It's the opposite of that, so it's still a poor analogy.
Caesar crossed a lawful point of no return to depose who he claimed was a tyrant, that was his cause for crossing the Rubicon you are also forgetting the part where he installed himself as life time leader and was stabbed after as a result, for being a tyrant himself.
The deep state crossed the Rubicon, the point of no lawful return for a cause, when they turned their focus to subverting the state prior to President Trump even being in office.
Trump was duly elected, has not unlawfully taken up a cause of his own, and is defending himself from hostile state actors.
I get the spirit of the comparison, but it's not correct.
It's the opposite of that, so it's still a poor analogy.
Caesar crossed a lawful point of no return to depose who he claimed was a tyrant, that was his cause for crossing the Rubicon you are also forgetting the part where he installed himself as life time leader and was stabbed after as a result, for being a tyrant himself.
The deep state crossed the Rubicon, the point of no lawful return for a cause, when they turned their focus to subverting the state prior to President Trump even being in office.
Trump was duly elected, has not unlawfully taken up a cause of his own, and is defending himself from hostile state actors.
I get the spirit of the comparison, but it's not correct.
You've got the story out of order. The Rubicon was crossed before he declared being a tyrant.
What are you talking about, learn to read.
I said his cause was to depose a tyrant, Pompey and his retinue.
You're A FAKE FAGGOT WHO JUST CLAIMED THE RUBICON WAS CROSSED AFTER YOU STATED JULIUS WAS A TYRANT.
DIDNT 👏 HAPPEN 👏 THAT 👏 WAY 👏
You actually can't read:
Caesar claimed Pompey was a tyrant, and crossed the Rubicon to depose him.
You literally have zero comprehension, faggot.