1
Sting 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I heard that the last five times they burned things down.

-1
Xuvial -1 points ago +3 / -4

If they start rioting

Why wait? Start now, for the good of the nation :D

6
Neogeo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Murder charges are generally not in the holiday spirit

2
darthmatt005 2 points ago +2 / -0

Depends on which holiday.

24
MostEffectualTopKek 24 points ago +25 / -1

Tom Fitton was calling out hugely inaccurate voter rolls for years.

Why didn't GEOTUS take heed. We all knew this was coming, and now it seems .. there's no secret weapons in the arsenal (I.e. traps), what was the administration doing ?

25
CRASCH 25 points ago +27 / -2

7D CHESS

He could have issued an EO temporarily fixing it. That wouldn't drain the swamp but probably would have won him his second term.

Instead he issued the 2018 EO. This is a well laid trap by Trump. He is the bait in the election. They go crazy with voter fraud incriminating most of the swamp, big tech, and MSM. Caught with massive irrefutable evidence. Most of which we haven't actually seen.

8
Killshot1776 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hope your right. My gut told me the same.

13
Sixty2ndAssassin 13 points ago +13 / -0

Once I read that entire EO my confidence in a Trump 2nd term skyrocketed.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
Brillica 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope his tweets today have bolstered your confidence. Keep in mind that some of his public persona is for the normies - an appearance of not knowing everything helps avoid the MSM/tech programming that he is a dictator.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
DonJr2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude I would love you to be right but you have to know how far-fetched that all is. If this happened and a bunch of arrests were made within 48 hours, yeah great he laid a trap and got them. Our odds right now are so slim it is ridiculous to say knowingly that "it's all part of a plan". I'm not a doomer but the evidence we have so far is the bulk of what we have. There may be some witnesses that are being kept as an ace up our sleeve, but there is no big red-handed, smoking gun of mass fraud.

It's one thing to know he won and be determined to see it through, but this is no slam dunk and it may very soon be time for mass protests/rallies to show that we aren't accepting this.

1
Sting 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want to believe that but literally every single time you people told me we were setting a trap for someone the trap was never sprung. Never once. Not. Once. Based on your track record I don’t believe you.

15
Pepbrandt 15 points ago +17 / -2

Trump was rallying like a madman all over the country to get out the vote and force them to cheat even harder. That was one strategy.

4
cygnusx 4 points ago +5 / -1

Trump did a big voter fraud study early in his administration. Critics say it turned up nothing. I suspect it turned up a lot, and the play was to allow it to happen in 2020 so we could catch everyone red handed.

1
ClarenceBeeks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Too risky. Not buying the setup angle. I’m sure they learned plenty that is helping them now as they build cases

20
bisontrooper 20 points ago +20 / -0

We have so much evidence, when do states start going back red as they should be?

3
DonJr2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sadly evidence is but one part of winning a suit.

I think we have about a week to see what direction these lawsuits and states go.

-21
deleted -21 points ago +4 / -25
1
SpezWifesBoyfriend 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why the downvotes?

14
Freeflow488 14 points ago +15 / -1

Because the right answer is 2020.

2
SpezWifesBoyfriend 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha fair enough.

17
ANTI_Globalist12 17 points ago +17 / -0

ON MONDAY GOP LEGISLATORS HEARINGS IN ARIZONA!!!!!! PUT PRESSURE ON THEM !!!!!!!!!

2
DonJr2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. Way too much "don't be a doomer, this is totally all per plan". I think our chance is about the chance Luc Skywalker had of blowing up the death star except without the script making it a guarantee. Need way more pressure on the ground.

16
Wesreidau 16 points ago +16 / -0

Loving this Crossroads show while I take a complete break from DoomerWire.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
16
Czshad2 16 points ago +16 / -0

Democrats say Trust the science. Unless of course the data disagrees with them.

11
Pepbrandt 11 points ago +11 / -0

Science is okay. Math is racist.

8
CantStumpIWin 8 points ago +8 / -0

I just tell them math IS science and they give me that “NPC.exe has stopped working” face.

1
HK417 1 point ago +1 / -0

With new "AI" software and hardware able to look a huge data sets very quickly they call out amazing facts about culture and race. Basically confirming every stereotype, just by looking at FBI crime statistics. One major discovery of AI was that the black community is inverted and protects it's own, more than half of black community murders go unsolved and they have the majority of murders per race. AI concluded this is because there are a few mass serial killers with body counts in the 100s that the black community protects.

Libs saw this conclusion and labeled AI raciest and then tried to fix the set data to get their favored conclusion. They took so much data out of the set the AI just kept spiting out "INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER."

