306
Comments (29)
sorted by:
21
errydaktal 21 points ago +21 / -0

ask them why this was posted on a Webserver based on Hong Kong with nameservers in China

3
Groupthinkgroupthink 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's literally no evidence, reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

3
MakinBacon 3 points ago +3 / -0

no "widespread" evidence of threats

2
foo_002 2 points ago +2 / -0

Semantics, bcs indeed it was not widespread. It was a focused targeted attack on certain counties and states.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
12
Muttsbitetoo 12 points ago +12 / -0

Discovery.

11
MrKraken [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Anyone that voluntarily tugs on Sidney's tentacles has lost their absolutely God damn mind.

8
MAGAyuri 8 points ago +8 / -0

If everything is false, this must be the easiest case to win in court, just go to court to proof it.

6
GenericInsult 6 points ago +6 / -0

I foresee another Smollet scandal in the future.

7
MrKraken [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm sure these assholes vanished to the Canary islands with no intentions of ever coming back.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
mintscape 3 points ago +3 / -0

Again, they make those claims without any evidence.

Dominion look guilty as hell, first they run away from an enquiry and now they try these "play the victim" tactics.

3
qutekouple_4_unicorn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh puleeeze... They won't do diddly squat because of discovery.

3
StarsStripesandGrit 3 points ago +4 / -1

Go ahead demonstrate that they are false.

We'll wait.

3
RunDNC 3 points ago +4 / -1

Note that aren't threatening to sue her for slander or anything of that sort, they are puffing their chests over unsubstantiated threats from phantoms.

2
20XX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where's their suit for defamation? Why aren't they really getting involved with the Dems? If they're so innocent then where's the transparency?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Knowbody 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well go on then, Dominion. Demonstrate her claims to be false, if you're that confident it can be done.

2
errydaktal 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm waiting to see that demonstration lol, I've only seen demonstration as to how they're true but words as to how they're false

2
HKFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I notice it doesn't say anything about counter-sue, libel, slanderous, etc

1
Xirturn1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then file a counterclaim

1
WestCoastG 1 point ago +1 / -0

... for any harm that may occur

Sounds like a false flag incoming

1
redinmn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did they run it thru their own machines to see how many threats they got?

1
ConservativeMom03 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why did they not show up to answer questions from the Pennsylvania State legislators?????

1
Bogey 1 point ago +1 / -0

I posted this as its own thread but here's Theranos' response to the WSJ report that outed them. I'm thinking it's the same press agent:

“Today’s Wall Street Journal story about Theranos is factually and scientifically erroneous and grounded in baseless assertions by inexperienced and disgruntled former employees and industry incumbents. Theranos presented the facts to this reporter to prove the accuracy and reliability of its tests and to directly refute these false allegations, including more than 1,000 pages of statements and documents. Disappointingly, the Journal chose to publish this article without even mentioning the facts Theranos shared that disproved the many falsehoods in the article.”

1
freefolk 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Empire Strikes Back.

1
errydaktal 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's just more media fodder to keep up the guise for as long as possible because theres nothing else they can do, they can only hope that biden wins and he won't if they don't keep up making the superficial statements for the media

1
tiredofwinning2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sidney wants them to sue! That would open their ass up to discovery. They won’t do shit.