On a contrary, since a judge that would flip a state from Biden to Trump would instantly become a new target of a worldwide hate mob, a wise judge will only rule for Trump if he’s presented with hard fraud evidence that cannot be interpreted in any other way.
In PA, judges changed election laws, not legislators. The change allowed additional ballots to be cast after polls closed. Even if those votes are real, they're illegally cast per the law. That's how I understand it at least. Is there another way to interpret that?
In some cases it was the governor, not even judges. Yes, these were illegal changes according to PA law, but my hopes that a PA court will overturn are slim. And I’m not sure SCOTUS will step that far into PA law.
They can only be considered to cast “illegally” when a court makes such determination. And that case has already been litigated up to PA Supreme Court so as of now these “illegal” votes are very much legal.
A wise judge will fall on the side of highest probability. Case closed.
That’s not what has been happening so far.
On a contrary, since a judge that would flip a state from Biden to Trump would instantly become a new target of a worldwide hate mob, a wise judge will only rule for Trump if he’s presented with hard fraud evidence that cannot be interpreted in any other way.
In PA, judges changed election laws, not legislators. The change allowed additional ballots to be cast after polls closed. Even if those votes are real, they're illegally cast per the law. That's how I understand it at least. Is there another way to interpret that?
In some cases it was the governor, not even judges. Yes, these were illegal changes according to PA law, but my hopes that a PA court will overturn are slim. And I’m not sure SCOTUS will step that far into PA law.
They can only be considered to cast “illegally” when a court makes such determination. And that case has already been litigated up to PA Supreme Court so as of now these “illegal” votes are very much legal.