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
14
Scomo 14 points ago +14 / -0

Joshua philips is like a young bannon thats not worn out :)

The epoch times is the only print media that isnt corrupt. Im buying allot of subscriptions for my families christmass presents.

12
PresidentErectHunter 12 points ago +12 / -0 (edited)

Matt says using a P.O. box and disguising it as an apartment number in when applying for a mail ballot is fraud. And he has found over a thousand of these people in Georgia. Almost all of whom did not vote in person, which also suggests fraud.

He says the FBI should be investigating this. So Where the fuck is the FBI on this?

6
Grade-AA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Where is the FBI?

I suspect they are not looking into the election fraud because they are involved.

2
ChuckedIntoAVan 2 points ago +2 / -0

They’re busy calling each other on burner phones, trying to plan their escapes.

10
ammonthenephite 10 points ago +14 / -4 (edited)

So, won't that then send the election to the House, that democrats control?

Edit-thanks for the replies, good to hear! And I learned something today.

23
BigPanda71 23 points ago +23 / -0

State delegations each get one vote. We have 26 state delegations

-10
Brave1884 -10 points ago +3 / -13

The house still has to certify. They won’t. That’s the big issue in this scenario. Only chance of reversing that is if Pelosi doesn’t get speaker.

15
CRASCH 15 points ago +15 / -0

Constitution is clear. State delegations vote period. No certification is of any kind is required by the constitution.

3
SuperPlah 3 points ago +4 / -1

What certification ?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
15
Vizrahen 15 points ago +15 / -0

The constitution is clear, it goes to the house but each state gets 1 vote. Republicans own more states.

13
deekarmy 13 points ago +13 / -0

How many RINO’s?

12
TheEmoEngineer 12 points ago +12 / -0

In entire State Legislatures??? Good question. If the States turn on their citizens then they'll have bigger problems on their hands.

1
Sting 1 point ago +2 / -1

No they won’t. Our side talks big but never does anything. I’ve had just about enough of those lies. Empty threats. Our bluff was called repeatedly in the last three years, especially, and Republicans and conservatives back down every single fucking time. Not disputable. Every single time. I’m not throwing out peoples track records just because they say they really really mean it this time.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
iVote2 3 points ago +4 / -1

Try sending a strongly worded letter.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
CRASCH 4 points ago +4 / -0

I believe the state representative has to vote along party lines.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
4
CRASCH 4 points ago +4 / -0

No they do not. It is not a house vote. It is a state representative house.

11
buttonoftime 11 points ago +11 / -0

No, they don't vote by house members. It is by state delegations which republicans have an advantage in.

8
PGM92 8 points ago +9 / -1

I'd prefer the states "flip" to Trump's column but I guess that's too much to ask. Whatever keeps Biden and Harris out of the WH.

8
lovetogarden 8 points ago +8 / -0

He doesn't know what the remedy is aside from tossing out the elections and doing a do-over. I don't think that is going to happen. I wish it would with military oversight, but the logistics might make it impossible.

4
TooHotToFrost 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lets just keep the guy thats in office and wasnt elected by way of fraud?

8
1776rightnow 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ita all about time, we need to win all these lawsuits in 3 weeks. I fear courts may delay or SCOTUS might not even take up cases.

10
artifex_mundi_x 10 points ago +10 / -0

SCOTUS will take it but it's being given to swamp judges who will run out the clock. Not sure what Trump has planned for that.

6
420weedscopes 6 points ago +6 / -0

Impeach the judge. Sullivan should be impeached anyways or whatever the process is for dethroning this treasonous man

2
1A2A 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

I was worried about that, why wouldn’t an Obama judge just sit on the case?

6
ontology [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

These three states will put it in the House - GOP wins with 26 votes to 24 for Dems

5
Jestre 5 points ago +6 / -1

Too risky with RINOs tho

-17
Brave1884 -17 points ago +1 / -18

And the house won’t certify that vote, why do people not realize this.

7
Minarchist_Manlet 7 points ago +7 / -0

What you're saying doesn't make sense.

3
ChuckedIntoAVan 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t believe they have to certify anything after the delegates vote.

2
webthing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hur Dur

6
tiredofwinning2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

send this to all the fuckers claiming “no evidence”

2
MrWombatt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately, many of those same clowns will still dispute it.

6
sosos 6 points ago +6 / -0

One of the frauds I think happened : "They" sent out Ballots to residents who don't have a history of voting. On these lists, some people have died and some have moved. These ballots were delivered to suspect addresses for harvesting.

4
NotADocileLady 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fun fact: in AZ you only need a POBox to get a drivers license.

2
RexCollumSilvarum 2 points ago +2 / -0

And an even scarier fact is that driving a car has nothing to do with voting; non-citizen immigrants are free to get driver's licenses if they learn how to drive. (Disabled Americans who can't drive thus have a harder time being able to vote.)

The clear solution is to create a Voter ID that has no other purpose.

1
NotADocileLady 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yet I need to prove my existence with my birth certificate, then the original marriage certificate from my last marriage, then the divorce decree, then my new marriage license.

And my proof of residency.

And we wonder where things went wrong, no?

4
comooragh 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've noticed leftist shilling has gone down since hard evidence started coming out. That, or thanksgiving proved these people are on someone's payroll. Either way the kraken is starting to drag them all under the surface.

1
Killshot1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like seals on their backs at the surface eating clams. All fun until the shark fin breaks the surface.

4
TheJimmReaper 4 points ago +4 / -0

Boom Fed shot

4
FluffiPuff 4 points ago +4 / -0

God, make it so - deliver us from evil!

4
DeboonkedFact 4 points ago +4 / -0

No more talk, void them already

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
MAGARondonmonson 3 points ago +3 / -0

that would get us to 269-269

3
HK417 3 points ago +3 / -0 (edited)

Black guy that lives down stairs from me saw my old Obama sticker my old civic. I used to drag race the civic and the "Obama for women" sticker was sorta a joke. Started telling me how he used blank voter ballets to help "Joe win". If it was not organized and these fucks did it on their own accord we still got a huge problem because I tried to report it but no one cared.

3
Canary 3 points ago +3 / -0

Contact Veritas w this.

3
Davito2000 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Epoch Times is just SO good.

3
MrWombatt 3 points ago +4 / -1

All of these people say they have evidence. Are they ever going to start putting it to use, or am I missing something?

11
ontology [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Braynard's 20K GA out-of-state illegal ballots are reported in Sidney Powell's lawsuit she filed on Wed.of this week.

3
MrWombatt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Okay. That's good. Appreciate the insight.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
RC22 1 point ago +1 / -0

: )

1
KasichEatingDadAss 1 point ago +1 / -0

Im gonna just nut on them after this next election.

2
NONCOMFORMIST 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn those silly little technicalities. Data? What data? 43 missing USB cards? Duhhhh where did they go George, Where did they go??

2
SoldierofKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm pretty sure we can file emergency cases in directly to SCOTUS. Let's do it and out him on point!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Omniwulf 2 points ago +2 / -0

over dinner last night I tried to enlighten my family and silence their doom and gloom.
Of course that did not go over to well.. so at the end i made them a wager that Trump will win this and serve 4 more years. Going to be a great family dinner after this is all over and Trump elected.

2
Voltus 2 points ago +2 / -0

he's so smart his hair fell out.

2
not_a_shill 2 points ago +2 / -0

oooh yeah, hard data.

2
Jdoves 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is all because they the put covid-19 over the constitution in terms of voting securely and possible irregularities. I know the whole earth got infected, but this is unprecedented. Interestingly enough we have it worse then any other country in regards to the infection rate.

2
ztrich007 2 points ago +2 / -0

THIS IS WHAT REAL JOURNALISM LOOKS LIKE

1
Mega_MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I use the same method so I can receive my packages at the post office, instead of having them delivered to my house.

1
KAMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where's the data? I want to look at it now too.

1
Rreidy8286 1 point ago +1 / -0

That smile on Matt's face tells you all you need to know.

1
1A2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

Money well donated! If you feel helpless, DONATE TO FIGHTERS!

1
YUNG_GUAC 1 point ago +1 / -0

No homo, but I could listen to Matt talk all day! His voice is so soothing. Great work to him and his team.

1
okayokay 1 point ago +1 / -0

So what will they do with this? Lin Wood and Sidney Powell both already filed Georgia cases.

1
Killshot1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Park bench. Wtf America..

1
Bigly2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

But given this info will it actually void those elections?

1
PresidentErectHunter 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

The ballot application asks you to list a mailing address (using P.O. box 123 is fine) and a residential address. Over 1000 people in Georgia found to be using a P.O. box as residence address. This could have been an innocent error except Matt says that these people used "Apartment 123" as the residential address - - trying to disguise the postal address as residential.

RED FLAG

Georgia margin is ~ 10,000. There is a thousand phony votes right there.

1
EdisonHwy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there an online image of the ballot application?

GEORGIA BALLOTS :::: https://kekpe.pe/i/5fb91d4c6f9eb.jpg

Go back to the litigation and pose questions for Marc Elias and the Georgia Secretary of State. See Case 1:19-cv-05028-WMR

::

1
PedeNo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn’t get any harder than this.

1
dirtysanchez69 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Epoch Times has been doing God’s work, especially during this election crisis. Bravo.

1
EdisonHwy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amen...very good video

1
freedom4Speech 1 point ago +1 / -0

We the People need to support this effort!